Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 17:42:00 -0700 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Jordan Hubbard <jordan.hubbard@gmail.com> Cc: "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: General purpose library for name/value pairs. Message-ID: <CAJ-VmomvwWnjqvzV1g%2BL53vFzxZFsWu2x0q0ERovi9obNo5ybw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CC5D1844-EA9A-4B88-A842-F7F4307458ED@gmail.com> References: <20130704215329.GG1402@garage.freebsd.pl> <20130708213351.GB1405@garage.freebsd.pl> <D2E98A8F-F765-4A56-96CD-4410944A2910@turbofuzz.com> <201307091039.26835.jhb@freebsd.org> <CC5D1844-EA9A-4B88-A842-F7F4307458ED@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 9 July 2013 16:14, Jordan Hubbard <jordan.hubbard@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, for anonymous shms this is certainly true. Hey, if the application = programmer *wants* to just pass a fd reference then there's certainly nothi= ng preventing them from doing so in either case, I'm just suggesting that h= aving an explicit OOB type for shared memory (named or otherwise) can be a = good thing too. You people are evil. I hope you stick to writing gui environments. -adrian ( :-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmomvwWnjqvzV1g%2BL53vFzxZFsWu2x0q0ERovi9obNo5ybw>