Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 10 Jul 2001 16:06:40 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com>
To:        "David O'Brien" <arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: nvi maintainer?
Message-ID:  <200107102306.f6AN6e820560@earth.backplane.com>
References:  <200107072203.PAA09299@windsor.research.att.com> <xzp3d88s3o0.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20010708005155.J8775@canonware.com> <20010708032002.D97456@bohr.physics.purdue.edu> <20010709150739.A23210@cicely20.cicely.de> <200107091817.LAA16879@windsor.research.att.com> <20010709164715.F85805@over-yonder.net> <20010709213007.A18204@futuresouth.com> <xzpn16cxymc.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <200107102242.f6AMgoO20085@earth.backplane.com> <20010710154825.B98432@dragon.nuxi.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

:
:On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 03:42:50PM -0700, Matt Dillon wrote:
:>     I live for undo.  vim doesn't do it right.  
:
:Blah.  Vim does it *TOTALLY CORRECT*.  nvi's sucks.
: 
:>     And vim's split screen stuff is aweful.  It is far too easy to accidently
:>     get into split screen mode.
:
:See above correcting your backwards statements of vim vs. nvi.
: 
:-- 
:-- David  (obrien@FreeBSD.org)

    I'm sorry Dave, but it's a matter of opinion.  I strongly believe that
    vim does it incorrectly.  You can believe otherwise, but that's doesn't
    mean my statement is backwards any more then yours is.

						-Matt


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200107102306.f6AN6e820560>