Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 06:53:43 -0700 From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Larry Rosenman <ler@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r431156 - in head/www: . miniminiweb Message-ID: <0E2CA482-E13E-461F-B8DE-B9E9A8FB2DEC@adamw.org> In-Reply-To: <20170111133702.GA36222@FreeBSD.org> References: <201701110304.v0B34f5u031359@repo.freebsd.org> <20170111133702.GA36222@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 11 Jan, 2017, at 6:37, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >=20 > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 03:04:41AM +0000, Larry Rosenman wrote: >> New Revision: 431156 >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/431156 >>=20 >> Log: >> New Port www/miniminiweb >>=20 >> MiniMiniWeb is my attempt at creating a multithreaded web server in = C. >>=20 >> Features (and Misfeatures) >>=20 >> Written in C >> Multithreaded (with pthread) >> Designed for Unix-like systems >> Supports GET and POST requests >> Only serves static files >> No SSL >> No CGI or anything "dynamic" >> No Virtual Hosts >> No Directory Listings (gotten pulled out) >> No IPv6 >=20 > May I ask what makes it useful to be included in the Ports Collection? > There're plenty of different production-quality webservers already > available, and mind that we don't just go and port whatever project we > find on GitHub without sufficiently strong rationale. Neither port's > description nor PR did answer this question. It's got a very, very small footprint, a very narrow feature-set, and is = reasonably performant. I found that combination pretty attractive. # Adam --=20 Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0E2CA482-E13E-461F-B8DE-B9E9A8FB2DEC>