Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 11:52:36 -0500 From: Vivek Khera <khera@kcilink.com> To: Jud <jud@operamail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Document: 99% (Opera) Message-ID: <15458.45268.518707.60999@onceler.kciLink.com> In-Reply-To: <09EDNDBF0FDTRLFJIZHCWRVQXVKGEC.3c61f028@sparky> References: <200202062002.g16K2WJ84571@onceler.kciLink.com> <09EDNDBF0FDTRLFJIZHCWRVQXVKGEC.3c61f028@sparky>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> "j" == jud <jud@operamail.com> writes: j> 2/6/2002 3:02:32 PM, Vivek Khera <khera@kcilink.com> wrote: j> [snip] >> Why the opera port went to the 6.0-TP series is beyond me -- it j> should >> have stuck with the released version. If anything, an opera-current >> or opera-devel port should have been create for this version. j> Hard to object to having more versions available. However, I'd point out j> the following: I think as a matter of policy, any non-released version should not replace a released version of a port, regardless of its quality. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15458.45268.518707.60999>