Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 01:30:40 +0000 From: Jamie Paul Griffin <jamie@gnix.co.uk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portupgrade status Message-ID: <20110104013040.GA39411@daemon.gnix.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimBnm9BKCc3LmgL0WCXWRrNMgvx%2BkwwrfQ%2BUGgO@mail.gmail.com> References: <14212432ba707fc5f9fbc75b56e8e783@flabnapple.net> <20101226214221.GB68570@stainmore> <AANLkTi=bD60UiybsaioHwEDgsXAQpAeJ6VuPiDvSZ%2B0P@mail.gmail.com> <86pqsogfvu.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <4D186D11.1030708@infracaninophile.co.uk> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1012271354470.35608@fledge.watson.org> <20110103225455.GA37597@daemon.gnix.co.uk> <AANLkTimngzkkfbFnego5MP50xHLS0NHvnL9to0V3pQTT@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikTi2J-cCzryFEG4cZvDCQxn83ycJ_1AnzO-QJi@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimBnm9BKCc3LmgL0WCXWRrNMgvx%2BkwwrfQ%2BUGgO@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 07:51:48PM -0500, illoai@gmail.com wrote: > No, the -R flag in portmaster tells it to not rebuild > ports taht have already been built on this run (I > believe from reading man portmaster). The -R > flag in portupgrade rebuilds the ports on which > the named port depends Indeed, this -R option is useful. Up-to-now i've not used anything else other than portupgrade but i'll have a look over the man pages of portmaster, etc.; i'll probably continue to use portupgrade for a while though. jamie
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110104013040.GA39411>