From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 10 23:52:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBC9F16A4CF for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 23:52:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tx1.mail.ox.ac.uk (tx1.mail.ox.ac.uk [129.67.1.167]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89F6C43D46 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 23:52:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cperciva@freebsd.org) Received: from scan1.mail.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.1.166] helo=localhost) by tx1.mail.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1CzO6z-0005Wh-6M for cvs-all@freebsd.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 23:52:42 +0000 Received: from rx1.mail.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.1.165]) by localhost (scan1.mail.ox.ac.uk [129.67.1.166]) (amavisd-new, port 25) with ESMTP id 21236-01 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 23:52:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp1.herald.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.0.247]) by rx1.mail.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1CzO6y-0005WG-5D; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 23:52:40 +0000 Received: from dhcp1041.wadham.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.161.41]) by smtp1.herald.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1CzO6y-0006p7-3z; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 23:52:40 +0000 Message-ID: <420BF3C8.5080501@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 23:52:40 +0000 From: Colin Percival User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050113) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Luigi Rizzo References: <200502102331.j1ANVRQP026186@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050210155027.B49218@xorpc.icir.org> In-Reply-To: <20050210155027.B49218@xorpc.icir.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: Warner Losh cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/ed if_ed.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 23:52:43 -0000 Luigi Rizzo wrote: > hm... it would have sufficed (and more obvious) > to just put an empty statement without the 'continue' ? > > while (complicated-expr) > ; Depends how clean your monitor is. When I see that, I think that the semicolon is a couple spots of dirt on my LCD -- I'm not accustomed to seeing punctuation by itself like that. Colin Percival