Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 12 Jan 2008 17:23:03 +0200
From:      Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
To:        Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Improving the handling of PR:s
Message-ID:  <20080112152303.GV57756@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
In-Reply-To: <478887B4.9030906@bsdforen.de>
References:  <478556AD.6090400@bsdforen.de> <20080110003524.GB5188@soaustin.net> <200801111935.50821.peter.schuller@infidyne.com> <478887B4.9030906@bsdforen.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--5tYp7H6kQ0uP/7P1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 10:26:12AM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> Peter Schuller wrote:
> > The second, possibly worse effect, is that the original submitter, I be=
lieve,=20
> > is less inclined to spend more time in the future contributing, if said=
=20
> > submitter feels the work is wasted because no one commits or even comme=
nts on=20
> > the PR.
>=20
> I can confirm this, one of our members started writing a new driver for t=
he
> ES1370 sound chip (following the hardware docs), because the current driv=
er
> has sampling rate and other issues (at least for this user) to this day. =
To
> see how commitments are received he sent a one-line patch for the existing
> driver kern/98167.
>=20
> It was never committed due to lack of further feedback from others and our
> member stopped developing the driver. Since he explained his patch with
> stating that the current implementation doesn't follow the HW-specs, I do=
n't
> think that further testing would have been required to commit it to a
> developer branch like CURRENT or RELENG.

Did you read the audit-trail ? I taken the patch, because I though that
I have such card. After the truth revealed that I am not, I preferred to
not broke support for somebody hardware. If there are other users of the
same card, why do not they complain and test the patch ?

--5tYp7H6kQ0uP/7P1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFHiNtWC3+MBN1Mb4gRAklJAJ9BgrAtjG1FDsN2qu/GmcjUcr0nSQCg14rT
v/yo+f84lbQJnfVkpYSLOEY=
=plnE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--5tYp7H6kQ0uP/7P1--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080112152303.GV57756>