From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 29 13:52:11 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09AAC106566B for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:52:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luigi@onelab2.iet.unipi.it) Received: from onelab2.iet.unipi.it (onelab2.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C11CB8FC0C for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:52:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luigi@onelab2.iet.unipi.it) Received: by onelab2.iet.unipi.it (Postfix, from userid 275) id E21F7730A1; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:57:22 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:57:22 +0200 From: Luigi Rizzo To: Erik Trulsson Message-ID: <20090429135722.GB51674@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> References: <49F7709F.1020409@modulus.org> <172091.41695.qm@web63907.mail.re1.yahoo.com> <20090429132156.GA42816@owl.midgard.homeip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090429132156.GA42816@owl.midgard.homeip.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Barney Cordoba , Andrew Snow , FreeBSD Net Subject: Re: Interrupts + Polling mode (similar to Linux's NAPI) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:52:11 -0000 On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 03:21:56PM +0200, Erik Trulsson wrote: > On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 05:46:32AM -0700, Barney Cordoba wrote: ... > > When the collective answer to better network performance is polling, it > > makes it appear as if the FreeBSD project is a bunch of dudes working on > > stuff they feel like doing, rather than there being some centralized plan > > to make the project successful. > > That appearance is probably due to the fact the the FreeBSD project actually > is a bunch of dudes working on what they feel like doing (or in a few cases > on what they get paid for doing), and that there is very little centralized > planning being done. (And even if there was, there is no way of enforcing > that people work according to such a plan.) not to mention that very little if any work has been done on polling recently: i developed the base system in 2001-2002, and since then there has been just some basic maintainance (at least in the tree). cheers luigi