Date: Sat, 4 Jul 1998 10:05:20 +0930 From: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> To: Gary Harris <gharris@wr.com.au>, freebsd-newbies@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sio0&sio1 Message-ID: <19980704100520.V358@freebie.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <199807031353.XAA24554@mail.wr.com.au>; from Gary Harris on Fri, Jul 03, 1998 at 11:48:57PM %2B1000 References: <19980701233857.32018@tetard.glou.eu.org>; <19980702084248.M10452@freebie.lemis.com> <199807031353.XAA24554@mail.wr.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday, 3 July 1998 at 23:48:57 +1000, Gary Harris wrote: > >>>> or 2.2.6. During the bootstrap process Free tells that sio0 and sio1 not >>>> found at its IRQ3 and 4. Thus serial ports not available on this computer >>> >>> Probably same problem as Iwill motherboards. Check >>> http://www.lemis.com/serial-port-patch.html >> >> I'd assume so. Note that the problem has been fixed in -stable and >> -current (as the web page now indicates). > > More info please. I can't find any reference on the FreeBSD website and I have the same problem. (reformatting line to be under 80 chars) > More info please. I can't find any reference on the FreeBSD website > and I have the same problem. In general, these things don't get announced except in the cvs-all mailing list, where *all* the changes (90% of them ridiculously trivial) get reported. Here are some relevant commit records for /usr/src/sys/i386/isa/sio.c: > revision 1.205 > date: 1998/06/03 12:30:10; author: bde; state: Exp; lines: +5 -4 > Force success of the probe (after doing it as before except in one > miscconfigured case) if the port is the console. This fixes several > bugs: > - if all sioprobe()s failed, then the console driver followed null > pointers in cdevsw[]. > - if the sioprobe() for the console failed but another sioprobe() > succeeded, then init hung early when the console couldn't be > opened. > - it was silly for the console to not be there after printing boot > messages on it. > Bugs introduced by this are hopefully no worse than old ones caused > by forcing the success of the `cn' level probe. > ---------------------------- > revision 1.204 > date: 1998/06/03 09:43:38; author: bde; state: Exp; lines: +6 -7 > Fixed a printf() arg botch in the previous commit. > > Only complain about an irq mismatch in the probe if the configured > irq doesn't become active, and then print the bitmap of irqs that > became active (including clock irqs) instead of just the first > (not including clock irqs). > > Bugs reported by: msmith > ---------------------------- > revision 1.203 > date: 1998/05/31 10:53:55; author: bde; state: Exp; lines: +27 -22 > Converted the ICU-level interrupt tests (3, 5 and 8) in sioprobe() into > a test of the irq number, and made failure of this test non-fatal. > Removed related unused complications for the APIC_IO case. Removed the > no-test3 flag. > > Deverbosified the failure messages for the other tests. Removed the > per-port verbose flag - just use the general verbose flag. > > revision 1.147.2.16 > date: 1998/06/16 12:51:17; author: bde; state: Exp; lines: +33 -25 > MFC (sio.c revs.1.203-1.205 and 1.207 and infrastructure: made > tests 3, 5 and 8 non-fatal, etc). This may fix failing probes for > builtin ports on IWill motherboards. The relevant tags are: > head: 1.208 > symbolic names: > RELENG_2_2_6_RELEASE: 1.147.2.13 > RELENG_2_2: 1.147.0.2 This says that the fixes are in RELENG_2_2 (2.2-STABLE), which is currently at revision 1.147.2.16, but not in 2.2.6-RELEASE (revision 1.147.2.13). It's also in -CURRENT. Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980704100520.V358>