Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 24 Mar 2009 20:11:27 +0100
From:      =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Peter_Ankerst=E5l?= <peter@pean.org>
To:        Charles Sprickman <spork@bway.net>
Cc:        stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: LSI Logic raid status
Message-ID:  <0B69CE4E-CC04-445B-9E84-C8E359136CCF@pean.org>
In-Reply-To: <754A2F8B-21E7-493A-BD31-EA5691082D1E@bway.net>
References:  <91FBB56E-9B1F-469D-A83E-03396AA850FC@pean.org> <61AAA3A1-B794-4CF5-8F16-F30DB42940D9@verweg.com> <F0FE0D3A-7190-4877-9946-6542071EF731@pean.org> <754A2F8B-21E7-493A-BD31-EA5691082D1E@bway.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Mar 24, 2009, at 8:00 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote:

>
>
> dev.mpt.0.nonoptimal_volumes: 0
>
> Don't test whether the "nonoptimal_volumes" parameter works, it does -
> but if you pull a drive, FreeBSD likes to panic both on the loss of =20=

> a disk
> and then again when the drive is reconnected and the rebuild =20
> completes.
> This is apparently some problem in the CAM layer, not the mpt =20
> driver, but
> it's something to be aware of.  Scott Long has noted that this is =20
> being
> worked on in 8.x.


Yes, I tried to remove a drive today. Of course I need to see if it =20
works properly
before using it "for real". It did, but just as you say it paniced =20
when I pulled the
drive and when is was resynced. But it sound great if someone is =20
working on
this problem!

--
Peter Ankerst=E5l
peter@pean.org
http://www.pean.org/




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0B69CE4E-CC04-445B-9E84-C8E359136CCF>