From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 23 20:23:41 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A4B31065670 for ; Sun, 23 Jan 2011 20:23:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from cpoproxy3-pub.bluehost.com (cpoproxy3-pub.bluehost.com [67.222.54.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0242E8FC0A for ; Sun, 23 Jan 2011 20:23:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4854 invoked by uid 0); 23 Jan 2011 20:23:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by cpoproxy3.bluehost.com with SMTP; 23 Jan 2011 20:23:40 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=GvwN8IqEcEwDJsZ4e7UJA2eGkjUQrT56mrz+iN+T9qdz681WfN8Ke57Ddhx+OXL3yQ9QuZv6OJbfJnhPCoSXmotj8HJJ+XCO+xQ4OhcOdxWrfGboXid3RB1WqrI8JE/6; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kukaburra.hydra) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ph6TL-00087m-61 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2011 13:23:40 -0700 Received: by kukaburra.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 23 Jan 2011 13:14:18 -0700 Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 13:14:18 -0700 From: Chad Perrin To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20110123201418.GA56598@guilt.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD References: <20110122214356.GA96562@thought.org> <4D3B7561.6040601@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20110123013747.GA53062@guilt.hydra> <4D3BBD3C.8070007@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20110123061837.361c6c6a@scorpio> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="T4sUOijqQbZv57TR" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110123061837.361c6c6a@scorpio> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: Re: follow up... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 20:23:41 -0000 --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 06:18:37AM -0500, Jerry wrote: > On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 15:31:40 +1000 > Da Rock articulated: >=20 > > Actually the consensus on this list _is_ to hit reply all- some only > > get digest or are not even subscribed, so they won't receive posts > > only posted to the list. Unfortunately that can mean you can continue= =20 > > receiving replies not necessarily directly to your own posts. >=20 > consensus >=20 > Meaning: > : a general agreement about something : an idea or opinion that is > shared by all the people in a group [singular] >=20 > OK, when was the vote on this issue taken? I must have been out of > town that week. You and me both. I loathe getting multiples of emails. I'm on the list, so I already get a copy. I have no problem doing a group reply by request when someone's not on the list or only gets digest mails, though, or getting duplicates as a side-effect of that -- again, *by request*. Just spamming people with duplicates all the time for no good reason is a mite annoying, though. If I was aware of a vote, I would have voted "list reply". --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk08jBoACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKWnKACgkMDEELDfwSHW53iwjdehFI4n ZkIAoLPgP2siBMm+n3nQd/FLy7Mk99eu =DWU+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR--