From owner-freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Sun Mar 18 09:28:26 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45A53F68533 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 09:28:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB5D287958 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 09:28:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CDD916473 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 09:28:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w2I9SPVg022721 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 09:28:25 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w2I9SPhI022720 for freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 09:28:25 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 180731] [ipfw] problem with displaying 255.255.255.255 address in ipfw table Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 09:28:24 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: rgrimes@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_severity cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 09:28:26 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D180731 Rodney W. Grimes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|Affects Only Me |Affects Some People CC| |rgrimes@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #4 from Rodney W. Grimes --- This is probably the same as in https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D226688. I understand a desire to have the 255.255.255.255, but this is really a degenerate form in both bug reports of 240.0.0.0/4 as that already covers t= his range in its use, the 255.255.255.255 is not needed in the table in any way= , it servers no additional purpose. The example here though does not include 240/4 for some reason, which it probably should be in the table if they are attempting to block reserved or unlikely to be in use IP addresses. I agree there is a bug, but I also assert that it is a very low priority to spend a great deal of effort to fix. If there is a simple fix in the radix code or an interface error has been made, then great, lets get it fixed. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=