From owner-freebsd-qa@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jun 20 06:07:16 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-qa@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-qa@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-qa@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C891F16A474
	for <freebsd-qa@freebsd.org>; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 06:07:16 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from christian.perrier@onera.fr)
Received: from onera.onera.fr (onera.onera.fr [144.204.65.4])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FE5043D48
	for <freebsd-qa@freebsd.org>; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 06:07:15 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from christian.perrier@onera.fr)
Received: from cc-mykerinos.onera (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by onera.onera.fr  with ESMTP id k5K672Lr010487;
	Tue, 20 Jun 2006 08:07:02 +0200 (MEST)
Received: by cc-mykerinos.onera (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id E3A6940A292; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 07:09:37 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 07:09:37 +0200
From: Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org>
To: Jari Aalto <jari.aalto@cante.net>, 366546-quiet@bugs.debian.org,
	374525@bugs.debian.org
Message-ID: <20060620050937.GB18750@djedefre.onera>
References: <20060509153807.16297.97467.reportbug@cante>
	<E1FsDxt-0001DV-Nv@cante> <E1FsQpg-0002x9-8H@cante>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E1FsQpg-0002x9-8H@cante>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403
Cc: 366545-quiet@bugs.debian.org, anibal@debian.org,
	366541-quiet@bugs.debian.org, mstone@debian.org, freebsd-qa@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Bug#366546: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
X-BeenThere: freebsd-qa@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: 374525@bugs.debian.org
List-Id: FreeBSD Quality Assurance <freebsd-qa.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-qa>,
	<mailto:freebsd-qa-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-qa>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-qa@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-qa-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-qa>,
	<mailto:freebsd-qa-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 06:07:16 -0000


--Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

> I've CC'd packages where I've been advogating nologin in Debian. The
> binary is not yet widely used, so just move it so that we can get full
> potential of nologin to forthcoming etch.

Agreed.

> =20
> | I think that this suggestion should go to upstream as well. Having
> | nologin in /bin does not make sense only for Debian, of course.
> |=20
> | Tomasz?
>=20
> Than would be FreeBSD devel list. I'm not sure which list, but I've
> added CC to:
>=20
>     freebsd-qa@freebsd.org

Tomasz (shadow upstream) mentioned me that nologin lies in /sbin in
OpenBSD so that he's tempted to default installing it there.

As already mentioned elsewhere, I have no strong opinion on this for
what to do in Debian and I'm ready to listen to suggestions and
various rationales....


> =20
> | Jari, I'm OK with you cloning this bug report and reassign a "please
> | move nologin to /bin" bug to login.
>=20
> created new one.
>=20
>   http://bugs.debian.org/374525


CC'ing that specific bug.....and restricting the Reply-To field so
that we avoid CC'ing the whole world for this. People who want to be kept
informed about this, please request to be CC'ed specifically.



--Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEl4MR1OXtrMAUPS0RAqfzAJ9LxW7Nx5B70obvT0tM55Xw0o9a/wCbBz5Y
RVB47OM+hCi//ZN1WfmMBbg=
=Ko42
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE--