From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 2 00:32:18 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1B251065674; Mon, 2 Mar 2009 00:32:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) Received: from mout2.freenet.de (mout2.freenet.de [IPv6:2001:748:100:40::2:4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 739B68FC0A; Mon, 2 Mar 2009 00:32:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) Received: from [195.4.92.21] (helo=11.mx.freenet.de) by mout2.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.69 #76) id 1Ldw4v-0007If-4Z; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 01:32:17 +0100 Received: from tfada.t.pppool.de ([89.55.250.218]:64331 helo=ernst.jennejohn.org) by 11.mx.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.69 #76) id 1Ldw4u-0002pk-PM; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 01:32:17 +0100 Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 01:32:14 +0100 From: Gary Jennejohn To: Juergen Lock Message-ID: <20090302013214.51d73098@ernst.jennejohn.org> In-Reply-To: <20090301231316.GA95918@saturn.kn-bremen.de> References: <20090225201550.3d3032b5@ernst.jennejohn.org> <20090228171520.GA56888@saturn.kn-bremen.de> <20090228201650.064c0ee4@ernst.jennejohn.org> <20090228213620.GA64626@saturn.kn-bremen.de> <20090301185709.60194bce@ernst.jennejohn.org> <20090301231316.GA95918@saturn.kn-bremen.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.14.7; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Subject: Re: testing qemu svn r6636 on FreeBSD; future of qemu on FreeBSD... X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gary.jennejohn@freenet.de List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 00:32:19 -0000 On Mon, 2 Mar 2009 00:13:16 +0100 Juergen Lock wrote: > On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 06:57:09PM +0100, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > > Yes it did. It boots without -no-apci and with notpc just fine. > > > You mean notsc, right...? > > > > > > > > > Now I'm thinking about giving the patched qemu-devel another try, since > > > > I've found some workarounds for booting. I'll see whether I can at least > > > > boot into the installed openSUSE using it. > > > > > > > OK, the patched qemu-devel can boot the already installed openSUSE. > > > > I tried it with and without kernel-kqemu and both worked as long as > > I booted with notpc. > > > ..also notsc here? :) > Yes, I meant notsc everywhere :-P --- Gary Jennejohn