Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 09:39:57 +0300 From: Igor Robul <igor@raduga.dyndns.org> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: OT: Which programming shell, sh or csh? Message-ID: <20010226093957.A1988@linux.rainbow> In-Reply-To: <20010223153105.A17466@tethys.valhalla.net>; from mark.drayton@4thwave.co.uk on Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 03:31:05PM %2B0000 References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0102231016020.3063-100000@www.bellnetworks.net> <20010223153105.A17466@tethys.valhalla.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 03:31:05PM +0000, Mark Drayton wrote: > > I am writing some small scripts for our users to help them interact > > with cvs. I have looked at using either sh or csh, but I cannot find > > any information as to why I would choose one over the other. > > I've never used csh myself, but I've read several documents saying it > shouldn't be used. See Tom Christiansen's article for more info: Most of _my own_ scripts are written in csh. But generally, sh is better for programming than csh. -- Igor Robul, Unix System Administrator & Programmer @ sanatorium "Raduga", Sochi, Russia http://www.brainbench.com/transcript.jsp?pid=304744 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010226093957.A1988>