From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Oct 25 22:12:18 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from c527597-a.cstvl1.sfba.home.com (c527597-a.cstvl1.sfba.home.com [24.176.204.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ECE237B405; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 22:12:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from bmah@localhost) by c527597-a.cstvl1.sfba.home.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id f9Q5CFS40443; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 22:12:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmah) Message-Id: <200110260512.f9Q5CFS40443@c527597-a.cstvl1.sfba.home.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Mike Barcroft Cc: Bill Fenner , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: import bawk? Re: NO_AWK In-Reply-To: <20011026002659.H93553@coffee.q9media.com> References: <200110250153.f9P1rd0H071528@atg.aciworldwide.com> <20011024211434.G15052@elvis.mu.org> <20011025135022.A80517@dragon.nuxi.com> <200110252300.QAA27628@windsor.research.att.com> <20011026002659.H93553@coffee.q9media.com> Comments: In-reply-to Mike Barcroft message dated "Fri, 26 Oct 2001 00:26:59 -0400." From: "Bruce A. Mah" Reply-To: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG X-Face: g~c`.{#4q0"(V*b#g[i~rXgm*w;:nMfz%_RZLma)UgGN&=j`5vXoU^@n5v4:OO)c["!w)nD/!!~e4Sj7LiT'6*wZ83454H""lb{CC%T37O!!'S$S&D}sem7I[A 2V%N&+ X-Image-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/Images/bmah-cisco-small.gif X-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1469206625P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 22:12:15 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --==_Exmh_1469206625P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii If memory serves me right, Mike Barcroft wrote: > Bill Fenner writes: > > >bawk is license friendly for us. > > > > "without fee" is license friendly for us? > > The way I read it, the "without fee" applies to the "permission", not > the "any purpose." That is, they grant you permission to use it for > any purpose and don't charge you a fee. They don't require your uses > of it be not-for-profit. > > It looks like a reworded 3-clause BSD license to me. :) Rather than us guessing at the meaning (which I feel *is* rather ambiguous), would it make sense for someone to request clarification from some suitable representative of Lucent, telling them exactly what the plans are and asking if they're compatible with the license? The Web page has a pointer to Brian Kernighan...I'm pretty sure he'd know the answer. :-) Bruce. --==_Exmh_1469206625P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.3.1+ 05/14/2001 iD8DBQE72PCv2MoxcVugUsMRAuDbAKDZhIpURRAjjQ/siTgdcGM0rqkCpQCgk4El MpVgeanqKV3DFVEAune0SjA= =XalA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1469206625P-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message