Date: Mon, 18 Aug 1997 01:26:03 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jamil J. Weatherbee" <jamil@counterintelligence.ml.org> To: Meir Dukhan <mdukhan@bis.co.il> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: wd0: interrupt timeout: Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970818012032.26915B-100000@counterintelligence.ml.org> In-Reply-To: <33F8092F.2C67412E@bis.co.il>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Are you running two hard drives in a master/slave configuration on a single controller --- if you are I think I had similiar problems you don't want more than one hard drive on each controller, I have two IDEs one on the primary as master with a cdrom as slave and one on the secondary set to cable select. These are both western digital 2.1 gigs if i put both say on the primary controller, one as master one as slave -- the second effectively doesn't work, returning lots of messages like yours under heavy usage, my theory is that somehow the ide controller cannot handle two fast eides chugging out data and misses interrupts somehow, when they start making ide hard drives that use atapi protocol then i'll be happy. On Mon, 18 Aug 1997, Meir Dukhan wrote: > Hi, > > > Is one can tell me what this messages mean ? > > wd0: interrupt timeout: > wd0: status 50<rdy,seekdone> error 0 > > thanks, > -- Meir >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.970818012032.26915B-100000>