From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 20 00:28:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3C3F106564A for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:28:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john@kozubik.com) Received: from kozubik.com (kozubik.com [216.218.240.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7698A8FC15 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:28:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kozubik.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kozubik.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q0K08ewe077317 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:08:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from john@kozubik.com) Received: from localhost (john@localhost) by kozubik.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id q0K08Zmf077314 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:08:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from john@kozubik.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:08:35 -0800 (PST) From: John Kozubik To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Subject: sanity check: is 9211-8i, on 8.3, with IT firmware still "the one" X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:28:51 -0000 We're about to invest heavily in a new ZFS infrastructure, and our plans are to: - wait for 8.3, with the updated 6gbps mps driver - Install and use LSI 9211-8i cards with newest "IT" firmware This appears to be the de facto standard for ZFS HBAs ... Is there any reason to consider other cards/vendors ? Are these indeed considered solid (provided I use the new mps in 8.3) ? Thanks.