From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jun 17 14:35:39 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3049216A4CE
	for <freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 14:35:39 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from topper.inf.ed.ac.uk (topper.inf.ed.ac.uk [129.215.32.40])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8F7C43D53
	for <freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 14:35:37 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from richard@inf.ed.ac.uk)
Received: from macintosh.inf.ed.ac.uk (macintosh.inf.ed.ac.uk
	[129.215.164.64])
	by topper.inf.ed.ac.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i5HEZIi15738;
	Thu, 17 Jun 2004 15:35:18 +0100
Received: by macintosh.inf.ed.ac.uk (Postfix, from userid 501)
	id E1C0910989F; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 15:35:22 +0100 (BST)
From: Richard Tobin <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk>
To: Greg Lewis <glewis@eyesbeyond.com>,
	Richard Tobin <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: Greg Lewis's message of Thu, 17 Jun 2004 08:01:49 -0600
Organization: just say no
X-Mailer: Ream 5.1.51-richard-mac
Message-Id: <20040617143522.E1C0910989F@macintosh.inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 15:35:22 +0100 (BST)
cc: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Java plugin problem with firefox
X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD <freebsd-java.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java>,
	<mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-java>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-java@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java>,
	<mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 14:35:39 -0000

> Hmmm, were the jdk and firefox compiled with different versions of g++?

No, I rebuilt the jdk port to bring it up to date after getting the
error, but it made no difference.

> You could try jdk14.  No guarantees though.

I'll give it a try this evening.

-- Richard