From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Mar 8 14: 9:58 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from gollum.esys.ca (dhcp198-52.esys.ca [198.161.92.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DCCD37B718; Thu, 8 Mar 2001 14:09:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lyndon@gollum.esys.ca) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gollum.esys.ca (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f28M9hU04940; Thu, 8 Mar 2001 15:09:43 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from lyndon@gollum.esys.ca) Message-Id: <200103082209.f28M9hU04940@gollum.esys.ca> From: Lyndon Nerenberg Organization: ACI / Messagingdirect X-URL: http://www.messagingdirect.com/ To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ABIT KT7 and temp monitoring In-Reply-To: Message from "Jim King" of "Thu, 08 Mar 2001 15:37:27 CST." <01d601c0a818$0cbc1c70$524c8486@jking> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <4937.984089383.1@localhost> Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2001 15:09:43 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > healthd works fine on systems that use supported monitoring chips. > Unfortunately the number of chips that healthd supports is pretty small > compared to monitoring tools on other platforms, e.g. Motherboard Monitor on > Windows or LM Sensors on Linux. Which says to me that the interface should be abstracted out. Something like a device driver that presents a /dev device that you can read or ioctl to get the information in a somewhat chip- independent fashion. --lyndon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message