Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 18:58:26 +0300 From: pluknet <pluknet@gmail.com> To: "Andrey V. Elsukov" <bu7cher@yandex.ru>, "Eugene Grosbein" <eugen@kuzbass.ru> Cc: Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ipfw2.c,v 1.76.2.17 Message-ID: <a31046fc0812020758h557b4991k67d4ea0b9cad539b@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <427101228232910@webmail19.yandex.ru> References: <a31046fc0812020702r2a3e5241m1844f137c4cf66a@mail.gmail.com> <427101228232910@webmail19.yandex.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2008/12/2 Andrey V. Elsukov <bu7cher@yandex.ru>: > 02.12.08, 18:02, "pluknet" <pluknet@gmail.com>: >> Since this revision (appeared in 6.3) I think ipfw violates POLA. >> I mean "ipfw table N list" shows values of table in Internet '.' notation. >> A friend of mine was surprised to found Internet representation >> of this "optional 32-bit unsigned value". >> For example security/bruteblock stores unix timestamps here >> and AFAICS there is no possibility to come back to the previous >> output format (other than reverting this revision). > > It fixed in 1.76.2.21. > > -- > WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov > Andrey, Eugene. Thank you all! And please forgive me my laziness, not allowed to check up last revisions of ipfw2.c. -- wbr, pluknet
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a31046fc0812020758h557b4991k67d4ea0b9cad539b>