From owner-freebsd-chat Wed Sep 3 06:22:58 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id GAA11471 for chat-outgoing; Wed, 3 Sep 1997 06:22:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fallout.campusview.indiana.edu (fallout.campusview.indiana.edu [149.159.1.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id GAA11460 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 1997 06:22:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (jfieber@localhost) by fallout.campusview.indiana.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id IAA09160; Wed, 3 Sep 1997 08:21:57 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 3 Sep 1997 08:21:57 -0500 (EST) From: John Fieber To: Amancio Hasty cc: Mike Smith , Peter Korsten , freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The GUI debate In-Reply-To: <199709030918.CAA00464@rah.star-gate.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 3 Sep 1997, Amancio Hasty wrote: > Actually, if the user base increases due to a very wonderful and > colorful install package perhaps we will have the problem of too > many programmers wanting to hack the install package. So we abandon a majority of our user base because they can't install, then gain a new user base because of a glitzy install package? Just indulge me for a moment: what, exactly, is wrong with the user base we currently have? They don't have cool enough hardware? Speaking of uncool hardware, I recently installed FreeBSD on a 386SL laptop with 6 megabytes of ram and an 80 megabyte hard drive. The formerly useless piece of hardware is now very cool in my mind. :) -john