Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 11:02:11 +0900 (JST) From: Mori Hiroki <yamori813@yahoo.co.jp> To: Norman Gray <norman@astro.gla.ac.uk>, "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: SoC with multiple ethernet ports Message-ID: <112641.90199.qm@web101703.mail.ssk.yahoo.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <12078642-77BD-4B96-87F0-4B777EABA252@astro.gla.ac.uk> References: <12078642-77BD-4B96-87F0-4B777EABA252@astro.gla.ac.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi.=0A=0AMy port of OLD Ralink arm soc that is RT1310 have two port first e= thernet=0Ainterface. My target of RT1310 is Buffalo WZR2-G300N that is one = port is=0Adirect=A0to out and other one is connect to icplus switch.=0A=0A#= ifconfig -a=0Afv0: flags=3D8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> me= tric 0 mtu 1500=0A=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 ether 00:1a:f1:01:1f:23=0A=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0= inet 10.10.10.40 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.10.10.255=A0=0A=A0 =A0 = =A0 =A0 media: Ethernet autoselect=0A=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 status: active=0Afv1: = flags=3D8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500=0A= =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 ether 00:1a:f1:01:1f:24=0A=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 inet 10.0.1.123 n= etmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.1.255=A0=0A=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 media: Ethernet= autoselect=0A=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 status: active=0Alo0: flags=3D8049<UP,LOOPBAC= K,RUNNING,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 16384=0A=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 options=3D600003<= RXCSUM,TXCSUM,RXCSUM_IPV6,TXCSUM_IPV6>=0A=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 inet 127.0.0.1 net= mask 0xff000000=A0=0A=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 groups: lo=A0=0A# etherswitchcfg -v=0A= etherswitch0: IC+ IP17x switch driver with 5 ports and 16 VLAN groups=0Aeth= erswitch0: VLAN capabilities=3D6<PORT,DOT1Q>=0Aetherswitch0: VLAN mode: DOT= 1Q=0Aport0:=0A=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 pvid: 1=0A=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 flags=3D0<>=0A=A0 = =A0 =A0 =A0 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>)=0A=A0 =A0 = =A0 =A0 status: active=0Aport1:=0A=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 pvid: 1=0A=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0= flags=3D0<>=0A=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-= duplex>)=0A=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 status: active=0Aport2:=0A=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 pvid: = 1=0A=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 flags=3D0<>=0A=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 media: Ethernet autoselec= t (none)=0A=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 status: no carrier=0Aport3:=0A=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 pv= id: 1=0A=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 flags=3D0<>=0A=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 media: Ethernet autos= elect (none)=0A=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 status: no carrier=0Aport4:=0A=A0 =A0 =A0 = =A0 pvid: 1=0A=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 flags=3D1<CPUPORT>=0A=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 media: E= thernet 100baseTX <full-duplex>=0A=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 status: active=0Avlangrou= p0:=0A=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 vlan: 1=0A=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 members 0,1,2,3,4=0A=0AThis= is recent dmesg.=0A=0Ahttps://gist.github.com/yamori813/88224f1c96c9c592fb= 611b12a15e4ab5=0A=0A=0AReview is here.=0A=0Ahttps://reviews.freebsd.org/D72= 38=0A=0A=0A----- Original Message -----=0A> From: Norman Gray <norman@astro= .gla.ac.uk>=0A> To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org=0A> Cc: =0A> Date: 2017/4/6, Th= u 00:26=0A> Subject: SoC with multiple ethernet ports=0A> =0A> =0A> Greetin= gs.=0A> =0A> I'm looking for a SoC (or other small) machine to act as a gat= eway between =0A> two physical networks (in fact, an ordinary one and an IP= MI).=A0 Thus I'm =0A> looking for such a device which has at least two ethe= rnet interfaces, and can =0A> run FreeBSD.=0A> =0A> There are multiple boar= ds listed at =0A> <https://wiki.freebsd.org/FreeBSD/arm>, but the boards un= der the 'Well =0A> supported boards' headings appear only to have single in= terfaces (though I =0A> wouldn't claim an exhaustive search).=0A> =0A> I ca= n see what appear to be nice multiple-interface boards at =0A> <https://www= .solid-run.com/marvell-armada-family/>, but they're listed =0A> under 'unkn= own support'.=A0 I can see some notes on some Marvell boards at =0A> <https= ://wiki.freebsd.org/FreeBSDMarvell>, but these refer to FreeBSD 8.x =0A> an= d 9-CURRENT, so are clearly not up-to-date.=0A> =0A> Searching the list arc= hives, I find =0A> <https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/2015-Fe= bruary/010300.html> =0A> that at least some people are using 11.0-CURRENT o= n an Armada/Marvell board, but =0A> (given that that's a bug report) I'm no= t sure if that usage counts as =0A> ...Brave or not.=0A> =0A> There's clear= ly a lot of hardware possibilities here, but I surely can't =0A> be the fir= st person to want such a device.=A0 Does anyone on this list have any =0A> = advice?=0A> =0A> Best wishes,=0A> =0A> Norman=0A> =0A> =0A> -- Norman Gray= =A0 :=A0 https://nxg.me.uk=0A>; SUPA School of Physics and Astronomy, Univer= sity of Glasgow, UK=0A> _______________________________________________=0A>= freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list=0A> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman= /listinfo/freebsd-arm=0A> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-uns= ubscribe@freebsd.org"=0A>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?112641.90199.qm>