From owner-cvs-all Sat Feb 23 16:53:15 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [216.240.41.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 924FF37B400; Sat, 23 Feb 2002 16:53:12 -0800 (PST) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.11.6/8.9.1) id g1O0rC321027; Sat, 23 Feb 2002 16:53:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 16:53:12 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <200202240053.g1O0rC321027@apollo.backplane.com> To: Alfred Perlstein Cc: John Baldwin , Seigo Tanimura , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/coda coda_venus.c src/sys/compat/linprocfs References: <200202232030.g1NKU4m87533@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020223204610.GG80761@elvis.mu.org> <200202232056.g1NKuKf41350@apollo.backplane.com> <20020223212005.GK80761@elvis.mu.org> <200202232212.g1NMCI041812@apollo.backplane.com> <20020224004637.GO80761@elvis.mu.org> Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG :> :> I'm fairly sure that the only time we can't block occurs while we are :> holding a leaf mutex. The MTX_LEAF flag in the thread may be sufficient. :> After all, why else would you not be able to sleep? : :You are an interrupt? : :-- :-Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org] Well, sched_lock is an exception of course. But a fast-interrupt could prove to be a problem. Do we even support fast interrupts at the moment? -Matt Matthew Dillon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message