From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 20:14:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1D9216A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 20:14:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: from web33305.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33305.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 46B2643D46 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 20:14:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 12327 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Jan 2006 20:14:19 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Dq3kazdzp+nSSCARLnVBkHt1Ih3odAma4ku3o7S8DYgxS1rr3oLL43S8S74QQLbUtGDJBlW+OxBKukXSfTQPnVIijkIykkBy0ZLSKdyniUVoT5CEHyPCMONJ34a9fAiJHsiC3+sRO5wfnv0u5WfOQN5q/MCN8BmLwzCKDL6wJow= ; Message-ID: <20060108201419.12325.qmail@web33305.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.46.186.215] by web33305.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 12:14:19 PST Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 12:14:19 -0800 (PST) From: Danial Thom To: Wojciech Puchar , Michael Bernstein In-Reply-To: <20060108155751.H22903@chylonia.3miasto.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: jasonharback , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Robert Slade Subject: Re: Sparc vs i386 architecture X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: danial_thom@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 20:14:21 -0000 --- Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > Hi group, I was just wondering if there's an > advantage to running FreeBSD on > > a SPARC than compared with a regular PC. > Obviously the architecture is > > different (CISC vs RISC). How ever you can > purchase a higher powered PC box > > for less money than it would cost for a > SPARC. > > > user Opteron/Athlon64 - better than both :) > > AMD made RISC-like architecture that just runs > i386-like code (i386+more > registers and few extra instructions, while > lots of mostly-unused > instructions emulated). Thats hilarious, a "reduced instruction set" processor that has extra instructions! Good one! DT __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com