From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jun 16 17:34:33 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD259A76A9B for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 17:34:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@sohara.org) Received: from smtp1.irishbroadband.ie (smtp1.irishbroadband.ie [62.231.32.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89ACC1661 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 17:34:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@sohara.org) Received: from [89.127.62.20] (helo=smtp.lan.sohara.org) by smtp1.irishbroadband.ie with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1bDawT-00033l-SI for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 18:18:57 +0100 Received: from [192.168.63.1] (helo=steve.lan.sohara.org) by smtp.lan.sohara.org with smtp (Exim 4.86_2 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1bDawc-000PVV-FR for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 17:19:06 +0000 Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 18:18:56 +0100 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS: Is 'zpool add' really irreversible? Message-Id: <20160616181856.caac932154898e8e7f5d93c5@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.24.29; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.1) X-Clacks-Overhead: "GNU Terry Pratchett" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 17:34:33 -0000 On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:10:24 -0400 Matthew Ahrens wrote: > *Matthew Seaman Wrote:* > > > Suffice it to say though that there is already fix for those 'Oh No! I > > really didn't mean to type "zfs add" there' moments in the upstream > > OpenZFS repo > > > > That's unfortunately not the case. Device removal has been implemented in > Delphix but not yet upstreamed to OpenZFS / illumos. We hope to upstream > it in the next 6 months. Very nice, now all we need is extending raidz(x) vdevs with some kind of background restripe of existing data and all sane manipulations are possible. I'm not holding my breath for that one, and would not be surprised if it never happens, but it would be handy. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith