From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 19 15:16:55 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8DFA58C for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 15:16:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DCF9AE8 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 15:16:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-19-42.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.42]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id t0JFGrlD003618 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 09:16:54 -0600 Message-ID: <54BD215C.3040506@hiwaay.net> Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 09:23:08 -0600 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installing Sublime Text3 on FreeBSD-10.1-i386 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 15:16:55 -0000 On 01/19/15 08:10, Trond Endrestøl wrote: > On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 18:58+0530, Manish Jain wrote: > >> On 01/16/2015 18:31, Trond Endrestøl wrote: >>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2015 18:03+0530, Manish Jain wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Has anyone managed to fully port Sublime Text/Sublime Text3 to >>>> FreeBSD-10.1-i386 ? Running st3 on my system gets me the famous >>>> "GLIBC_2.11 not found" message. >>> These two ports are not native to FreeBSD, but precompiled Linux >>> executables, AFAICT. >>> >>> On my system, editors/sublime{,3} needs: >>> >>> emulators/linux_base-c6 >>> accessibility/linux-c6-atk >>> graphics/linux-c6-cairo >>> textproc/linux-c6-expat >>> x11-fonts/linux-c6-fontconfig >>> graphics/linux-c6-gdk-pixbuf2 >>> x11-toolkits/linux-c6-gtk2 >>> graphics/linux-c6-jpeg >>> x11-toolkits/linux-c6-pango >>> graphics/linux-c6-png >>> graphics/linux-c6-tiff >>> x11/linux-c6-xorg-libs >>> >>> Maybe you should check the condition of the "Linuxulator" ports >>> installed on your system. The above list would be a good start. >> Hi, >> >> I tried installing as per your advice. base-c6 asked me to remove base-f10 >> with 'pkg delete'. That done I installed all the ports in your list. Now >> running 'make install' in sublime3 gives me Error Code 1 : >> >>> linux-sublime-3.0.65 depends on file: /compat/linux/etc/fedora-release - not >>> found >>> ===> Verifying install for /compat/linux/etc/fedora-release in >>> /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f10 >>> >>> ===> linux_base-f10-10_7 conflicts with installed package(s): >>> linux_base-c6-6.6 >>> They will not build together. >> Thanks for any help. > Hum. For some reason it wants the old Fedora stuff on your system, not > the newer CentOS stuff as it wants on my system. > > Is your ports tree up to date? > > What's the contents of /etc/make.conf? > Could it be that the pkg in question needs to be told to use the linux-c6 compatibility stuff, not linux-f10 ? I have had issues on this front in the last 6-8 weeks. Mine eventually got resolved through no effort on my part (including messing around w/ ports tree) except for whining on-list .... It seems that some pkg's need to be told to use the newer linux-compatibility stuff .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr.