Date: Wed, 06 May 2020 19:32:14 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 246266] misc/rfc: resurrect this port -- it should not have been removed Message-ID: <bug-246266-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D246266 Bug ID: 246266 Summary: misc/rfc: resurrect this port -- it should not have been removed Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Keywords: easy, patch, patch-ready Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: portmaster@bsdforge.com Attachment #214207 maintainer-approval+ Flags: Flags: maintainer-feedback+ Created attachment 214207 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D214207&action= =3Dedit svn diff for misc/rfc I'm looking to resurrect this port. It shouldn't have been deleted. I previously made an effort to prevent that. But failed. This pr(1) should correct that. rfc is like man(1) but for rfc's. It's a terminal application. There are 3 files attached to this pr: 1) svn diff from the day before it got nuked. 2) shar archive from after it got nuked. 3) QA log indicating it's success on 13/amd64 CHANGES Makefile MASTER_SITES (changes) MAINTAINER (changes to me) LICENSE (adds) distinfo TIMESTAMP (adds) That's pretty much it. Thanks! --Chris NOTE: given that this was nuked maintainer-feedback is implicit. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-246266-7788>