Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 2 Aug 2008 22:35:40 +0200
From:      mcassar <marshc187@gmail.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: gemeral questions (noobish)
Message-ID:  <200808022235.40815.marshc187@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <18580.47343.395943.288119@jerusalem.litteratus.org>
References:  <200808021550.48302.marshc187@gmail.com> <g725v7$fua$1@ger.gmane.org> <18580.47343.395943.288119@jerusalem.litteratus.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday 02 August 2008 21:43:43 Robert Huff wrote:
> Michael Powell writes:
> >  I can only speak to cvsup or csup (which I use) but I'd like to point
> > out a very common mistake wrt either. It is a good idea to have two
> > different sup files, as they will need to download different collections
> > of material. For example this:
> >
> >  *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_7_0
> >  src-all
> >
> >  combination will pull down the system sources for the security updates
> > to RELEASE. Read in the Handbook about the tags and collections.
> >
> >  I keep a separate sup file for keeping the ports tree updated and the
> >  difference is here:
> >
> >  *default release=cvs tag=.
> >  ports-all
>
> 	I have a file for src-, one for ports-, and one for doc-.
>
>
> 				Robert Huff

so most of you _do_ use or prefer csup/cvsup more than portsnap, right? 



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200808022235.40815.marshc187>