From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Aug 18 12: 5:13 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mail.mdanderson.org (mail.mdacc.tmc.edu [143.111.87.47]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB5B837B422 for ; Fri, 18 Aug 2000 12:05:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jef-nt.mdacc.tmc.edu.mdacc.tmc.edu (jef-nt.mdacc.tmc.edu [143.111.64.202]) by mail.mdanderson.org (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with SMTP id OAA08960; Fri, 18 Aug 2000 14:01:47 -0500 (CDT) From: Jonathan Fosburgh MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14749.35037.624000.173376@jef-nt.mdacc.tmc.edu> Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 14:05:01 -0500 (GMT-6:00) To: Eduardo Viruena Silva Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: "ed" interface cannot be recognized. In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under 21.1 (patch 8) "Bryce Canyon" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Eduardo Viruena Silva writes: > > Hello pals! > > I have a problem with a "ugly duckling" ethernet interface. > It is a ne2000 compatible ethernet card based on RealTek 8029 chip. > > It was working on FreeBSD 3.4... I do not understand, FreeBSD 4.1 > issues this message: > > ed0: irq 10 at device 14.0 on pci0 > device_probe_and_attach: ed0 attach returned 2 > > I thought the problem was on the card itself and I change it > and the new one [based on the same chip] did not work either. > FWIW I use the "same* card in 4.1 with no problems. Is this 4.1-R or some -STABLE? -- Jonathan Fosburgh Open Systems Communications and Computer Services MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, TX To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message