From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 7 17:00:05 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFC84682 for ; Sat, 7 Dec 2013 17:00:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3478193D for ; Sat, 7 Dec 2013 17:00:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rB7H05v0030679 for ; Sat, 7 Dec 2013 17:00:05 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id rB7H05b2030678; Sat, 7 Dec 2013 17:00:05 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Resent-Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2013 17:00:05 GMT Resent-Message-Id: <201312071700.rB7H05b2030678@freefall.freebsd.org> Resent-From: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org (GNATS Filer) Resent-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, Christoph Moench-Tegeder Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A65515B0 for ; Sat, 7 Dec 2013 16:54:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.burggraben.net (base.exwg.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:140:50a2::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 631DE18CE for ; Sat, 7 Dec 2013 16:54:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.burggraben.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E79E060008B for ; Sat, 7 Dec 2013 17:54:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.burggraben.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ns.burggraben.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IxMumKnq29J1 for ; Sat, 7 Dec 2013 17:54:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from elch.exwg.net (elch.exwg.net [IPv6:2001:470:7b43:1:6a05:caff:fe01:aae9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "elch.exwg.net", Issuer "Christoph Moench-Tegeder" (verified OK)) by smtp.burggraben.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Sat, 7 Dec 2013 17:54:09 +0100 (CET) Received: by elch.exwg.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CFE4831016; Sat, 7 Dec 2013 17:54:07 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <20131207165407.CFE4831016@elch.exwg.net> Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2013 17:54:07 +0100 (CET) From: Christoph Moench-Tegeder To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.114 Subject: ports/184574: lang/ratfor : fix build with gcc47 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: Christoph Moench-Tegeder List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2013 17:00:05 -0000 >Number: 184574 >Category: ports >Synopsis: lang/ratfor : fix build with gcc47 >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: medium >Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: change-request >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Sat Dec 07 17:00:05 UTC 2013 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Christoph Moench-Tegeder >Release: FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE amd64 >Organization: >Environment: System: FreeBSD elch.exwg.net 9.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE #11 r255911: Fri Sep 27 17:09:40 CEST 2013 cmt@elch.exwg.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ELCH amd64 lang/gcc47 gcc47-4.7.4.20131130 lang/ratfor ratfor-1985.06_3 >Description: Hi, in an effort towards upgrading lang/gcc to gcc 4.7, I'm helping gerald@ in making ports gcc47-safe. Please consider the following patch to your port. If you approve of the patch, gerald@ has offered his help in commiting it. If you're commiting yourself or have someone else commit this (or another patch to the same effect), can you please add an additional reference to ports/183342 in the commit message? In my test environment, the port built successfully with lang/gcc47. >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: A little cleaning up in ratfor's Makefile did the trick here. gcc and make will do the right thing if (now), if you let them. # make and the ports system will pick the right compiler and flags # automatically, if one let's them do so. remove explicit rules from # ratfor's Makefile. $ svn status M Makefile M files/patch-Makefile Index: Makefile =================================================================== --- Makefile (revision 334012) +++ Makefile (working copy) @@ -26,7 +26,6 @@ NO_STAGE= yes post-patch: @cd ${WRKSRC} ; ${PATCH} --quiet < testw.patch - @${REINPLACE_CMD} -e 's|%%F77%%|${F77}|' ${WRKSRC}/Makefile do-install: ${INSTALL_PROGRAM} ${WRKSRC}/ratfor77 ${PREFIX}/bin Index: files/patch-Makefile =================================================================== --- files/patch-Makefile (revision 334012) +++ files/patch-Makefile (working copy) @@ -1,16 +1,22 @@ ---- Makefile~ Sat Jan 13 18:13:44 2007 -+++ Makefile Sat Jan 13 18:14:35 2007 -@@ -28,11 +28,11 @@ +--- Makefile.orig 2013-11-16 17:28:28.000000000 +0100 ++++ Makefile 2013-11-16 17:27:51.000000000 +0100 +@@ -26,13 +26,15 @@ + clean: + rm -f *.o *~ ratfor ratfor77 a.out test testw test.f testw.f - test: ratfor +-test: ratfor ++test: test.f ++ ++test.f: ratfor ./ratfor -o test.f test.r - f77 -o test test.f -+ %%F77%% -o test test.f - testw: ratfor +-testw: ratfor ++testw: testw.f ++ ++testw.f: ratfor ./ratfor -o testw.f testw.r - f77 -o testw testw.f -+ %%F77%% -o testw testw.f tests: test testw ./test Regards, Christoph >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: