From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 11 22:47:26 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AC773D8 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 22:47:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirj.bris.ac.uk (dirj.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C87B730D for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 22:47:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsc.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.41]) by dirj.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U529k-0000ln-Rk; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 22:47:24 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncsc.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U529k-00048l-BQ; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 22:47:24 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r1BMlOE8089991; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 22:47:24 GMT (envelope-from mexas@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r1BMlNfd089990; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 22:47:24 GMT (envelope-from mexas) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 22:47:24 GMT From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201302112247.r1BMlNfd089990@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> To: gerald@pfeifer.com, jnagyjr1978@gmail.com Subject: Re: is it a good idea to overwrite GCC_DEFAULT_VERSION= in Mk/bsd.gcc.mk? In-Reply-To: <51197363.5020203@gmail.com> Cc: mexas@bristol.ac.uk, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 22:47:26 -0000 From jnagyjr1978@gmail.com Mon Feb 11 22:45:53 2013 On 02/11/13 09:21, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > Hi Anton, > > On Thu, 7 Feb 2013, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: >> And anyway, 4.7 will be the default soon, right? > > That's what I have been hoping to do, yes. With the ports > build cluster being unavailable for months now, we simply > could not do the necessary testing though. > > Anyone who wants to give this a try, I'd be happy to see that. It was my understanding GCC any version is being phased out (at least as a default) in favor of clang/llvm? Has this changed? We are talking about lang/gcc4x, not the default OS compiler. Anton