From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jun  7 19:24:39 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D15F6106566B
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Mon,  7 Jun 2010 19:24:39 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from bf1783@googlemail.com)
Received: from mail-ww0-f54.google.com (mail-ww0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B7C28FC1D
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Mon,  7 Jun 2010 19:24:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wwb22 with SMTP id 22so3783725wwb.13
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 12:24:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:reply-to:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
	bh=zDbIHcl69X5EK1QUfvEsc0sYiUGsiOxPY+qoREHzl8E=;
	b=JvqR6DFnt430WJZhuoPq0RS3z5aDc7t/z5wFiuTTrCdnh+BzyrsLno5w1O/MNpAKEH
	KIddBS9pyrxGzMNUjDXTO3Icr4xpP5ZudB6HVO+ko1xNSvDbzTnSVgWNyqojzaFp9QzO
	emEQRjtexV6yYbBBict565Wk0kn4M6rJMhZ2g=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc
	:content-type;
	b=SxHbo69FdvBDav3SOWxB6Stv6HbSAlQKxnTgm5GMPIAC/sFOumDsppURcXBBRljXEI
	OG+eyK/XyZJXgi+/7X+HSc0CgDMkCW1JLEhHE8WTDtQxcInRCwfydO4peWhnXIQMbJA6
	wbkjSQuJ+dUSwrWp2LCAOYtGKnu9BOzrtKOd8=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.227.145.77 with SMTP id c13mr14202028wbv.140.1275938676204; 
	Mon, 07 Jun 2010 12:24:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.183.5 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Jun 2010 12:24:36 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 19:24:36 +0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTin_Y77WLceQk4A4KUc5AYi4FUkCmf7BO64QdG-1@mail.gmail.com>
From: "b. f." <bf1783@googlemail.com>
To: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: security/tor and WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: bf1783@gmail.com
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 19:24:39 -0000

>Why we need uncoditional WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes in security/tor?
>It builds fine on 8-stable with base system openssl.
>
>Moreover this setting isn't needed on -CURRENT because openssl 1.0 is in
>base system. May be it should be removed from port's Makefile?

You are right that it no longer should be unconditional, but not that
it should be removed altogether.  Remember, although you may be
running a recent version of 8-stable, with openssl 0.9.8n, others may
still be using older, but still supported, versions of the FreeBSD,
with older base system openssl.

And, as far as I know, openssl 1.0 is _not_ in the base system, even
in -CURRENT.  We are still at 0.9.8n.

Anyway, I think Martin planned to fix this, now that __FreeBSD_version
has been bumped after some recent changes.

Regards,
                 b.