Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2000 19:04:31 +0900 From: "Akinori -Aki- MUSHA" <knu@idaemons.org> To: jim@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG, saken@hotel.rmta.org Subject: Re: review of update for tidy port Message-ID: <863dq591hs.wl@daemon.local.idaemons.org> In-Reply-To: In your message of "Sun, 5 Mar 2000 01:08:43 -0800" <20000305010843.A64205@luna.cdrom.com> References: <20000305010843.A64205@luna.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello,
At Sun, 5 Mar 2000 01:08:43 -0800,
Jim Mock <jim@FreeBSD.ORG> wrote:
> -DISTNAME= tidy30nov99
> -PKGNAME= tidy-0.11.99.2
> +DISTNAME= tidy13jan00
> +PKGNAME= tidy-0.01.00.1
Doesn't it look weird to lower the version number on upgrade? I
guess some people may and `pkg_version' will judge 0.01.00.1 is older
than 0.11.99.2. I suppose `tidy-yyyymmdd' style is clearly better for
the convenience of comparison. Isn't it?
--
/
/__ __
/ ) ) ) ) /
Akinori -Aki- MUSHA aka / (_ / ( (__( <knu@idaemons.org>
"If you choose not to decide you still have made a choice."
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?863dq591hs.wl>