From owner-freebsd-security Tue Jun 15 14:51:14 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from vidnt2.hq.vid-h2o.org (vista2-blk1-hfc-0251-d1db0de8.rdc1.sdca.coxatwork.com [209.219.13.232]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC76F14D84 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 1999 14:51:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from JDoscher@vid-h2o.org) Received: by VIDNT2 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9) id ; Tue, 15 Jun 1999 14:54:30 -0700 Message-ID: From: Jay Doscher To: 'Tony Lynn' , "'security@FreeBSD.ORG'" Subject: RE: nmap needs bfp ? Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 14:53:50 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Normally nmap does not need root priv's. For certain functions sucj as = OS detection however, you must be root. Jay -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG [mailto:owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Tony Lynn Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 1999 1:29 PM To: security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: nmap needs bfp ? well , I think he didn't run nmap with root priviledge. > > Does nmap need bfp ? > > I was running it on my 3.2 system! > > Suddenly it stop working, complaining it needs bfp, but did it = happen? > > I did not rebuild my kernel, the kernel is the same, i did no = changes to > > the kernel! > Maybe there is another app, that uses bpf. trafshow, ntop are using = bpf. > If so simply increase amount of bpf devices in kernel config file.N...=B2=E6r=B8z=C7vf-=DAj:v?=16=B7=05 =AE =B6=1B=B2=E6r=B8y=FAy=BB=B1=E7=AE+S{y=BA=CA?...=E9=B2=C6 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message