From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 19 19:15:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0657E16A4CE; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 19:15:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B496943D2D; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 19:15:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iBJJF2ww058372; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 11:15:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id iBJJF1wg058371; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 11:15:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 11:15:01 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Alexander Leidinger Message-ID: <20041219191501.GA57249@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200412141913.iBEJDAcl067339@repoman.freebsd.org> <1103120156.41c0471c30b36@netchild.homeip.net> <20041215153759.GA31192@dragon.nuxi.com> <20041218172720.173eca36@Magellan.Leidinger.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041218172720.173eca36@Magellan.Leidinger.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/emulators/linux_base-8 Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 19:15:04 -0000 On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 05:27:20PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > As you can see, the part which would be simplified by a repo copy to > linux_base-7 should vanish into the nirvana in the not so distant future > (not with this patch). > > If there's a strong opinion to have the repo copy as an intermediate > step, I don't object, but I prefer to proceed without it. I still think the repo copy should be done, as it gives special status to the RH7 and if its not the default linux_base, incorrectly so. Doing the repo copy before the isn't needed -- after would be fine too. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)