From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Apr 28 14:03:36 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7321E37B401
	for <threads@freebsd.org>; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 14:03:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 841EF43F3F
	for <threads@freebsd.org>; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 14:03:35 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com)
Received: from pcnet1.pcnet.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.pcnet.com (8.12.8/8.12.1) with ESMTP id h3SL3QBg011303;
	Mon, 28 Apr 2003 17:03:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (eischen@localhost)h3SL3QFo011300;
	Mon, 28 Apr 2003 17:03:26 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 17:03:26 -0400 (EDT)
From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0304281347090.45358-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10304281700200.10618-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: threads@freebsd.org
cc: Vallo Kallaste <kalts@estpak.ee>
Subject: Re: libkse report (fwd)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD <freebsd-threads.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>,
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-threads>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-threads@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>,
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 21:03:36 -0000

On Mon, 28 Apr 2003, Julian Elischer wrote:

> Quite a positive report..
> Maybe if the latest patches are checked in, it may even do better.

Yup, I'm working on it.  Should be sometime today.

BTW, mozilla worked for me after the first set of changes.
I'll have to try it again now that I have access again to
the machine with it installed.

> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 23:08:56 +0300
> From: Vallo Kallaste <kalts@estpak.ee>
> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
> Subject: Re: libthr broken
> 
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2003 at 01:47:09PM -0700, Julian Elischer
> <julian@elischer.org> wrote:
> 
> > THEORETICALLY it should be as simple as this:
> > 
> > cd /usr/src/lib/libpthread
> > make 
> > make install. (will install as libkse at this time)
> > cd /usr/lib
> > mv libc_r.so.xx libc_r.so.xx.hold
> > mv libkse.so.?? libc_r.so.xx
> 
> KNode works and it seems the bug I had with libthr is gone. It has
> other problems, however, which I never had before. For some reason
> KNode thinks, after I've saved newly composed text to tempfile, that
> external editor is still running and no text is transferred from
> tempfile to KNode own editor window. KNode process remains in memory
> after closing, taking some 24MB of memory. Mozilla and Phoenix will
> not start up any window, they're show up in top listing, take usual
> amount of memory and are not killable by TERM signal, only SIGKILL.
> But overall, libpthread (libkse) is in better shape than I thought.
> The fact that KDE got up and KNode is usable, is quite a wonder.
> -- 
> 
> Vallo Kallaste

-- 
Dan Eischen