From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 12:32:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAEB716A4CF; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 12:32:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cs1.cs.huji.ac.il (cs1.cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7257B43D67; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 12:32:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from pampa.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.80.32]) by cs1.cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp id 1BqWYd-000Ow5-7y; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 15:32:19 +0300 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.0 06/18/2004 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Peter Grehan In-Reply-To: Message from Peter Grehan of "Fri, 30 Jul 2004 22:31:46 +1000." <410A3FB2.908@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 15:32:19 +0300 From: Danny Braniss Message-Id: <20040730123220.7257B43D67@mx1.FreeBSD.org> cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problems compiling latest -current X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 12:32:20 -0000 > > Since noone is complaining, then it might be that I cross >compile - > compiling > >under stable (4.10) for current, this worked fine till now. > > I get this too, using 5.1-RELEASE. The fix was: > > RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int/Makefile,v > retrieving revision 1.41 > diff -u -r1.41 Makefile > --- Makefile 28 Jul 2004 05:27:20 -0000 1.41 > +++ Makefile 29 Jul 2004 10:24:33 -0000 > @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ > > # Files from libiberty. > SRCS= choose-temp.c concat.c cp-demangle.c cp-demint.c cplus-dem.c \ > - dyn-string.c errors.c fibheap.c getpwd.c getruntime.c hashtab.c \ > + dyn-string.c fibheap.c getpwd.c getruntime.c hashtab.c \ > hex.c lbasename.c make-temp-file.c md5.c obstack.c partition.c \ > pexecute.c physmem.c splay-tree.c xexit.c xmalloc.c xmemdup.c \ > xstrdup.c xstrerror.c xexit.c > > The routines in errors.c are contained in diagnostic.c, so I couldn't > really see why they were needed, and I guess binutils < 2.15 isn't > happy with having duplicate routines in an archive. > > later, > > Peter. > thanks, now lets see waht the new compiler can do. danny