Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2019 13:16:47 +0200 From: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> To: Torsten Zuehlsdorff <freebsd@toco-domains.de> Cc: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org>, "Timur I. Bakeyev" <timur@freebsd.org>, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>, Tijl Coosemans <tijl@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all <svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>, svn-ports-head <svn-ports-head@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r504590 - in head/net: samba46 samba47 samba48 Message-ID: <20190702111647.vozqzf4gnqbajvcl@atuin.in.mat.cc> In-Reply-To: <d9d37be2-8279-af6a-1283-67f25f4f8835@toco-domains.de> References: <201906192240.x5JMequU017187@repo.freebsd.org> <20190628070305.eim4o3d77iyti5d5@ivaldir.net> <20190629160445.051f2426@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <CALdFvJHK0aBF6oLTFNnTiUyrmFUHCPYm3-k7S3_-FpYTHW4WSA@mail.gmail.com> <F208C261-18D8-4E5A-BABE-A9E6D8A52B5B@FreeBSD.org> <CALdFvJENynqPAkKSf5ueuG2nBMr9tckikzZOQv9caXtgcwZg4A@mail.gmail.com> <20190702102316.wv6w5u2ilfaw6vrd@atuin.in.mat.cc> <d9d37be2-8279-af6a-1283-67f25f4f8835@toco-domains.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--gzoesqscjnqjcfyf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 12:31:35PM +0200, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote:
>=20
>=20
> On 02.07.19 12:23, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 01:23:34AM +0200, Timur I. Bakeyev wrote:
> >> On Sat, 29 Jun 2019 at 22:50, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> wr=
ote:
> >>
> >>> Le 29 juin 2019 20:40:53 GMT+02:00, "Timur I. Bakeyev" <timur@bat.ru>=
a
> >>> =E9crit :
> >>>> Tonight I hope to commit 4.10 port.
> >>>
> >>> It does not solve rhe pb, staying on the legacy libs is the solution,=
as I
> >>> said even fedora is on the legacy
> >>>
> >>>
> >> I've committed net/samba410.
> >>
> >> My view on the situation is that all the ports, which use
> >> devel/{talloc,tevent}, databases/tdb should keep
> >> using them, unless they are broken by using them(but that shouldn't ha=
ppen,
> >> API still should remain
> >> the same. The biggest difference is the drop of the dependency on Pyth=
on27,
> >> as far as I can see.
> >=20
> > So, branching 2019Q2 is now a day late.
> > When are you going to fix the issue?
>=20
> Mat, is this the reason the branch is late? If so: have you considered
> branching from r504589?
It is being considered, yes, as a last resort kind of thing. timur@ has
had 13 days to fix the problem, I hope he is getting close to fixing it
all.
--=20
Mathieu Arnold
--gzoesqscjnqjcfyf
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQKTBAABCgB9FiEEOraXidLtEhBkQLpbOkUW81GDzkgFAl0bPR9fFIAAAAAALgAo
aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNB
QjY5Nzg5RDJFRDEyMTA2NDQwQkE1QjNBNDUxNkYzNTE4M0NFNDgACgkQOkUW81GD
zkgoLA//U2FyWddwTMQydjUJllXLzOxcObODS5WH7myDHyb4Q/vqskGxGLEeqsFt
j7W9oyF54GOMQEZSWarVj02JSNFn64Y8ZurICbDR5BP8gyOlS760dOKLpMgQKwDs
bNNDSgB6KDVuWiK3AuPB7MfIaqmqVKI7rPZTCYhbXjejXi498y5sEyMPo12jft1t
ouaohJD5UApFqw2IVyXyRjmiGC9pwCV5xje6XfqidmoHLXdY/k29EaIC5JtAxexO
kQCsu8M1o62eOqaedeTsoWk7qwzqJJXHvy1fiiICSIYmxJRT6flgmh4RkBY0pz0V
E8b3psQEW3TN1GOwIcz4oLdPWMJOcS8U86BczaUGJoslHTvDSNWHNvq9p5Qsah5a
RpTVThFKXn77+g60DvUpwtMP3/lX2SAsPjYmpenUc4EJ+jJRrz3Hl+y5VfujhRfI
03BbpzTYML5J0HwV0Pua0AIGQ9QnFc6+jbYs9eK0qjooeT+2rMOg1BaG3SAmanC4
m7c4ffOZbfYJkUO9OiDfTBzVTagoPC1bw+ibKdMkXHEFLlrbFGY0HFdiSDU6aEpf
N/f2WtbrTzPoNosk8YPa5Oo6i+6EF5nKQfyTN8swsSe22BPu/tpSSI8XV6oHz1+r
z7xwCY22ca+WjXN6FRO4h/6lMWWw1LE+OIhX6sa62e3SSbl5TAc=
=wplY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--gzoesqscjnqjcfyf--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20190702111647.vozqzf4gnqbajvcl>