Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 19 Sep 2011 18:13:58 -0700
From:      Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org>
To:        Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>
Cc:        Jason Usher <jusher71@yahoo.com>, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ZFS obn FreeBSD hardware model for 48 or 96 sata3 paths...
Message-ID:  <4E77E8D6.1050108@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20110919223653.0000702b@unknown>
References:  <72A6ABD6-F6FD-4563-AB3F-6061E3DD9FBF@digsys.bg>	<1316458811.88701.YahooMailClassic@web121208.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <20110919223653.0000702b@unknown>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
jason, you still haven't said what the reason for all this is..  
speed, capacity, both or some other reason..
(or if you did, I missed it).

it also makes a difference in how much ZIL or L2ARC you will need and 
how you will lay that out..





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E77E8D6.1050108>