From owner-freebsd-questions Fri May 12 4:33:53 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from rasp.eng.cam.ac.uk (rasp.eng.cam.ac.uk [129.169.8.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6085537BA39 for ; Fri, 12 May 2000 04:33:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jpmg@eng.cam.ac.uk) Received: from tigger.eng.cam.ac.uk (via root@tigger.eng.cam.ac.uk [129.169.80.71]) by rasp.eng.cam.ac.uk with ESMTP id MAA06047 for ; Fri, 12 May 2000 12:33:49 +0100 (BST) Received: from tulip.eng.cam.ac.uk (via mailuser@tulip [129.169.81.11]) by tigger.eng.cam.ac.uk with ESMTP id MAA10172 for ; Fri, 12 May 2000 12:33:48 +0100 (BST) From: jpmg@eng.cam.ac.uk Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 12:33:47 +0100 (BST) Message-Id: <200005121133.12513@tulip.eng.cam.ac.uk> Received: (via jpmg@localhost) by tulip.eng.cam.ac.uk id MAA12513 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Fri, 12 May 2000 12:33:47 +0100 (BST) To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: rpc.lockd / nfs versions Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I've come to this conclusion since snooping the network indicates that > the client keeps doing version==4 requests and ignoring the "can't do > that, I'm prepared to accept versions between 1 and 3" reply, whereas > it's quite happy doing locking against a SunOS4 machine where only rpc > versions 1-3 of the lock manager are available, but only nfs v2 is > being provided. And, I've now found an easier way of confirming that this must be the case, by looking at RFC1813. > Is anyone looking at this at the moment? This question still stands, though 8-) -patrick. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message