From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 0:19:41 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from glatton.cnchost.com (glatton.cnchost.com [207.155.248.47]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2058837B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 00:19:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from praxis@techpraxis.com) Received: from [64.221.116.130] (w130.z064221116.sea-wa.dsl.cnc.net [64.221.116.130]) by glatton.cnchost.com id DAA19241; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 03:19:39 -0500 (EST) [ConcentricHost SMTP Relay 1.10] User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/9.0.2509 Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 00:19:41 -0800 Subject: Any luck with BIND 9? From: Forrest To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG When installing the BIND 9 port, do you have to deinstall the BIND 8 port? The announcement for BIND 9 says that certain programs still require libraries contained within 8. Any of you out there successfully running BIND 9 on a 4.2-STABLE or 4.3-BETA system? What procedure did you go through when enabling BIND 9? Thanks Forrest To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 2:55:53 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from trill.hh.se (trill.hh.se [194.47.5.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F13C737B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 02:55:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from u98jobj@stud.hh.se) Received: from gs177.gsten.hh.se (chip@L22-212.gsten.hh.se [194.47.16.177]) by trill.hh.se (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA22409; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 11:55:35 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3AAA7FD2.8F9262E5@daemons.aregreat.net> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 11:55:36 +0100 (CET) From: Joel Bjork To: lazy Subject: RE: Quake2 (not as a server) Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 10-Mar-01 lazy wrote: > I've searched the net for a pages on getting Quake2 working under > FreeBSD, but none of them have worked out. I really don't want to, > but I might give up my FreeBSD box for Linux just so I can play > Quake2. I don't want to run a dedicated server (which I actually can > do). No matter what I do with it (using the Linux patch) I get some > error, and if I can fix that error I simply get a new one. > > -- Following the guide at www.linuxquake.com worked for me. ---------------------------------- E-Mail: Joel Bjork Date: 11-Mar-01 Time: 11:55:36 ---------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 3:30:25 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from bugs.elitsat.net (bugs.elitsat.net [209.239.78.230]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5809837B719 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 03:30:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from amour@bugs.elitsat.net) Received: from localhost (amour@localhost) by bugs.elitsat.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2BBTl500690 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 13:29:50 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from amour@bugs.elitsat.net) Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 13:29:45 +0200 (EET) From: Alexander To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: IPSEC Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG What is the usual way to create tunnel between 2 gateways ? I've read some howtos that I found on some bsd sites and there is said about encrypting already made tunnel but nowhere is said how to create that tunnel ? (like brining up tun0 devices) I also found howto about pipsecd but it doesn't work. Somehow when I compile "options IPSEC" in the kernel the pipsecd doesn't want to run. It tells me that it can't get SOCK_RAW And when I remove IPSEC from the kernel it doesn't work propertly. I configure both sides of the tunnel and run pipsecd and it tells me that hmac authorization failed. (and the configs on both sides are correct, keys are correct, I took them from a working howto) I also read about making tunnel using ppp and encrypting it with ssh but it sux. There should be other way because there is alot of howtos about IPSEC and the pipsecd and ppp with ssh doesn't include it. ( I mean setting your keys with setkey and running racoon etc..) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 4:35:35 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mta06-svc.ntlworld.com (mta06-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.46]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AECC337B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 04:35:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jon@witchspace.com) Received: from witchspace.com ([213.105.80.222]) by mta06-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.02.27 201-229-119-110) with ESMTP id <20010311123524.EVEC285.mta06-svc.ntlworld.com@witchspace.com> for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 12:35:24 +0000 Message-ID: <3AAB7231.20100@witchspace.com> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 07:40:17 -0500 From: Jonathan Belson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386; en-US; m18) Gecko/20010131 Netscape6/6.01 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Missing mail/news on netscape 6 port? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hiya I've been trying to access the mail and news facilities on linux-netscape6. Although I can get the mail composer to appear by typing 'mailto:whomever' in the address bar, the mail and news windows are not accessible from the 'Tasks' menu or from the task bar at the bottom. Is anyone else experiencing this or is my netscape installation knackered? Cheers, -- C-YA Jon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 4:40:13 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from beta.root-servers.ch (beta.root-servers.ch [195.49.33.19]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D4E5137B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 04:40:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gabriel_ambuehl@buz.ch) Received: (qmail 97771 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2001 12:40:02 -0000 Received: from dclient106-69.hispeed.ch (HELO work.root.li) (62.2.106.69) by beta.root-servers.ch with SMTP; 11 Mar 2001 12:40:02 -0000 Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 13:41:33 +0100 From: Gabriel Ambuehl X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.51) Educational Organization: BUZ Internet Services X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <119597798298.20010311134133@buz.ch> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: SSH port forwarding: can I deactivate forwarding to remote hosts but still allow it on to the ports on the server? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hello, I'm a bit worried about the port forwarding feature of OpenSSH: while it is definitively cool for many uses (many of them I'm just in the process to think about), I can see one big problem about it: users which only got SFTP enabled for their accounts can still use it which is basically fine (as it would allow for cheap and cheerful secured POP and SMTP services) but it makes me worrying about the fact that they can also forward to a remote host from the server and thus could use it as a proxy for tons of malicious things. For said reasons, I don't want to deactivate it entirely but I'd very like to have it limited to the local ports of the server, i.e. User: IP1 Server: IP2 so the user can only use user@ip1$ ssh -L XX:IP2:YY user@IP2 but not user@ip1$ ssh -L XX:IP3:YY user@IP2 reading through the OpenSSH docs, I only found an option to deactivate the feature completely which is not exactly what I'd want. In theory, this problem could be solved partly [1] by very restrictive firewall but I'd really prefer a solution which stops the trouble before it starts (as the firewall will stop it just after the user wanted to start the trouble). [1] completely isn't possible IMHO since the server needs some outgoing ports open to be able to use DNS and SMTP which the users then could use for his purposes. Best regards, Gabriel -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.0.2i iQEVAwUBOqtkccZa2WpymlDxAQFUBggAvo2Dh0fN8fW6fqiFYyCFuWI8fIoNNsBH NxXv/TYzVu4QyV2iyS+X7s6j3lFyDBz1hrGrnIrA7sDsY7vRUXmlSj6tyVw26FmL kqmvtMBStsAtlGVFGprpCZ6LyLTJvdY9EW1xiv6VGX9Zg0rHlcphzlIqEGudgPDU StEf+f0V7Ig26eck93EY1JnziJySCSMgqUnLPMhg/A9sDVgcYe1iNvKKIcYZMibP vVZX1BTCj66mPf8a//oA6YrLWU5zrfUywySwIff5Cs14wIhXM+PRQ5SzqxLb0tvl rPHrrKpi6UUhvD0ggw54rNiLNnuSlVmPfspQTijEGB1WJifY+QULMg== =+poc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 4:42: 0 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-158.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.158]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9C3B37B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 04:41:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D945966F11; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 04:41:54 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 04:41:54 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Rami AlZaid Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /usr/local Message-ID: <20010311044154.A55175@mollari.cthul.hu> References: <5.1.0.10.2.20010310221626.06b03758@mail.alzaid.com> <5.1.0.10.2.20010310221626.06b03758@mail.alzaid.com> <20010310192416.A3232@mollari.cthul.hu> <5.1.0.10.2.20010310230706.02ec7638@209.48.90.3> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.10.2.20010310230706.02ec7638@209.48.90.3>; from lists@alzaid.com on Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 11:11:54PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Some ports hard-code /usr/local, you are correct. They're broken, though, and you should use send-pr to report any you find (one PR per port so they can be assigned separately to maintainers) Kris On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 11:11:54PM -0500, Rami AlZaid wrote: > Thanks but this helped for avoiding the use of PREFIX=3D/usr/localports b= ut=20 > it didn't help for the header files. I tried it with the pine4 port and i= t=20 > still looked under /usr/local/include. this is the part where it looked= =20 > under /usr/local/include: > cc -O -pipe -DDEBUG -DBSDI -DSYSTYPE=3D\"BSF\" -DMOUSE=20 > -I/usr/local/include -c addrbook.c >=20 >=20 >=20 > At 10:24 PM 3/10/2001, you wrote: > >Set LOCALBASE in /etc/make.conf or in your environment. > > >=20 > Rami AlZaid * ICQ # 1071118 > WebPages: www.alzaid.com * www.kuwait.nu * www.wooyeah.com >=20 >=20 > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message >=20 --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6q3KSWry0BWjoQKURApIoAJ0Qf6t/ND7v+2MkRADfZDmkw6DsIACghSxO UwR54xKz3tClhYvj7sU4KSc= =757c -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 4:57:25 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from kremvax.demos.su (kremvax.demos.su [194.87.0.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7118437B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 04:57:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rusig.ru!der@kremvax.demos.su) Received: by kremvax.demos.su (8.6.13/D) from 73.10.133.195.dynamic.dialup.ru [195.133.10.73] for with ESMTP id PAA00927; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 15:56:42 +0300 Received: (from root@localhost) by signal-gate.rusig.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA04342 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 15:42:11 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from der@rusig.ru) Received: from rusig.ru (Derevyanko.rusig.ru [192.9.200.29]) by signal-gate.rusig.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA04213; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 15:42:05 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from der@rusig.ru) Message-ID: <3AAB7162.D1638B02@rusig.ru> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 15:36:50 +0300 From: Alexandre Derevyanko X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Digital 21140 Fast Ethernet Card in 100 megabit mode Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------6B8D3B0687B57F0605FD3FC2" X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1-pre3 (http://amavis.org/) Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------6B8D3B0687B57F0605FD3FC2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello ! I have a problems with Digital 21140 Fast Ethernet card. It doesn't work correctly on any media except 10baseT/UTP half-duplex. Computer is Dell OptiPlex GXMT 5100, 32Mb RAM. FreeBSD 3.4 Release. Except this ethernet card, no other expansion card inserted. >From dmesg output: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ de0: rev 0x12 int a irq 11 on pci0.13.0 de0: SMC 9332DST 21140 [10-100Mb/s] pass 1.2 de0: address 00:00:c0:94:9e:d0 de0: enabling 10baseT port ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Today i tryes to attach this card to our newly bought switch SMS-EZ1016DT. I can make the 100 megabit light to lit by "ifconfig de0 media 100baseTX", but transfer rate drop to 76 kbytes/sec. I can't make full-dumplex light to lit, although "ifconfig mediaopt full-duplex" succeed without errors, but transfer rate doesn't change. It is curious, because if card think that it's full-duplex and switch think that it's half-duplex it will doesn't work at all, isn't it ? I tryes to make 10baseT/UTP full-duplex, but transfer rate still 76 kbyte/sec. Only in 10baseT/UTP half-duplex transfer rate went to ~ 700 kbytes\sec. Does anybody have something to say about this case ? P.S. Switch works correctly for other computers, in 10baseT and 100baseTX full-duplex mode. Regards, Alexander. --------------6B8D3B0687B57F0605FD3FC2 Content-Type: application/x-unknown-content-type-out_auto_file; name="dmesg.out" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline; filename="dmesg.out" Q29weXJpZ2h0IChjKSAxOTkyLTE5OTkgRnJlZUJTRCBJbmMuCkNvcHlyaWdodCAoYykgMTk4 MiwgMTk4NiwgMTk4OSwgMTk5MSwgMTk5MwoJVGhlIFJlZ2VudHMgb2YgdGhlIFVuaXZlcnNp dHkgb2YgQ2FsaWZvcm5pYS4gQWxsIHJpZ2h0cyByZXNlcnZlZC4KRnJlZUJTRCAzLjQtUkVM RUFTRSAjMjogVHVlIFNlcCAyNiAxMDo0MjoyMiBNU0QgMjAwMAogICAgZGVyQHNpZ25hbC1n YXRlOi91c3Ivc3JjL3N5cy9jb21waWxlL1NJR05BTC1HQVRFClRpbWVjb3VudGVyICJpODI1 NCIgIGZyZXF1ZW5jeSAxMTkzMTgyIEh6ClRpbWVjb3VudGVyICJUU0MiICBmcmVxdWVuY3kg OTk3MTYzNDMgSHoKQ1BVOiBQZW50aXVtL1A1NEMgKDk5LjcyLU1IeiA1ODYtY2xhc3MgQ1BV KQogIE9yaWdpbiA9ICJHZW51aW5lSW50ZWwiICBJZCA9IDB4NTI2ICBTdGVwcGluZyA9IDYK ICBGZWF0dXJlcz0weDFiZjxGUFUsVk1FLERFLFBTRSxUU0MsTVNSLE1DRSxDWDg+CnJlYWwg bWVtb3J5ICA9IDI1MTY1ODI0ICgyNDU3NksgYnl0ZXMpCmNvbmZpZz4gcQphdmFpbCBtZW1v cnkgPSAyMTk1NDU2MCAoMjE0NDBLIGJ5dGVzKQpQcmVsb2FkZWQgZWxmIGtlcm5lbCAia2Vy bmVsIiBhdCAweGMwMjlmMDAwLgpQcmVsb2FkZWQgdXNlcmNvbmZpZ19zY3JpcHQgIi9ib290 L2tlcm5lbC5jb25mIiBhdCAweGMwMjlmMDljLgpQcm9iaW5nIGZvciBkZXZpY2VzIG9uIFBD SSBidXMgMDoKY2hpcDA6IDxJbnRlbCA4MjQzN0ZYIFBDSSBjYWNoZSBtZW1vcnkgY29udHJv bGxlcj4gcmV2IDB4MDIgb24gcGNpMC4wLjAKY2hpcDE6IDxJbnRlbCA4MjM3MUZCIFBDSSB0 byBJU0EgYnJpZGdlPiByZXYgMHgwMiBvbiBwY2kwLjcuMAppZGVfcGNpMDogPEludGVsIFBJ SVggQnVzLW1hc3RlciBJREUgY29udHJvbGxlcj4gcmV2IDB4MDIgb24gcGNpMC43LjEKZGUw OiA8RGlnaXRhbCAyMTE0MCBGYXN0IEV0aGVybmV0PiByZXYgMHgxMiBpbnQgYSBpcnEgMTEg b24gcGNpMC4xMy4wCmRlMDogU01DIDkzMzJEU1QgMjExNDAgWzEwLTEwME1iL3NdIHBhc3Mg MS4yCmRlMDogYWRkcmVzcyAwMDowMDpjMDo5NDo5ZTpkMApkZTA6IGVuYWJsaW5nIDEwYmFz ZVQgcG9ydAp2Z2EwOiA8UzMgVHJpbyBncmFwaGljcyBhY2NlbGVyYXRvcj4gcmV2IDB4NTMg aW50IGEgaXJxIDkgb24gcGNpMC4xNi4wClByb2JpbmcgZm9yIFBuUCBkZXZpY2VzOgpQcm9i aW5nIGZvciBkZXZpY2VzIG9uIHRoZSBJU0EgYnVzOgpzYzAgb24gaXNhCnNjMDogVkdBIG1v bm8gPDE2IHZpcnR1YWwgY29uc29sZXMsIGZsYWdzPTB4MD4KYXRrYmRjMCBhdCAweDYwLTB4 NmYgb24gbW90aGVyYm9hcmQKYXRrYmQwIGlycSAxIG9uIGlzYQpwc20wIG5vdCBmb3VuZApz aW8wIGF0IDB4M2Y4LTB4M2ZmIGlycSA0IGZsYWdzIDB4MTAgb24gaXNhCnNpbzA6IHR5cGUg MTY1NTBBCnNpbzEgYXQgMHgyZjgtMHgyZmYgaXJxIDMgb24gaXNhCnNpbzE6IHR5cGUgMTY1 NTBBCmZkYzAgYXQgMHgzZjAtMHgzZjcgaXJxIDYgZHJxIDIgb24gaXNhCmZkYzA6IEZJRk8g ZW5hYmxlZCwgOCBieXRlcyB0aHJlc2hvbGQKZmQwOiAxLjQ0TUIgMy41aW4Kd2RjMCBhdCAw eDFmMC0weDFmNyBpcnEgMTQgZmxhZ3MgMHhhMGZmYTBmZiBvbiBpc2EKd2RjMDogdW5pdCAw ICh3ZDApOiA8UVVBTlRVTSBGSVJFQkFMTDEwODBBPiwgRE1BLCAzMi1iaXQsIG11bHRpLWJs b2NrLTgKd2QwOiAxMDM5TUIgKDIxMjg4OTYgc2VjdG9ycyksIDIxMTIgY3lscywgMTYgaGVh ZHMsIDYzIFMvVCwgNTEyIEIvUwp3ZGMxIGF0IDB4MTcwLTB4MTc3IGlycSAxNSBmbGFncyAw eGEwZmZhMGZmIG9uIGlzYQp3ZGMxOiB1bml0IDAgKHdkMik6IDxGVUpJVFNVIE1QRTMwODRB RT4sIERNQSwgMzItYml0LCBtdWx0aS1ibG9jay0xNgp3ZDI6IDgwNjNNQiAoMTY1MTQwNjQg c2VjdG9ycyksIDE2MzgzIGN5bHMsIDE2IGhlYWRzLCA2MyBTL1QsIDUxMiBCL1MKcHBjMCBh dCAweDM3OCBpcnEgNyBmbGFncyAweDQwIG9uIGlzYQpwcGMwOiBHZW5lcmljIGNoaXBzZXQg KEVDUC9QUzIvTklCQkxFKSBpbiBDT01QQVRJQkxFIG1vZGUKcHBjMDogRklGTyB3aXRoIDE2 LzE2LzggYnl0ZXMgdGhyZXNob2xkCmxwdDA6IDxnZW5lcmljIHByaW50ZXI+IG9uIHBwYnVz IDAKbHB0MDogSW50ZXJydXB0LWRyaXZlbiBwb3J0CjEgM0M1eDkgYm9hcmQocykgb24gSVNB IGZvdW5kIGF0IDB4MzAwCmVwMCBhdCAweDMwMC0weDMwZiBpcnEgMTAgb24gaXNhCmVwMDog dXRwWypVVFAqXSBhZGRyZXNzIDAwOmMwOjRmOmQ1OjBhOjAyCnZnYTAgYXQgMHgzYjAtMHgz ZGYgbWFkZHIgMHhhMDAwMCBtc2l6ZSAxMzEwNzIgb24gaXNhCm5weDAgb24gbW90aGVyYm9h cmQKbnB4MDogSU5UIDE2IGludGVyZmFjZQpJbnRlbCBQZW50aXVtIGRldGVjdGVkLCBpbnN0 YWxsaW5nIHdvcmthcm91bmQgZm9yIEYwMEYgYnVnCmNoYW5naW5nIHJvb3QgZGV2aWNlIHRv IHdkMHMxYQpkZTA6IGVuYWJsaW5nIDEwMGJhc2VUWCBwb3J0CmRlMDogZW5hYmxpbmcgRnVs bCBEdXBsZXggMTAwYmFzZVRYIHBvcnQKZGUwOiBlbmFibGluZyAxMDBiYXNlVFggcG9ydApk ZTA6IGVuYWJsaW5nIEZ1bGwgRHVwbGV4IDEwMGJhc2VUWCBwb3J0CmRlMDogZW5hYmxpbmcg MTBiYXNlVCBwb3J0CmRlMDogZW5hYmxpbmcgRnVsbCBEdXBsZXggMTBiYXNlVCBwb3J0CmRl MDogZW5hYmxpbmcgMTBiYXNlVCBwb3J0CmRlMDogZW5hYmxpbmcgRnVsbCBEdXBsZXggMTBi YXNlVCBwb3J0CmRlMDogZW5hYmxpbmcgMTBiYXNlVCBwb3J0Cg== --------------6B8D3B0687B57F0605FD3FC2-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 5:14:53 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from hotmail.com (f262.pav1.hotmail.com [64.4.30.137]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D5E037B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 05:14:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsdforumen@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 05:14:49 -0800 Received: from 212.30.183.2 by pv1fd.pav1.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 13:14:49 GMT X-Originating-IP: [212.30.183.2] From: "Magdalinin Kirill" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: ipfw rules for incoming passive mode ftp connections Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 16:14:49 +0300 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Mar 2001 13:14:49.0844 (UTC) FILETIME=[407B3340:01C0AA2D] Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, I have FreeBSD (4.1 release) box with packet filtering enabled. The problem is that the current set of rules doesn't allow ftp passive mode connections. The ipfw rules are as follows: # Set quiet mode fwcmd="/sbin/ipfw -q" # Set network configuration ip="172.16.4.1" proxy1="172.16.4.2" # First clean up all the existing rules ${fwcmd} -f flush # Only in rare cases do you want to change these rules ${fwcmd} add 100 pass all from any to any via lo0 ${fwcmd} add 200 deny all from any to 127.0.0.0/8 # Allow TCP through if setup succeeded ${fwcmd} add pass tcp from any to any established # Allow IP fragments to path through ${fwcmd} add pass all from any to any frag # Allow access to our WWW ${fwcmd} add pass tcp from any to ${ip} http setup # Allow ICMP send/reply ${fwcmd} add pass icmp from any to ${ip} ${fwcmd} add pass icmp from ${ip} to any # Allow access to our FTP ${fwcmd} add pass tcp from any to ${ip} ftp setup # Allow access to our SSH ${fwcmd} add pass tcp from any to ${ip} ssh setup # Allow access to our SMTP ${fwcmd} add pass tcp from ${ip} smtp to any setup # Allow access to our Telnet from proxy-servers only ${fwcmd} add pass tcp from ${proxy1} to ${ip} telnet setup # Allow setup of outgoing TCP connections only ${fwcmd} add pass tcp from ${ip} to any setup # Disallow setup of all other TCP connections ${fwcmd} add deny tcp from any to any setup # Allow DNS queries out in the world ${fwcmd} add pass udp from any 53 to ${ip} ${fwcmd} add pass udp from ${ip} to any 53 "man ftpd" says: "... the server will use data ports in the range 49152..65535" for passive mode connections, and after running netstat I figured out that I have to alter ipfw rules in order to allow connections to that range of ports. Am I right? What is the best way to alter the current set of rules? Best regards, Kirill _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 5:39:47 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from level3.dynacom.net (level3.dynacom.net [206.107.213.213]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2919537B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 05:39:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kstewart@urx.com) Received: (qmail 3946 invoked by uid 0); 11 Mar 2001 13:39:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO urx.com) (206.159.132.160) by mail.urx.com with SMTP; 11 Mar 2001 13:39:40 -0000 Message-ID: <3AAB801C.D8038D3E@urx.com> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 05:39:40 -0800 From: Kent Stewart Reply-To: kstewart@urx.com Organization: Dynacom X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Magdalinin Kirill Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ipfw rules for incoming passive mode ftp connections References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Magdalinin Kirill wrote: > > Hello, > > I have FreeBSD (4.1 release) box with packet filtering enabled. > The problem is that the current set of rules doesn't allow ftp > passive mode connections. The ipfw rules are as follows: > > # Set quiet mode > fwcmd="/sbin/ipfw -q" > > # Set network configuration > ip="172.16.4.1" > proxy1="172.16.4.2" > > # First clean up all the existing rules > ${fwcmd} -f flush > > # Only in rare cases do you want to change these rules > ${fwcmd} add 100 pass all from any to any via lo0 > ${fwcmd} add 200 deny all from any to 127.0.0.0/8 > > # Allow TCP through if setup succeeded > ${fwcmd} add pass tcp from any to any established > > # Allow IP fragments to path through > ${fwcmd} add pass all from any to any frag > > # Allow access to our WWW > ${fwcmd} add pass tcp from any to ${ip} http setup > > # Allow ICMP send/reply > ${fwcmd} add pass icmp from any to ${ip} > ${fwcmd} add pass icmp from ${ip} to any > > # Allow access to our FTP > ${fwcmd} add pass tcp from any to ${ip} ftp setup > > # Allow access to our SSH > ${fwcmd} add pass tcp from any to ${ip} ssh setup > > # Allow access to our SMTP > ${fwcmd} add pass tcp from ${ip} smtp to any setup > > # Allow access to our Telnet from proxy-servers only > ${fwcmd} add pass tcp from ${proxy1} to ${ip} telnet setup > > # Allow setup of outgoing TCP connections only > ${fwcmd} add pass tcp from ${ip} to any setup > > # Disallow setup of all other TCP connections > ${fwcmd} add deny tcp from any to any setup > > # Allow DNS queries out in the world > ${fwcmd} add pass udp from any 53 to ${ip} > ${fwcmd} add pass udp from ${ip} to any 53 > > "man ftpd" says: "... the server will use data ports in the range > 49152..65535" for passive mode connections, and after running > netstat I figured out that I have to alter ipfw rules in order > to allow connections to that range of ports. Am I right? I can show you what I just got to accept passive. I am seeing ports in the range you reported from a man for ftpd. What I added was # FTP - Allow incoming data channel for outgoing connections, ${fwcmd} add pass log tcp from any 20 to any 1024-65535 setup ${fwcmd} add pass log tcp from any 1024-65535 to any 21 setup ${fwcmd} add pass log tcp from any 1024-65535 to any 1024-65535 setup It works in both normal and passive mode. I can probably trim the range but haven't yet. It is remote and when I mess up, cleaning up is fun. In the past, I at to schedule a shell script that cleaned ipfw and reset it to open. Kent > > What is the best way to alter the current set of rules? > > Best regards, > Kirill > _________________________________________________________________________ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA mailto:kbstew99@hotmail.com http://kstewart.urx.com/kstewart/index.html FreeBSD News http://daily.daemonnews.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 7:27:24 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from imo-m01.mx.aol.com (imo-m01.mx.aol.com [64.12.136.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60DA737B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 07:27:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from JBOGGEY1@aol.com) Received: from JBOGGEY1@aol.com by imo-m01.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v29.5.) id n.a.9fb3037 (26121) for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 10:27:15 -0500 (EST) From: JBOGGEY1@aol.com Message-ID: Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 10:27:15 EST Subject: Acroread To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 128 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I am trying to delete files from my hard drive and I keep getting windows asking which reader do you wish to use to look at this docuement. How do I know the format of these documents? How do I download acroread? Who is the creator of this software? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 7:41:29 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mostgraveconcern.com (mostgraveconcern.com [216.82.145.240]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3531237B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 07:41:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dan@mostgraveconcern.com) Received: from danco (danco.mostgraveconcern.com [10.20.155.2]) by mostgraveconcern.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f2BFfN263461; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 07:41:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dan@mostgraveconcern.com) Message-ID: <020901c0aa41$b72f4b20$029b140a@danco> Reply-To: "Dan O'Connor" From: "Dan O'Connor" To: , Subject: Re: Acroread Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 07:41:18 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3155.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >I am trying to delete files from my hard drive and I keep getting windows >asking which reader do you wish to use to look at this docuement. How do I >know the format of these documents? How do I download acroread? Who is the >creator of this software? Well...this is a FreeBSD mailing list. We have nothing to do with Windows software (other than offering a better alternative). But, if I remember correctly, you don't actually need a *viewer* to delete files. You just highlight it in Explorer and press Delete. If you're looking for Acrobat Reader, try the Adobe web site (http://www.adobe.com/). --Dan -- Dan O'Connor On Matters of Most Grave Concern http://www.mostgraveconcern.com FreeBSD Cheat Sheets http://www.mostgraveconcern.com/freebsd/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 7:45: 7 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from pc89225.stofanet.dk (pc89225.stofanet.dk [212.10.22.225]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 02A3437B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 07:45:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from morten@hotpost.dk) Received: (qmail 26245 invoked by uid 1000); 11 Mar 2001 15:45:11 -0000 From: morten@hotpost.dk Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 16:45:11 +0100 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: init.d and rc directories Message-ID: <20010311164510.A4048@hotpost.dk> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20010311030715.C3147@hotpost.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010311030715.C3147@hotpost.dk>; from morten@hotpost.dk on Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 03:07:15AM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 11, Mar, 2001 at 03:07:15AM +0100, morten@hotpost.dk wrote: > On 10, Mar, 2001 at 06:06:10PM -0500, G. Jason Middleton wrote: > > well ladies and gentlemen i am installing qmail and following the > > directions on qmail.orgs home page "life with Qmail" > > > > I have it installed and i am at the point where i need to create a startup > > script and it says to install it into my "init.d" directory. However i > > have no init.d directory! After that it also wants me to create links > > using ln to my rc directories...but i cannot find them either! I have > > looked all over..../etc/ etc etc. > > You're confused by Linux'isms ;-) > > Try to get this: > > http://pc89225.stofanet.dk/qmail-install.tar.gz OK, I've made a mistake and the file was there but not publicly accessible, it is fixed now, sorry for the inconvenience. Morten To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 8: 0:44 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from femail3.rdc1.on.home.com (femail3.rdc1.on.home.com [24.2.9.90]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E14F37B719 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 08:00:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from latif2221@home.com) Received: from home.com ([24.114.36.13]) by femail3.rdc1.on.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with ESMTP id <20010311160006.VTYJ6398.femail3.rdc1.on.home.com@home.com>; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 08:00:06 -0800 Message-ID: <3AAB9D57.F88A4224@home.com> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 10:44:23 -0500 From: Duraid X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ted Mittelstaedt Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: apache is not running no way (please help) References: <002e01c0a9e4$f9d69080$1401a8c0@tedm.placo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG it worked... thanks Duraid Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > Make sure that any logs defined in the config file point to > directories that actually exist. Apache will not create > logfile subdirectories when it starts, and if it can't > write to access and error it will not start. > > Ted Mittelstaedt tedm@toybox.placo.com > Author of: The FreeBSD Corporate Networker's Guide > Book website: http://www.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Duraid > >Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2001 3:36 PM > >To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > >Subject: Re: apache is not running no way (please help) > > > > > >it's really not running.. i even tried the apache13-fp port .. the exact > >same problem.. please help. > > > >Duraid > > > >Duraid wrote: > > > >> on freebsd 4.2 stable installed /usr/ports/www/apache13 .. two times > >> here is what's happening > >> root# apachectl start > >> Segmentation fault - core dumped > >> /usr/local/sbin/apachectl start: httpd could not be started > >> root# httpd > >> Segmentation fault (core dumped) > >> > >> also > >> > >> root# httpd -V > >> Server version: Apache/1.3.19 (Unix) > >> Server built: Mar 10 2001 09:10:57 > >> Server's Module Magic Number: 19990320:10 > >> Server compiled with.... > >> -D HAVE_MMAP > >> -D USE_MMAP_SCOREBOARD > >> -D USE_MMAP_FILES > >> -D USE_FLOCK_SERIALIZED_ACCEPT > >> -D SINGLE_LISTEN_UNSERIALIZED_ACCEPT > >> -D HTTPD_ROOT="/usr/local" > >> -D SUEXEC_BIN="/usr/local/sbin/suexec" > >> -D DEFAULT_PIDLOG="/var/run/httpd.pid" > >> -D DEFAULT_SCOREBOARD="/var/run/httpd.scoreboard" > >> -D DEFAULT_LOCKFILE="/var/run/httpd.lock" > >> -D DEFAULT_XFERLOG="/var/log/httpd-access.log" > >> -D DEFAULT_ERRORLOG="/var/log/httpd-error.log" > >> -D TYPES_CONFIG_FILE="etc/apache/mime.types" > >> -D SERVER_CONFIG_FILE="etc/apache/httpd.conf" > >> -D ACCESS_CONFIG_FILE="etc/apache/access.conf" > >> -D RESOURCE_CONFIG_FILE="etc/apache/srm.conf" > >> > >> did it happen to anybody else??? > >> > >> Duraid > >> > >> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > >> with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > > > > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > >with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 8: 0:48 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from bov.nu (bovnet.demon.co.uk [158.152.198.41]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3007537B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 08:00:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from steve@bov.nu) Received: from steve [192.168.0.4] by bov.nu [192.168.0.2] with SMTP (MDaemon.v3.5.3.R) for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 15:52:03 +0000 Message-ID: <011d01c0aa46$ba09a200$0400a8c0@bov.nu> Reply-To: "steve" From: "steve" To: Subject: boot disk Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 16:17:09 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_011A_01C0AA46.B9495F40" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.4 X-Return-Path: steve@bov.nu X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_011A_01C0AA46.B9495F40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, The FAQ states that 1,474,560 bytes will fit on a floppy. confused?????? A floppy is only 1,457,664 bytes. Fdimage reports files too big Help! Steve. ------=_NextPart_000_011A_01C0AA46.B9495F40 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
 
The FAQ states that 1,474,560 bytes = will fit on a=20 floppy.
 
confused??????
 
A floppy is only 1,457,664 = bytes.
 
Fdimage reports files too = big
 
Help!
 
Steve.
------=_NextPart_000_011A_01C0AA46.B9495F40-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 8:12: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from femail3.rdc1.on.home.com (femail3.rdc1.on.home.com [24.2.9.90]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F7D537B719 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 08:12:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from latif2221@home.com) Received: from home.com ([24.114.36.13]) by femail3.rdc1.on.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with ESMTP id <20010311161132.WAOS6398.femail3.rdc1.on.home.com@home.com> for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 08:11:32 -0800 Message-ID: <3AABA004.35366726@home.com> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 10:55:49 -0500 From: Duraid X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: rplayd is running??? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG why do i have rplayd running? do i need it? Duraid To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 8:18:38 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from femail3.rdc1.on.home.com (femail3.rdc1.on.home.com [24.2.9.90]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E319237B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 08:18:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from latif2221@home.com) Received: from home.com ([24.114.36.13]) by femail3.rdc1.on.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with ESMTP id <20010311161803.WELF6398.femail3.rdc1.on.home.com@home.com>; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 08:18:03 -0800 Message-ID: <3AABA18C.8B3ADBB4@home.com> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 11:02:20 -0500 From: Duraid X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG" , "ipfilter@coombs.anu.edu.au" Subject: how to reinstall ipf? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG running freebsd 4.2 stable... how can i uninstall ipf and then install i again. Duraid To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 8:33:30 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from bryden.apana.org.au (bryden.apana.org.au [203.3.126.129]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CB5B37B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 08:33:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dougy@bryden.apana.org.au) Received: from roadrunner (roadrunner [192.168.0.2]) by bryden.apana.org.au (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f2BGWxi23744; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 02:33:01 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from dougy@bryden.apana.org.au) Message-ID: <020601c0aa49$16b3f1c0$0200a8c0@apana.org.au> From: "Doug Young" To: "Arisandy" Cc: References: <004601c0a881$cfbf9260$fc21600a@sandy> Subject: Re: /etc/gettytab "pp" not responding?? Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 02:33:59 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I've been using that for a while & don't have much trouble with it ... can only think of three areas that have caused me much aggro. Is your ppplogin file world executable ?? What O/S are you trying to login with ?? ... Windows won't connect automatically with the regular getty, you must either "bring up a terminal window after dialling" or write a login script. Are both ends using public range IPs or is NAT involved ?? I've rarely had problems with public range IPs but almost always had trouble using NAT over a dialup link, particularly when there are two or more dialup links in series. > I tried to build ppp server using FreeBSD-4.2, > already done with /etc/gettytab, /etc/ttys, /etc/ppp/ppp.conf > etc...(following man ppp) > but now my ppp server cant run? seem my /usr/local/bin/ppplogin didn't run? > I already follow 2 methods receiving incomng call (man ppp) but still > same... > always get disconected...and there is nothing happeng in /var/log/messages > nor /var/log/ppp.log? > > so what happens?? > > > thanks > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 8:35:33 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from femail2.rdc1.on.home.com (femail2.rdc1.on.home.com [24.2.9.89]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CEF637B719 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 08:35:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from latif2221@home.com) Received: from home.com ([24.114.36.13]) by femail2.rdc1.on.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with ESMTP id <20010311163523.SVIA606.femail2.rdc1.on.home.com@home.com> for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 08:35:23 -0800 Message-ID: <3AABA583.30ECACE@home.com> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 11:19:15 -0500 From: Duraid X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: ssh error Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG every time i remotly login to my sshd i get a message saying that the server id has changed and maybe that someone is evesdroping. is that some thing to do with my public id? but when ssh from the local machine where the server is everything is ok. duraid To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 8:40:54 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from hotmail.com (oe40.law14.hotmail.com [64.4.20.97]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4572C37B73C for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 08:40:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andreyvescloutier@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 08:40:47 -0800 X-Originating-IP: [24.200.211.12] From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9-yves_Cloutier?= To: Subject: Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 11:41:28 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0007_01C0AA20.358A37E0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Mar 2001 16:40:47.0423 (UTC) FILETIME=[062C1CF0:01C0AA4A] Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG C'est un message de format MIME en plusieurs parties. ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C0AA20.358A37E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable i would like help me to know lauche the graphical interface please help = me with the shell. ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C0AA20.358A37E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
i would like help me to know lauche the = graphical=20 interface please help me with the shell.
------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C0AA20.358A37E0-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 8:51:22 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from emf.net (emf.emf.net [205.149.0.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0138737B719 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 08:51:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from toriud@emf.net) Received: (from toriud@localhost) by emf.net (K/K) id IAA24786; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 08:51:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 08:51:13 -0800 (PST) From: Daisuke Toriumi To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: ppp not working Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I tried command `ppp` to /dev/cuaa0, /dev/cuaa1 to see if it is working, but I got message `Bad file description`. I don't think my modem was correctly probed. Is there anyway to probe the device manually? Also I would like to know which device is probed or not. I would appreciate if you can tell me the command to see probed devices. Daisuke Toriumi (toriud@emf.net) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 8:54:10 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from relay.ioffe.rssi.ru (relay.ioffe.rssi.ru [194.85.224.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB9E837B718; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 08:54:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kopts@astro.ioffe.rssi.ru) Received: from astro.ioffe.rssi.ru (astro.ioffe.rssi.ru [194.85.229.130]) by relay.ioffe.rssi.ru (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA02570; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 19:53:54 +0300 (MSK) Received: by astro.ioffe.rssi.ru (8.9.3/Clnt-2.14-AS-eef) id TAA13194; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 19:53:49 +0300 (MSK) Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 19:53:49 +0300 (MSK) From: Alexey Koptsevich To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: bad144 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello Poul-Henning, May I ask what was the reason for removing bad144 from 4.x? It seems to me it was quite useful utility in many cases. E.g., I temporarily move data from failed drive to another one and I want to know immediately are there bad blocks on the replacement drive or not. Why should I rely upon capability of modern drives to remap bad blocks? Or should I store 3.x somewhere just for this purpose? Is it possible to get bad144 back? Yours, Alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 8:55:34 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from relay.ioffe.rssi.ru (relay.ioffe.rssi.ru [194.85.224.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05DB237B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 08:55:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kopts@astro.ioffe.rssi.ru) Received: from astro.ioffe.rssi.ru (astro.ioffe.rssi.ru [194.85.229.130]) by relay.ioffe.rssi.ru (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA02620 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 19:55:21 +0300 (MSK) Received: by astro.ioffe.rssi.ru (8.9.3/Clnt-2.14-AS-eef) id TAA13200; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 19:55:21 +0300 (MSK) Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 19:55:21 +0300 (MSK) From: Alexey Koptsevich To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: SMART Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, Is there a FreeBSD (or Linux) program to check SMART on hard drives? Please cc: me your reply. Thanks, Alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 9: 6:29 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from bryden.apana.org.au (bryden.apana.org.au [203.3.126.129]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D96337B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 09:06:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dougy@bryden.apana.org.au) Received: from roadrunner (roadrunner [192.168.0.2]) by bryden.apana.org.au (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f2BH5Si23901; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 03:05:34 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from dougy@bryden.apana.org.au) Message-ID: <022501c0aa4d$a96a65e0$0200a8c0@apana.org.au> From: "Doug Young" To: "Michael Conlen" , "Matthew Rudderham" , References: Subject: Re: What Are Standard Procedures For System Backup Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 03:05:27 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In order to "dump" EVERYTHING on a hard drive to a file, what command needs to be used ?? I looked at "man dump" & the handbook section on backup but neither provides much help ... nothing of consequence in the mailing list archives either. > You can dump with the -f filename option to dump to a file, then copy to the > windows machine using the file transfer method of choice and burn to CD. > > -- > Groove On Dude > Michael Conlen > Obfuscated Networking > meconlen@obfuscated.net > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Matthew > > Rudderham > > Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2001 10:53 PM > > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Subject: What Are Standard Procedures For System Backup > > > > > > Hi, > > I currently administer my FreeBSD 4.0-Release box mostly via SSH since the > > monitor died. I was recently looking into doing a CVSup of my sources and > > it of course recommended a full backup. Up until now, I'm not proud to > > say I've never completed one. What are the standard procedures for > > backing up a FreeBSD System? > > I have read the handbook sections, however they seem to only > > adress tape backup methods, which unfortunately isn't useful to me. I have > > a Win machine on my network with a cd burner, and this would be my > > preferred method, or a tarball that could be stored on another > > machine on the network would also be an option that I could add to > > my cron I suppose? Thanks for the help. > > > > - Matt Rudderham > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 9:17:35 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from sylgen.deep-ocean.net (nas-cbv-4-24-22.dial.proxad.net [213.228.24.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FAC237B719 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 09:17:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from olive@deep-ocean.net) Received: by sylgen.deep-ocean.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 355211FFC; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 18:14:07 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 18:14:07 +0100 From: Olivier Cortes To: Francois Kritzinger Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: QUESTION REGARDING PPP Message-ID: <20010311181407.A5321@sylgen.deep-ocean.net> Mail-Followup-To: Olivier Cortes , Francois Kritzinger , questions@freebsd.org References: <000b01c0a961$d91619c0$75b31ec4@ffkrz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <000b01c0a961$d91619c0$75b31ec4@ffkrz>; from ffkrz@iafrica.com on Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 02:58:07PM +0200 Organization: Deep-Ocean Network X-URL: http://www.deep-ocean.net/ Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 02:58:07PM +0200, Francois Kritzinger wrote: > Hi > > I have a problem with my PPP configuration. > I have spent MANY hours reading help documents (including the freeBSD Handbook) trying to sort this problem out, and I've given up, so please forgive me if you think this is a trivial matter. > > My Setup: > a.. freeBSD 4.2 STABLE, > b.. US Robotics 56K external modem on com2 (or cuaa1 or whatever), > c.. an ISP account, > d.. 2 x ISP DNS server IP addresses, > e.. a dynamically allocated IP address > f.. not much patience :) > The Situation: > > I can get my Internet connection working in a hacky kind of way, IOW I can browse the internet and even send email in pine using the included configuration files. BUT there are certain problems. > > PROBLEMS: > > If I type # ppp and then # dial MYISP, ppp connects to my ISP. BUT if I then type # netscape &, netscape does not actually start up (in KDE) or it does not create a window. According to #jobs it is running though. I can also not start pine in this situation. > > To work around this I would then start up KDE, type # netscape & in a terminal, and then # ppp and #dial xxx and this would work fine, except for one thing: in the terminal I would get messages like this: > > "sio0: 2 more silo overflows" or something like that. > > In my desperation I have tweaked these files a lot, so what I have sent you may not be the most successful configuration I have had, and I also ran a shell script I got off the Internet (also included). > After running this script sendmail produces an error message at boot time like: "hostx not known, sleeping for retry" or something similar (I am in Windows now so please forgive me again). Sendmail also dials in (runs ppp) at boot time, even though I do not have an /etc/start_if.tun0 file. > > So my QUESTIONS are: > > a.. How do I get rid of the "silo overflow" messages? i don't know for that, my USR is working perfectly good. > b.. What is the correct way to use ppp from the command line? i type "ppp -nat -background myprovider", myprovider: beiing a label in ppp.conf if the connexion goes ok, ppp fork into the background. when i want to stop the connexion, i do "killall ppp" or wait for the timeout. > c.. How can I get sendmail to NOT check for email at boot time? try to see if you have the flags "-q30m" somewhere, and scratch them. you must run sendmail with '-bd' only, and when you run ppp spawn something who runs the mailqueue. see man ppp, it says something like: in ppp.conf: !sendmail -q10m see ya --- Olivier Cortes free software admin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 9:18:17 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [206.29.169.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3343537B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 09:18:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedm.placo.com (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [206.29.168.154]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f2BHI9N12593; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 09:18:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "steve" , Subject: RE: boot disk Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 09:18:09 -0800 Message-ID: <005001c0aa4f$3ec7e580$1401a8c0@tedm.placo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 In-Reply-To: <011d01c0aa46$ba09a200$0400a8c0@bov.nu> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG try rawrite.exe then. Ted Mittelstaedt tedm@toybox.placo.com Author of: The FreeBSD Corporate Networker's Guide Book website: http://www.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of steve Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2001 8:17 AM To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: boot disk Hi, The FAQ states that 1,474,560 bytes will fit on a floppy. confused?????? A floppy is only 1,457,664 bytes. Fdimage reports files too big Help! Steve. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 9:25:34 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from matt.MUNICH.v-net.org (u57n248.syd.eastlink.ca [24.222.57.248]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E8D537B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 09:25:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from matt@cape-breton-island.com) Received: from localhost (matt@localhost) by matt.MUNICH.v-net.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA28186 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 13:25:30 -0400 (AST) (envelope-from matt@cape-breton-island.com) Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 13:25:29 -0400 (AST) From: Matthew Rudderham X-Sender: matt@matt.MUNICH.v-net.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Upgrading Apache Via Package Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, I'm going to upgrade my apache. I'm still learning BSD, If I download the package, and use pkg_add will all of my old configurations still remain and work smoothly? I am going from 1.3.12 to 1.3.19 Thanks To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 9:26:46 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mailout01.sul.t-online.com (mailout01.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.80]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DAC537B719 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 09:26:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Ulf.Kister@t-online.de) Received: from fwd01.sul.t-online.com by mailout01.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 14c9c9-0000Hg-02; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 18:26:41 +0100 Received: from harry.my.net (320020256018-0001@[62.155.144.140]) by fwd01.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 14c9br-08iL6OC; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 18:26:23 +0100 Received: (from kister@localhost) by harry.my.net (8.11.3/8.11.1) id f2BHQCw05296; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 18:26:12 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from kister) To: Larry Rosenman Subject: Re: StarOffice 5.2 on STABLE 4.2 References: <87u25loa0a.fsf@harry.my.net> <20010223140303.A15874@lerami.lerctr.org> Organization: underground enterprise Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG From: Ulf.Kister@t-online.de (Ulf Kister) Date: 11 Mar 2001 18:26:11 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20010223140303.A15874@lerami.lerctr.org> Message-ID: <87u250i5e4.fsf@harry.my.net> Lines: 33 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Sender: 320020256018-0001@t-dialin.net Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, If anybody cares: The problem ceased to exist for me. It did not cease all by itself, but during the last two days I did (besides other things :-) 1 Install FreeBSD 4.2 STABLE from scratch 2 Upgrade to 4.3 BETA (cvsupped on 8.3.01) 3 Install StarOffice52 (which obviously was updated too - at least a 30 MB patch was downloaded which was not already present on my distfiles) Now any of these steps could have been the point, but I' quite sure I can exclude (1) - I reused my complete /etc directory, and the setup was OK (everything else worked fine). Larry Rosenman writes: > * Ulf Kister [010223 06:32]: > > Hi there, > > > > recently I installed Staroffice 5.2 on my FreeBSD 4.2 STABLE box and > > it does a fine job, except that any features using the network seem > > not to work. > > > > [...] > > > > Thanks in advance, Ulf > > We've seen these problems for months now. Is there any hope of them > being fixed? > > LER To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 9:46:32 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from hotmail.com (f245.law11.hotmail.com [64.4.17.245]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C825437B719 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 09:46:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from burnscharlesn@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 09:46:23 -0800 Received: from 24.21.122.151 by lw11fd.law11.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 17:46:23 GMT X-Originating-IP: [24.21.122.151] From: "Charles Burns" To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: No man pages for root Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 10:46:23 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Mar 2001 17:46:23.0624 (UTC) FILETIME=[3054B880:01C0AA53] Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello FreeBSD people, For no apparent reason, root can no longer use man pages on my FreeBSD machine. Normal users, however, can use man pages just fine. Whenever any man command is given in root, root gets the message "No manual entry for foo." The last thing that I did was modify some of the files in /usr/share/skel, but I fail to see what that has to do with anything. I may have unwittingly done something else that I cannot remember, though. Note that "manpath" returns the exact same value for both root and normal users, which is the default manpath. Does anybody have any ideas as to how this might be remedied? Many thanks, Charles Burns _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 9:51: 8 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from smtp-server1.tampabay.rr.com (smtp-server1.tampabay.rr.com [65.32.1.34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4A9237B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 09:51:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from meconlen@obfuscated.net) Received: from clarity (24129168hfc216.tampabay.rr.com [24.129.168.216]) by smtp-server1.tampabay.rr.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with SMTP id f2BGLs024553; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 11:21:54 -0500 (EST) From: "Michael Conlen" To: "Forrest" , "FreeBSD Questions" Subject: RE: Why during boot does sendmail take so long? Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 11:16:21 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 In-reply-to: Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I would say that DNS would be it. Sendmail is usually pretty quick. Does it know it's hostname, or is the hostname it thinks it is in DNS? If not you can probably speed things up by putting it in the /etc/hosts file. Sendmail should not take three minutes to start up. -- Groove On Dude Michael Conlen Obfuscated Networking meconlen@obfuscated.net > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Forrest > Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2001 1:57 AM > To: FreeBSD Questions > Subject: Why during boot does sendmail take so long? > > > Hi all, > Is the reason that sendamil takes so long on bootup because of DNS issues > > Starting standard daemons: sendmail [waits 3 minutes] > > Could I get faster bootup with a different mail server? > > -- Forrest > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 9:51:12 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from femail13.sdc1.sfba.home.com (femail13.sdc1.sfba.home.com [24.0.95.140]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50A1E37B71A for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 09:51:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from europax@home.com) Received: from home.com ([24.12.186.185]) by femail13.sdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with ESMTP id <20010311175106.EXPX4561.femail13.sdc1.sfba.home.com@home.com>; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 09:51:06 -0800 Message-ID: <3AABBB16.184CB08E@home.com> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 09:51:18 -0800 From: Rob X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9=2Dyves?= Cloutier Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > AndrИ-yves Cloutier wrote: > > i would like help me to know lauche the graphical interface please > help me with the shell. Please refer to the FreeBSD Handbook available on the www.freebsd.org website. But in summary: 1. Run either xf86config or XF86Setup to configure X for your video card 2. Create an .xinitrc file, whose last line calls the window manager you want to use, e.g KDE, Gnome, etc. I use Windowmaker. Install one of these from the ports 3. Install the xwrappers port so you can run X without having the server SETUID. 4. Type startx. Note kernel security level cannot be set too high, or X will not run. See the handbook or man pages for better explanations. Good luck. Rob. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 9:58: 0 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from akira.lanfear.com (akira.lanfear.com [208.12.11.174]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD24737B719 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 09:57:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mwlist@lanfear.com) Received: from sapporo.lanfear.com (h-64-105-36-216.snvacaid.covad.net [64.105.36.216]) by akira.lanfear.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA81862; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 09:57:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mwlist@lanfear.com) Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 09:57:54 -0800 (PST) From: Marc W Message-Id: <200103111757.JAA81862@akira.lanfear.com> To: Duraid , "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: Re:ssh error MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Mailer: Kiltdown 0.7 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Please do not take these errors lightly -- the one 'hole' in SSH is just that -- if somebody inserts him/herself in between you and your server, gives you new keys, and you don't get suspicious when you keep having to accept new keys, the whole system breaks down. i'm not sure what you're saying here: what case exactly is failing? where are you "remotely login to your ssh" from ?? marc. Marc W, San Francisco, CA Kiltdown -- a free email client for X www.kiltdown.org -- it's what's underneath that counts. > ----------------------------- > From: Duraid > To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG" > Subject: ssh error > Sent: 03/11/01 11:19> > > > every time i remotly login to my sshd i get a message saying that the > server id has changed and maybe that someone is evesdroping. is that > some thing to do with my public id? but when ssh from the local machine > where the server is everything is ok. > > duraid > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 9:58: 2 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from akira.lanfear.com (akira.lanfear.com [208.12.11.174]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E76B37B71A for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 09:57:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mwlist@lanfear.com) Received: from sapporo.lanfear.com (h-64-105-36-216.snvacaid.covad.net [64.105.36.216]) by akira.lanfear.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA81866; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 09:57:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mwlist@lanfear.com) Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 09:57:55 -0800 (PST) From: Marc W Message-Id: <200103111757.JAA81866@akira.lanfear.com> To: Forrest , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re:Why during boot does sendmail take so long? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Mailer: Kiltdown 0.7 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is a DNS issue. Either your DNS server is down, your DNS info is incorrectly set, or it can't get your hostname from your IP address. This is stuff that really *should* be fixed if you really are running sendmail, or you should just turn off sendmail (add "sendmail_enable="NO" to /etc/rc.conf) marc. Marc W, San Francisco, CA Kiltdown -- a free email client for X www.kiltdown.org -- it's what's underneath that counts. > ----------------------------- > From: Forrest > To: FreeBSD Questions > Subject: Why during boot does sendmail take so long? > Sent: 03/10/01 22:56> > > > Hi all, > Is the reason that sendamil takes so long on bootup because of DNS issues > > Starting standard daemons: sendmail [waits 3 minutes] > > Could I get faster bootup with a different mail server? > > -- Forrest > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 10: 1:48 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from hotmail.com (f102.law11.hotmail.com [64.4.17.102]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E76D537B71A for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 10:01:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from burnscharlesn@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 10:01:46 -0800 Received: from 24.21.122.151 by lw11fd.law11.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 18:01:45 GMT X-Originating-IP: [24.21.122.151] From: "Charles Burns" To: joel.carnat@noos.fr, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PING filtering Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 11:01:45 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Mar 2001 18:01:46.0110 (UTC) FILETIME=[562CE9E0:01C0AA55] Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Setup ipfw (see handbook) Then add the line: /sbin/ipfw add 1 deny log icmp from any to any in icmptypes 0 To any startup script or just type it in yourself. That should work (I didn't test it). If it doesn't, the ipfw manpage should help. ICMP type 1 is an echo reply, FYI. You shouldn't try to defeat the upload ratio of legit FTP servers. Charles Burns >From: Joel CARNAT >To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG >Subject: PING filtering >Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2001 19:16:44 +0100 > >hello ! > >I noticed that som POP3 server didn't reply to PINGs... >1- How can I make my machine don't reply to PING so that my upload ratio >(I'm using cable connection) won't explose ? >2- Can I syslog PING request from other machines ? > >thX for answer :) > > >Joel CARNAT : >============= >FreeBSD: The Power To Server ! > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 10: 8:14 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from hotmail.com (f168.law11.hotmail.com [64.4.17.168]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEAF137B71A for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 10:08:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from burnscharlesn@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 10:08:10 -0800 Received: from 24.21.122.151 by lw11fd.law11.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 18:08:09 GMT X-Originating-IP: [24.21.122.151] From: "Charles Burns" To: bsdforumen@hotmail.com, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw rules for incoming passive mode ftp connections Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 11:08:09 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Mar 2001 18:08:10.0147 (UTC) FILETIME=[3B144F30:01C0AA56] Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This was somewhat covered a few days ago. Mike Meyer pointed out that the documentation for ftpd is incorrect. If you allow ports 1024-4999 (the "old behavior") PASV FTP should work. Sortof. It seems rather flaky to me with a firewall enabled, actually, but I probably just need to refine my rules. It was suggested that the option -DIP_PORTRANGE was needed to enable the behavior that is supposed to be default. This may work for you, but did not work for me for some reason. When I tried defining this option in the source code, GCC complained that it was already defined in a file that is completely external to FTPD (but is included). Try those two suggestions, and if you find out anything more about this issue please let me know. Charles Burns >From: "Magdalinin Kirill" >To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org >Subject: ipfw rules for incoming passive mode ftp connections >Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 16:14:49 +0300 > >Hello, > >I have FreeBSD (4.1 release) box with packet filtering enabled. >The problem is that the current set of rules doesn't allow ftp >passive mode connections. The ipfw rules are as follows: > ># Set quiet mode >fwcmd="/sbin/ipfw -q" > ># Set network configuration >ip="172.16.4.1" >proxy1="172.16.4.2" > ># First clean up all the existing rules >${fwcmd} -f flush > ># Only in rare cases do you want to change these rules >${fwcmd} add 100 pass all from any to any via lo0 >${fwcmd} add 200 deny all from any to 127.0.0.0/8 > ># Allow TCP through if setup succeeded >${fwcmd} add pass tcp from any to any established > ># Allow IP fragments to path through >${fwcmd} add pass all from any to any frag > ># Allow access to our WWW >${fwcmd} add pass tcp from any to ${ip} http setup > ># Allow ICMP send/reply >${fwcmd} add pass icmp from any to ${ip} >${fwcmd} add pass icmp from ${ip} to any > ># Allow access to our FTP >${fwcmd} add pass tcp from any to ${ip} ftp setup > ># Allow access to our SSH >${fwcmd} add pass tcp from any to ${ip} ssh setup > ># Allow access to our SMTP >${fwcmd} add pass tcp from ${ip} smtp to any setup > ># Allow access to our Telnet from proxy-servers only >${fwcmd} add pass tcp from ${proxy1} to ${ip} telnet setup > ># Allow setup of outgoing TCP connections only >${fwcmd} add pass tcp from ${ip} to any setup > ># Disallow setup of all other TCP connections >${fwcmd} add deny tcp from any to any setup > ># Allow DNS queries out in the world >${fwcmd} add pass udp from any 53 to ${ip} >${fwcmd} add pass udp from ${ip} to any 53 > > >"man ftpd" says: "... the server will use data ports in the range >49152..65535" for passive mode connections, and after running >netstat I figured out that I have to alter ipfw rules in order >to allow connections to that range of ports. Am I right? > >What is the best way to alter the current set of rules? > >Best regards, >Kirill >_________________________________________________________________________ >Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 10:19:21 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from brimstone.global.net.uk (brimstone.global.net.uk [194.126.80.70]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B011C37B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 10:18:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from simond@irrelevant.org) Received: from not.irrelevant.org ([194.126.88.251] helo=SIDLAPTOP) by brimstone.global.net.uk with smtp (Exim 3.02 #3) id 14cAPk-0007dS-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 18:17:57 +0000 Message-ID: <002801c0aa57$b0c808b0$fb587ec2@SIDLAPTOP> From: "Simon Dick" To: Subject: Problem with ATA code detecting drive size Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 18:17:37 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Since sometime in 4.1-STABLE I've been having problems getting FreeBSD working with my 20gb IBM HD, I've enclosed output from an old boot -v from when it worked and a more recent boot -v from 4.2-STABLE (I get the same result when trying with the latest 4.3-BETA so it's not been fixed yet. For some reason unknown to me this problem first started when I removed the primary slave drive (which was only ATA33 capable) and put a new cable in to enable ATA66 on the drive, from then on FreeBSD has seen the drive as a 2gb drive despite me even trying replacing the old cable, FreeBSD still seemed to be setting the drive to ATA66 despite the old ATA33 only cable. Since Win98SE still works fine with the correct setting (and the bios even says ATA33 with the old cable) I'm guessing that it's something in the IDE code but having no time to look at the problem yet I may well have to install NetBSD or OpenBSD just to get a working "proper" OS installed :( Here's the old boot -v output: Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: Copyright (c) 1992-2000 The FreeBSD Project. Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE #0: Wed Sep 6 15:08:28 BST 2000 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: root@adsl.irrelevant.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SIMOND Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: Calibrating clock(s) ... TSC clock: 655808681 Hz, i8254 clock: 1193124 Hz Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: CLK_USE_I8254_CALIBRATION not specified - using default frequency Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: CLK_USE_TSC_CALIBRATION not specified - using old calibration method Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) Processor (655.85-MHz 686-class CPU) Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x630 Stepping = 0 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: Features=0x183f9ff Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: AMD Features=0xc0440000<,AMIE,DSP,3DNow!> Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: Data TLB: 24 entries, fully associative Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: Instruction TLB: 16 entries, fully associative Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: L1 data cache: 64 kbytes, 64 bytes/line, 1 lines/tag, 2-way associative Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: L1 instruction cache: 64 kbytes, 64 bytes/line, 1 lines/tag, 2-way associative Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: L2 internal cache: 1 kbytes, 64 bytes/line, 1 lines/tag, 8-way associative Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: real memory = 268353536 (262064K bytes) Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: Physical memory chunk(s): Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: 0x00001000 - 0x0009efff, 647168 bytes (158 pages) Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: 0x0035b000 - 0x0ffe3fff, 264802304 bytes (64649 pages) Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: avail memory = 258048000 (252000K bytes) Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: bios32: Found BIOS32 Service Directory header at 0xc00f92a0 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: bios32: Entry = 0xf0ef0 (c00f0ef0) Rev = 0 Len = 1 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: pcibios: PCI BIOS entry at 0x10f0 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: pnpbios: Found PnP BIOS data at 0xc00fc2b0 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: pnpbios: Entry = f0000:c2e0 Rev = 1.0 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: pnpbios: OEM ID cd041 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: Other BIOS signatures found: Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: ACPI: 000f6730 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: pci_open(1): mode 1 addr port (0x0cf8) is 0x80000060 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: pci_open(1a): mode1res=0x80000000 (0x80000000) Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: pci_cfgcheck: device 0 [class=060000] [hdr=00] is there (id=03051106) Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: pcib-: pcib0 exists, using next available unit number Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: apm0: on motherboard Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: apm: found APM BIOS v1.2, connected at v1.2 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: npx0: on motherboard Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: npx0: INT 16 interface Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: pci_open(1): mode 1 addr port (0x0cf8) is 0x00000000 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: pci_open(1a): mode1res=0x80000000 (0x80000000) Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: pci_cfgcheck: device 0 [class=060000] [hdr=00] is there (id=03051106) Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: pcib0: on motherboard Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: found-> vendor=0x1106, dev=0x0305, revid=0x02 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: class=06-00-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: subordinatebus=0 secondarybus=0 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: map[10]: type 1, range 32, base d0000000, size 28 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: found-> vendor=0x1106, dev=0x8305, revid=0x00 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: class=06-04-00, hdrtype=0x01, mfdev=0 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: subordinatebus=1 secondarybus=1 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: found-> vendor=0x1106, dev=0x0686, revid=0x22 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: class=06-01-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=1 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: subordinatebus=0 secondarybus=0 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: found-> vendor=0x1106, dev=0x0571, revid=0x10 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: class=01-01-8a, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: subordinatebus=0 secondarybus=0 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: map[20]: type 1, range 32, base 0000d800, size 4 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: found-> vendor=0x1106, dev=0x3038, revid=0x10 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: class=0c-03-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: subordinatebus=0 secondarybus=0 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: intpin=d, irq=9 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: map[20]: type 1, range 32, base 0000d400, size 5 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: found-> vendor=0x1106, dev=0x3038, revid=0x10 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: class=0c-03-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: subordinatebus=0 secondarybus=0 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: intpin=d, irq=9 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: map[20]: type 1, range 32, base 0000d000, size 5 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: found-> vendor=0x1106, dev=0x3057, revid=0x30 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: class=06-00-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: subordinatebus=0 secondarybus=0 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: found-> vendor=0x10b8, dev=0x0005, revid=0x06 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: class=02-00-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: subordinatebus=0 secondarybus=0 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: intpin=a, irq=5 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: map[10]: type 1, range 32, base 0000a400, size 8 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: map[14]: type 1, range 32, base cc000000, size 12 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: found-> vendor=0x1274, dev=0x1371, revid=0x06 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: class=04-01-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: subordinatebus=0 secondarybus=0 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: intpin=a, irq=10 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: map[10]: type 1, range 32, base 0000a000, size 6 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: found-> vendor=0x9004, dev=0x6178, revid=0x03 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: class=01-00-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: subordinatebus=0 secondarybus=0 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: intpin=a, irq=11 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: map[10]: type 1, range 32, base 00009800, size 8 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: map[14]: type 1, range 32, base cb800000, size 12 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: found-> vendor=0x105a, dev=0x0d30, revid=0x02 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: class=01-80-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: subordinatebus=0 secondarybus=0 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: intpin=a, irq=10 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: map[10]: type 1, range 32, base 00009400, size 3 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: map[14]: type 1, range 32, base 00009000, size 2 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: map[18]: type 1, range 32, base 00008800, size 3 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: map[1c]: type 1, range 32, base 00008400, size 2 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: map[20]: type 1, range 32, base 00008000, size 6 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: map[24]: type 1, range 32, base cb000000, size 17 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: pci0: on pcib0 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: agp0: mem 0xd0000000-0xdfffffff at device 0.0 on pci0 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: agp0: allocating GATT for aperture of size 256M Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: pcib2: at device 1.0 on pci0 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: found-> vendor=0x102b, dev=0x0525, revid=0x04 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: class=03-00-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: subordinatebus=0 secondarybus=0 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: intpin=a, irq=11 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: map[10]: type 1, range 32, base ce000000, size 25 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: map[14]: type 1, range 32, base cd000000, size 14 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: map[18]: type 1, range 32, base cc800000, size 23 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: pci1: on pcib2 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: pci1: (vendor=0x102b, dev=0x0525) at 0.0 irq 11 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: isab0: at device 4.0 on pci0 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: isa0: on isab0 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: atapci0: port 0xd800-0xd80f at device 4.1 on pci0 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: ata0: iobase=0x01f0 altiobase=0x03f6 bmaddr=0xd800 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: ata0: mask=03 status0=50 status1=50 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: ata0: mask=03 status0=50 status1=50 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: ata0: devices = 0x3 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: ata1: iobase=0x0170 altiobase=0x0376 bmaddr=0xd808 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: ata1: mask=03 status0=50 status1=00 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: ata1: mask=03 status0=00 status1=00 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: ata1: devices = 0x4 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: uhci0: port 0xd400-0xd41f irq 9 at device 4.2 on pci0 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: usb0: on uhci0 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: usb0: USB revision 1.0 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: uhub0: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: uhci1: port 0xd000-0xd01f irq 9 at device 4.3 on pci0 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: using shared irq9. Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: usb1: on uhci1 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: usb1: USB revision 1.0 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: uhub1: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: uhub2: ALCOR Generic USB Hub, class 9/0, rev 1.10/1.00, addr 2 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: uhub2: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: tx0: port 0xa400-0xa4ff mem 0xcc000000-0xcc000fff irq 5 at device 10.0 on pci0 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: tx0: address 00:e0:29:0b:d5:31, type SMC9432TX, Auto-Neg 10Mbps bpf: tx0 attached Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: tx0: driver is using old-style compatability shims Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: pcm0: port 0xa000-0xa03f irq 10 at device 11.0 on pci0 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: pcm0: ac97 codec id 0x54524102 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: pcm0: ac97 codec features 6 bit master volume, Binaura 3D Audio Enhancement Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: pcm: setmap fcbb000, 1000; 0xc0c3d000 -> fcbb000 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: pcm: setmap fcb0000, 1000; 0xc0c48000 -> fcb0000 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: ahc0: port 0x9800-0x98ff mem 0xcb800000-0xcb800fff irq 11 at device 12.0 on pci0 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: ahc0: Reading SEEPROM...done. Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: ahc0: internal 50 cable is present, internal 68 cable not present Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: ahc0: external cable not present Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: ahc0: BIOS eeprom not present Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: ahc0: Low byte termination Enabled Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: ahc0: aic7860 Single Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 3/255 SCBs Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: ahc0: Downloading Sequencer Program... 413 instructions downloaded Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: atapci1: port 0x8000-0x803f,0x8400-0x8403,0x8800-0x8807,0x9000-0x9003,0x9400-0x9407 mem 0xcb000000-0xcb01ffff irq 10 at device 17.0 on pci0 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: ata-: ata2 exists, using next available unit number Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: ata2: iobase=0x9400 altiobase=0x9000 bmaddr=0x8000 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: ata2: mask=03 status0=08 status1=08 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: ata2: mask=03 status0=08 status1=08 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: ata2: devices = 0x3 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: ata2: at 0x9400 on atapci1 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: using shared irq10. Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: ata3: iobase=0x8800 altiobase=0x8400 bmaddr=0x8008 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: ata3: mask=03 status0=08 status1=08 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: ata3: mask=03 status0=08 status1=08 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: ata3: devices = 0x3 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: ata3: at 0x8800 on atapci1 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: pci_open(1): mode 1 addr port (0x0cf8) is 0x00000000 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: pci_open(1a): mode1res=0x80000000 (0x80000000) Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: pci_cfgcheck: device 0 [class=060000] [hdr=00] is there (id=03051106) Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: pci-: pci1 exists, using next available unit number Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: pcib1: on motherboard Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: pci2: on pcib1 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: Trying Read_Port at 203 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: Trying Read_Port at 243 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: Trying Read_Port at 283 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: Trying Read_Port at 2c3 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: Trying Read_Port at 303 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: Trying Read_Port at 343 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: Trying Read_Port at 383 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: Trying Read_Port at 3c3 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: isa_probe_children: disabling PnP devices Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: isa_probe_children: probing non-PnP devices Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: kbd0: atkbd0, generic (0), config:0x0, flags:0x3f0000 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: psm0: current command byte:0047 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: kbdc: TEST_AUX_PORT status:0000 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: kbdc: RESET_AUX return code:00fa Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: kbdc: RESET_AUX status:00aa Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: kbdc: RESET_AUX ID:0000 Sep 17 15:47:51 adsl /kernel.old: psm: status 00 02 64 Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: psm: status 00 00 64 Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: psm: status 00 03 64 Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: psm: status 00 03 64 Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: psm: data 08 00 00 Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: psm: status 10 00 64 Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: psm: status 00 02 64 Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: psm: data 08 00 00 Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: psm: status 00 02 64 Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: psm0: model Generic PS/2 mouse, device ID 0-00, 2 buttons Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: psm0: config:00000000, flags:00000000, packet size:3 Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: psm0: syncmask:c0, syncbits:00 Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: fb0: vga0, vga, type:VGA (5), flags:0x7007f Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: fb0: port:0x3c0-0x3df, crtc:0x3d4, mem:0xa0000 0x20000 Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: fb0: init mode:24, bios mode:3, current mode:24 Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: fb0: window:0xc00b8000 size:32k gran:32k, buf:0 size:32k Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: VGA parameters upon power-up Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: 50 18 10 00 00 00 03 00 02 67 5f 4f 50 82 55 81 Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: bf 1f 00 4f 0d 0e 00 00 07 80 9c 8e 8f 28 1f 96 Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: b9 a3 ff 00 01 02 03 04 05 14 07 38 39 3a 3b 3c Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: 3d 3e 3f 0c 00 0f 08 00 00 00 00 00 10 0e 00 ff Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: VGA parameters in BIOS for mode 24 Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: 50 18 10 00 10 00 03 00 02 67 5f 4f 50 82 55 81 Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: bf 1f 00 4f 0d 0e 00 00 00 00 9c 8e 8f 28 1f 96 Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: b9 a3 ff 00 01 02 03 04 05 14 07 38 39 3a 3b 3c Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: 3d 3e 3f 0c 00 0f 08 00 00 00 00 00 10 0e 00 ff Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: EGA/VGA parameters to be used for mode 24 Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: 50 18 10 00 10 00 03 00 02 67 5f 4f 50 82 55 81 Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: bf 1f 00 4f 0d 0e 00 00 00 00 9c 8e 8f 28 1f 96 Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: b9 a3 ff 00 01 02 03 04 05 14 07 38 39 3a 3b 3c Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: 3d 3e 3f 0c 00 0f 08 00 00 00 00 00 10 0e 00 ff Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: sc0: on isa0 Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x200> Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: sc0: fb0, kbd0, terminal emulator: sc (syscons terminal) Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: fdc0: at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa0 Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: sio0: irq maps: 0x1 0x11 0x1 0x1 Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: sio0: type 16550A Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: sio1: irq maps: 0x1 0x9 0x1 0x1 Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: sio1 at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa0 Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: sio1: type 16550A Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: ppc0: parallel port found at 0x378 Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: ppc0: using extended I/O port range Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: ppc0: ECP SPP ECP+EPP SPP Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: ppc0: at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0 Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: ppc0: SMC-like chipset (ECP/EPP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/8 bytes threshold Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: lpt0: on ppbus0 Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: lpt0: Interrupt-driven port Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: isa_probe_children: probing PnP devices Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: BIOS Geometries: Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: 0:03fffe3f 0..1023=1024 cylinders, 0..254=255 heads, 1..63=63 sectors Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: 1:03fffe3f 0..1023=1024 cylinders, 0..254=255 heads, 1..63=63 sectors Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: 0 accounted for Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: Device configuration finished. Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: bpf: ppp0 attached Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: bpf: ppp1 attached Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: new masks: bio 68c640, tty 63149a, net 6714ba Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: bpf: ds0 attached Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: bpf: lo0 attached Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: IP Filter: v3.4.8 initialized. Default = pass all, Logging = enabled Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: ata2-slave: ata_command: timeout waiting for intr Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: ata2-slave: identify failed Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: ata2-master: ata_command: timeout waiting for intr Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: ata2-master: identify failed Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: ata3-slave: ata_command: timeout waiting for intr Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: ata3-slave: identify failed Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: ata3-master: ata_command: timeout waiting for intr Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: ata3-master: identify failed Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: ata0-master: DMA limited to UDMA33, non-ATA66 compliant cable Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: ata0-master: success setting UDMA2 on VIA chip Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: ad0: ATA-4 disk at ata0 as master Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: ad0: 19574MB (40088160 sectors), 39770 cyls, 16 heads, 63 S/T, 512 B/S Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: ad0: 16 secs/int, 32 depth queue, UDMA33 Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: ad0: piomode=4 dmamode=2 udmamode=4 cblid=0 Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: Creating DISK ad0 Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: Creating DISK wd0 Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: ata0-slave: success setting UDMA2 on VIA chip Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: ad1: ATA-4 disk at ata0 as slave Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: ad1: 10300MB (21095424 sectors), 20928 cyls, 16 heads, 63 S/T, 512 B/S Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: ad1: 16 secs/int, 1 depth queue, UDMA33 Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: ad1: piomode=4 dmamode=2 udmamode=2 cblid=0 Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: Creating DISK ad1 Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: Creating DISK wd1 Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: ata1-master: piomode=4 dmamode=2 udmamode=2 dmaflag=1 Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: ata1-master: success setting UDMA2 on VIA chip Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: acd0: DVD-ROM drive at ata1 as master Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: acd0: 512KB buffer, UDMA33 Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: acd0: Reads: CD-R, CD-RW, CD-DA stream, DVD-ROM, DVD-R Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: acd0: Audio: play, 256 volume levels Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: acd0: Mechanism: ejectable tray Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: acd0: Medium: no/blank disc inside, unlocked Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: Waiting 8 seconds for SCSI devices to settle Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: (noperiph:ahc0:0:-1:-1): SCSI bus reset delivered. 0 SCBs aborted. Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: (probe5:ahc0:0:5:0): INQUIRY. CDB: 12 1 80 0 ff 0 Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: (probe5:ahc0:0:5:0): ILLEGAL REQUEST asc:24,0 Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: (probe5:ahc0:0:5:0): Invalid field in CDB Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: ahc0: target 5 synchronous at 8.0MHz, offset = 0xf Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: Creating DISK cd0 Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: Mounting root from ufs:ad0s3a Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: ad0s1: type 0xc, start 11358018, end = 23840459, size 12482442 : OK Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: ad0s3: type 0xa5, start 63, end = 11357954, size 11357892 : OK Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: (cd0:ahc0:0:5:0): READ CD RECORDED CAPACITY. CDB: 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: (cd0:ahc0:0:5:0): NOT READY asc:3a,1 Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: (cd0:ahc0:0:5:0): Medium not present - tray closed Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: cd0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 5 lun 0 Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-2 device Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: cd0: 8.333MB/s transfers (8.333MHz, offset 15) Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: cd0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present - tray closed Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: start_init: trying /sbin/init Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: ad1s1: type 0xc, start 63, end = 21093344, size 21093282 : OK Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: ad1s3: type 0x0, start 0, end = 4294967295, size 0 Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: ad1s3: C/H/S start 1022/254/63 (16434494) != start 0: invalid Sep 17 15:47:52 adsl /kernel.old: ad1s3: C/H/S end 1022/254/63 (16434494) != end 4294967295: invalid and here's the current output: Copyright (c) 1992-2000 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 4.2-BETA #0: Sun Nov 12 18:09:34 GMT 2000 root@not.irrelevant.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SIMOND Calibrating clock(s) ... TSC clock: 655788420 Hz, i8254 clock: 1193089 Hz CLK_USE_I8254_CALIBRATION not specified - using default frequency Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz CLK_USE_TSC_CALIBRATION not specified - using old calibration method CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) Processor (655.85-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x630 Stepping = 0 Features=0x183f9ff AMD Features=0xc0440000<,AMIE,DSP,3DNow!> Data TLB: 24 entries, fully associative Instruction TLB: 16 entries, fully associative L1 data cache: 64 kbytes, 64 bytes/line, 1 lines/tag, 2-way associative L1 instruction cache: 64 kbytes, 64 bytes/line, 1 lines/tag, 2-way associative L2 internal cache: 1 kbytes, 64 bytes/line, 1 lines/tag, 8-way associative real memory = 268353536 (262064K bytes) Physical memory chunk(s): 0x00001000 - 0x0009efff, 647168 bytes (158 pages) 0x00361000 - 0x0ffe3fff, 264777728 bytes (64643 pages) avail memory = 258023424 (251976K bytes) bios32: Found BIOS32 Service Directory header at 0xc00f92a0 bios32: Entry = 0xf0ef0 (c00f0ef0) Rev = 0 Len = 1 pcibios: PCI BIOS entry at 0x10f0 pnpbios: Found PnP BIOS data at 0xc00fc2b0 pnpbios: Entry = f0000:c2e0 Rev = 1.0 pnpbios: OEM ID cd041 Other BIOS signatures found: ACPI: 000f6730 Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc0348000. Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled pci_open(1): mode 1 addr port (0x0cf8) is 0x80000060 pci_open(1a): mode1res=0x80000000 (0x80000000) pci_cfgcheck: device 0 [class=060000] [hdr=00] is there (id=03051106) pcib-: pcib0 exists, using next available unit number apm0: on motherboard apm: found APM BIOS v1.2, connected at v1.2 npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pci_open(1): mode 1 addr port (0x0cf8) is 0x00000000 pci_open(1a): mode1res=0x80000000 (0x80000000) pci_cfgcheck: device 0 [class=060000] [hdr=00] is there (id=03051106) pcib0: on motherboard found-> vendor=0x1106, dev=0x0305, revid=0x02 class=06-00-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 subordinatebus=0 secondarybus=0 map[10]: type 1, range 32, base e0000000, size 27 found-> vendor=0x1106, dev=0x8305, revid=0x00 class=06-04-00, hdrtype=0x01, mfdev=0 subordinatebus=1 secondarybus=1 found-> vendor=0x1106, dev=0x0686, revid=0x22 class=06-01-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=1 subordinatebus=0 secondarybus=0 found-> vendor=0x1106, dev=0x0571, revid=0x10 class=01-01-8a, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 subordinatebus=0 secondarybus=0 map[20]: type 1, range 32, base 0000d800, size 4 found-> vendor=0x1106, dev=0x3038, revid=0x10 class=0c-03-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 subordinatebus=0 secondarybus=0 intpin=d, irq=9 map[20]: type 1, range 32, base 0000d400, size 5 found-> vendor=0x1106, dev=0x3038, revid=0x10 class=0c-03-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 subordinatebus=0 secondarybus=0 intpin=d, irq=9 map[20]: type 1, range 32, base 0000d000, size 5 found-> vendor=0x1106, dev=0x3057, revid=0x30 class=06-00-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 subordinatebus=0 secondarybus=0 found-> vendor=0x10b8, dev=0x0005, revid=0x06 class=02-00-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 subordinatebus=0 secondarybus=0 intpin=a, irq=5 map[10]: type 1, range 32, base 0000a400, size 8 map[14]: type 1, range 32, base dc000000, size 12 found-> vendor=0x1274, dev=0x1371, revid=0x06 class=04-01-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 subordinatebus=0 secondarybus=0 intpin=a, irq=10 map[10]: type 1, range 32, base 0000a000, size 6 found-> vendor=0x9004, dev=0x6178, revid=0x03 class=01-00-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 subordinatebus=0 secondarybus=0 intpin=a, irq=11 map[10]: type 1, range 32, base 00009800, size 8 map[14]: type 1, range 32, base db800000, size 12 found-> vendor=0x105a, dev=0x0d30, revid=0x02 class=01-80-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 subordinatebus=0 secondarybus=0 intpin=a, irq=10 map[10]: type 1, range 32, base 00009400, size 3 map[14]: type 1, range 32, base 00009000, size 2 map[18]: type 1, range 32, base 00008800, size 3 map[1c]: type 1, range 32, base 00008400, size 2 map[20]: type 1, range 32, base 00008000, size 6 map[24]: type 1, range 32, base db000000, size 17 pci0: on pcib0 agp0: mem 0xe0000000-0xe7ffffff at device 0.0 on pci0 agp0: allocating GATT for aperture of size 256M pcib2: at device 1.0 on pci0 found-> vendor=0x102b, dev=0x0525, revid=0x04 class=03-00-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 subordinatebus=0 secondarybus=0 intpin=a, irq=11 map[10]: type 1, range 32, base de000000, size 25 map[14]: type 1, range 32, base dd000000, size 14 map[18]: type 1, range 32, base dc800000, size 23 pci1: on pcib2 pci1: (vendor=0x102b, dev=0x0525) at 0.0 irq 11 isab0: at device 4.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0xd800-0xd80f at device 4.1 on pci0 ata0: iobase=0x01f0 altiobase=0x03f6 bmaddr=0xd800 ata0: mask=03 status0=50 status1=00 ata0: mask=03 status0=50 status1=00 ata0: devices = 0x1 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata1: iobase=0x0170 altiobase=0x0376 bmaddr=0xd808 ata1: mask=00 status0=50 status1=00 ata1: probe allocation failed uhci0: port 0xd400-0xd41f irq 9 at device 4.2 on pci0 usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci1: port 0xd000-0xd01f irq 9 at device 4.3 on pci0 using shared irq9. usb1: on uhci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhub2: ALCOR Generic USB Hub, class 9/0, rev 1.10/1.00, addr 2 uhub2: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered tx0: port 0xa400-0xa4ff mem 0xdc000000-0xdc000fff irq 5 at device 10.0 on pci0 miibus0: on tx0 nsphy0: on miibus0 nsphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto tx0: address 00:e0:29:0b:d5:31, type SMC9432TX bpf: tx0 attached pcm0: port 0xa000-0xa03f irq 10 at device 11.0 on pci0 pcm0: ac97 codec id 0x54524102 pcm0: ac97 codec features 6 bit master volume, Binaura 3D Audio Enhancement pcm: setmap fcd0000, 1000; 0xc0c3c000 -> fcd0000 pcm: setmap fc9b000, 1000; 0xc0c47000 -> fc9b000 ahc0: port 0x9800-0x98ff mem 0xdb800000-0xdb800fff irq 11 at device 12.0 on pci0 ahc0: Reading SEEPROM...done. ahc0: internal 50 cable is present, internal 68 cable not present ahc0: external cable not present ahc0: BIOS eeprom not present ahc0: Low byte termination Enabled ahc0: Downloading Sequencer Program... 436 instructions downloaded aic7860: Single Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 3/255 SCBs atapci1: port 0x8000-0x803f,0x8400-0x8403,0x8800-0x8807,0x9000-0x9003,0x9400-0x9407 mem 0xdb000000-0xdb01ffff irq 10 at device 17.0 on pci0 ata-: ata2 exists, using next available unit number ata2: iobase=0x9400 altiobase=0x9002 bmaddr=0x8000 ata2: mask=03 status0=50 status1=00 ata2: mask=03 status0=50 status1=00 ata2: devices = 0x1 ata2: at 0x9400 on atapci1 using shared irq10. ata3: iobase=0x8800 altiobase=0x8402 bmaddr=0x8008 ata3: mask=00 status0=ff status1=ff ata3: probe allocation failed pci_open(1): mode 1 addr port (0x0cf8) is 0x00000000 pci_open(1a): mode1res=0x80000000 (0x80000000) pci_cfgcheck: device 0 [class=060000] [hdr=00] is there (id=03051106) pci-: pci1 exists, using next available unit number pcib1: on motherboard pci2: on pcib1 Trying Read_Port at 203 Trying Read_Port at 243 Trying Read_Port at 283 Trying Read_Port at 2c3 Trying Read_Port at 303 Trying Read_Port at 343 Trying Read_Port at 383 Trying Read_Port at 3c3 isa_probe_children: disabling PnP devices isa_probe_children: probing non-PnP devices atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0: atkbd0, generic (0), config:0x0, flags:0x3f0000 psm0: current command byte:0047 kbdc: TEST_AUX_PORT status:0000 kbdc: RESET_AUX return code:00fa kbdc: RESET_AUX status:00aa kbdc: RESET_AUX ID:0000 psm: status 00 02 64 psm: status 00 00 64 psm: status 00 03 64 psm: status 00 03 64 psm: data 08 00 00 psm: status 10 00 64 psm: status 00 02 64 psm: data 08 00 00 psm: status 00 02 64 psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: model Generic PS/2 mouse, device ID 0-00, 2 buttons psm0: config:00000000, flags:00000000, packet size:3 psm0: syncmask:c0, syncbits:00 vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 fb0: vga0, vga, type:VGA (5), flags:0x7007f fb0: port:0x3c0-0x3df, crtc:0x3d4, mem:0xa0000 0x20000 fb0: init mode:24, bios mode:3, current mode:24 fb0: window:0xc00b8000 size:32k gran:32k, buf:0 size:32k VGA parameters upon power-up 50 18 10 00 00 00 03 00 02 67 5f 4f 50 82 55 81 bf 1f 00 4f 0d 0e 00 00 07 80 9c 8e 8f 28 1f 96 b9 a3 ff 00 01 02 03 04 05 14 07 38 39 3a 3b 3c 3d 3e 3f 0c 00 0f 08 00 00 00 00 00 10 0e 00 ff VGA parameters in BIOS for mode 24 50 18 10 00 10 00 03 00 02 67 5f 4f 50 82 55 81 bf 1f 00 4f 0d 0e 00 00 00 00 9c 8e 8f 28 1f 96 b9 a3 ff 00 01 02 03 04 05 14 07 38 39 3a 3b 3c 3d 3e 3f 0c 00 0f 08 00 00 00 00 00 10 0e 00 ff EGA/VGA parameters to be used for mode 24 50 18 10 00 10 00 03 00 02 67 5f 4f 50 82 55 81 bf 1f 00 4f 0d 0e 00 00 00 00 9c 8e 8f 28 1f 96 b9 a3 ff 00 01 02 03 04 05 14 07 38 39 3a 3b 3c 3d 3e 3f 0c 00 0f 08 00 00 00 00 00 10 0e 00 ff sc0: on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x200> sc0: fb0, kbd0, terminal emulator: sc (syscons terminal) fdc0: at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa0 fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 sio0: irq maps: 0x1 0x11 0x1 0x1 sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 sio0: type 16550A sio1: irq maps: 0x1 0x9 0x1 0x1 sio1 at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa0 sio1: type 16550A ppc0: parallel port found at 0x378 ppc0: using extended I/O port range ppc0: ECP SPP ECP+EPP SPP ppc0: at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0 ppc0: SMC-like chipset (ECP/EPP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/8 bytes threshold lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port isa_probe_children: probing PnP devices BIOS Geometries: 0:03fffe3f 0..1023=1024 cylinders, 0..254=255 heads, 1..63=63 sectors 0 accounted for Device configuration finished. bpf: ds0 attached bpf: lo0 attached bpf: ppp0 attached bpf: ppp1 attached new masks: bio 684640, tty 63149a, net 6714ba Linux-ELF exec handler installed IP Filter: v3.4.8 initialized. Default = pass all, Logging = enabled ata0-master: success setting UDMA4 on VIA chip Creating DISK ad0 Creating DISK wd0 ad0: ATA-4 disk at ata0-master ad0: 2016MB (4128768 sectors), 4096 cyls, 16 heads, 63 S/T, 512 B/S ad0: 16 secs/int, 1 depth queue, UDMA66 ad0: piomode=4 dmamode=2 udmamode=4 cblid=1 ad0: 2016MB [4096/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA66 ata2-master: success setting UDMA5 on Promise chip Creating DISK ad4 Creating DISK wd4 ad4: ATA-5 disk at ata2-master ad4: 43979MB (90069840 sectors), 89355 cyls, 16 heads, 63 S/T, 512 B/S ad4: 16 secs/int, 1 depth queue, UDMA100 ad4: piomode=4 dmamode=2 udmamode=5 cblid=1 Promise check1 failed ad4: 43979MB [89355/16/63] at ata2-master UDMA100 Waiting 8 seconds for SCSI devices to settle (noperiph:ahc0:0:-1:-1): SCSI bus reset delivered. 0 SCBs aborted. (probe5:ahc0:0:5:0): INQUIRY. CDB: 12 1 80 0 ff 0 (probe5:ahc0:0:5:0): ILLEGAL REQUEST asc:24,0 (probe5:ahc0:0:5:0): Invalid field in CDB (ahc0:A:5:0): Sending SDTR period c, offset f (ahc0:A:5:0): Received SDTR period 1e, offset f Filtered to period 1e, offset f ahc0: target 5 synchronous at 8.0MHz, offset = 0xf (ahc0:A:5:0): Sending SDTR period 1e, offset f (ahc0:A:5:0): Received SDTR period 1e, offset f Filtered to period 1e, offset f Creating DISK cd0 pass0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 5 lun 0 pass0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-2 device pass0: 8.333MB/s transfers (8.333MHz, offset 15) Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s3a (ahc0:A:5:0): Sending SDTR period 1e, offset f (ahc0:A:5:0): Received SDTR period 1e, offset f Filtered to period 1e, offset f (ahc0:A:5:0): Sending SDTR period 1e, offset f (ahc0:A:5:0): Received SDTR period 1e, offset f Filtered to period 1e, offset f (cd0:ahc0:0:5:0): READ CD RECORDED CAPACITY. CDB: 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (cd0:ahc0:0:5:0): NOT READY asc:3a,1 (cd0:ahc0:0:5:0): Medium not present - tray closed cd0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 5 lun 0 cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-2 device cd0: 8.333MB/s transfers (8.333MHz, offset 15) cd0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present - tray closed ad0s1: type 0xc, start 11358018, end = 32499494, size 21141477 : OK ad0s3: type 0xa5, start 63, end = 11357954, size 11357892 : OK ad0s1: slice starts beyond end of the disk: rejecting it ad0s3: slice extends beyond end of disk: truncating from 11357892 to 4128705 sectors ad0: raw partition size != slice size ad0: start 63, end 4128767, size 4128705 ad0c: start 63, end 11357954, size 11357892 ad0: truncating raw partition ad0: rejecting partition in BSD label: it isn't entirely within the slice ad0: start 63, end 4128767, size 4128705 ad0f: start 819263, end 11357954, size 10538692 start_init: trying /sbin/init ad4s1: type 0xc, start 63, end = 90060389, size 90060327 : OK Thanks if anyone can help me with this! -- Simon Dick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 10:29:55 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from rs3s4.datacenter.cha.cantv.net (rs3s4.datacenter.cha.cantv.net [200.44.32.53]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 582D137B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 10:29:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jbolivar@cantv.net) Received: from jbolivar (tc1r6-289.ras.cha.cantv.net [200.44.2.33]) by rs3s4.datacenter.cha.cantv.net (8.10.2/8.10.2/2.0) with SMTP id f2BITpR07290 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 14:29:51 -0400 From: "Julian Bolivar" To: Subject: FreeBSD 4.3 Release... Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 14:29:54 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, please the FreeBSD 4.3 Release is on time? (to March 2001), because I preorder it and I check that I scheduled mount the server with it at the April's first week, or I need to reschedule this project. Thanks. Julian Bolivar To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 10:53:38 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from web10706.mail.yahoo.com (web10706.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.130.214]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 092E537B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 10:53:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from l8tr2000@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20010311185334.44513.qmail@web10706.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [63.204.177.211] by web10706.mail.yahoo.com; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 10:53:34 PST Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 10:53:34 -0800 (PST) From: Steve Subject: bzflag port I just made. To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi all i'm trying to convert the latest source to a port I think i've done just about everything that I need to accept i'm getting this error: ===> Building for bzflag-1.7e.1 make -f Make-sys targets "./Make-common", line 170: Need an operator "./Make-common", line 173: Need an operator "./Make-common", line 176: Need an operator "././config", line 37: Need an operator "././config", line 39: Need an operator make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue *** Error code 1 I'm not sure how to fix this. If you have an answer can you please respond in non techno speak. I'm not super code savy and may not understand a super technical response. Thanks in advance. Steve (l8tr2000@yahoo.com) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices. http://auctions.yahoo.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 11: 0:56 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from shakeyjakes.com (cx658371-a.elcjn1.sdca.home.com [24.13.29.199]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B4E8437B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 11:00:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike.mcclain@shakeyjakes.com) Received: by shakeyjakes.com (wcMail) id 12505W Sun, 11 Mar 2001 10:59:45 -0800 From: mike.mcclain@shakeyjakes.com Subject: Help!!! 2nd HD gone Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 10:59:45 -0800 Message-Id: <1885275359@shakeyjakes.com> Organization: Shakey Jake's Free BBS from Santee, Ca... To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: wcMail v5.4.449.1 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Howdy, fbsd:~> uname -a FreeBSD playground 3.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE #1: Sun Mar 26 16:56:35 PST 2000 root@:/usr/src/sys/compile/McKERNEL i386 From dmesg: CPU: Pentium/P55C (167.05-MHz 586-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x543 Stepping = 3 Features=0x8001bf real memory = 33554432 (32768K bytes) chip0: rev 0x01 on pci0.0.0 chip1: rev 0x01 on pci0.7.0 ide_pci0: rev 0x01 on pci0.7.1 chip2: rev 0x01 on pci0.7.3 wdc0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7 irq 14 on isa wdc1 not found at 0x170 This makes me think the kernal is not seeing the controller at boot. from /sys/i386/conf/McKERNEL: controller wdc0 at isa? port "IO_WD1" bio irq 14 controller wdc1 at isa? port "IO_WD2" bio irq 15 from /usr/src/sys/i386/isa/isa.h: #define IO_WD1 0x1F0 /* Primary Fixed Disk Controller */ #define IO_WD2 0x170 /* Secondary Fixed Disk Controller */ wd2 aka D: aka /dev/hdc is visible from dos and I'm writing this from Slackware 7.0 mounted on /dev/hdc8. This from Slackware's /var/log/messages: Mar 7 13:28:39 playground kernel: hda: WDC AC24300L, 4112MB w/256kB Cache, CHS=524/255/63, UDMA Mar 7 13:28:39 playground kernel: hdc: WDC AC26400R, 6149MB w/512kB Cache, CHS=13328/15/63, (U)DMA I once had several slices on wd2s* mounted in /etc/fstab but that doesn't work today. I'm fairly this is something I broke in FreeBSD but can't discover where. I really don't want to re-install. I've tried various configurations in BIOS with no luck. I'm stumped. All suggestions welcome. TIA, MiKe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 11:11: 0 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.hutchtel.net (ns1.hutchtel.net [206.9.112.100]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 808BC37B71A for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 11:10:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jpaetzel@hutchtel.net) Received: from mark9 (hutch-841.hutchtel.net [206.10.71.169]) by ns1.hutchtel.net (8.9.1/8.9.0) with SMTP id NAA17472; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 13:10:42 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <002601c0ab28$2fd98540$6100000a@vladsempire.net> From: "Josh Paetzel" To: , "Jorge Biquez" References: <5.0.2.1.2.20010310221804.02578a50@icsmx.com> Subject: Re: Load Balancing .... Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 13:10:15 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jorge Biquez" To: Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2001 10:23 PM Subject: Load Balancing .... > Hello all. > > I'm running FreeBSD 3.2 with apache without problems. I decided to have 2 > machines running my sites and use load balancing on my radios. It is > working very good. Actually I FTP all the new information on both servers > when I need to make changes. > > I'm not a FreeBSD expert but learning and I was wondering if you could give > me your advice on how to have both machines updated identical the > best way. > > By the way. Those machines do not have any other users but me so security > and permissions for other users is not important. > > Thanks in advance for all your comments. If you feel like answer me > privately, this is my email: jbiquez@icsmx.com > > JB > > Personally I would just put the information on one machine, and then mount it to the other via NFS. Josh > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 11:14:49 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from smtp-server1.tampabay.rr.com (smtp-server1.tampabay.rr.com [65.32.1.34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4011737B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 11:14:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from meconlen@obfuscated.net) Received: from clarity (24129168hfc216.tampabay.rr.com [24.129.168.216]) by smtp-server1.tampabay.rr.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with SMTP id f2BGOk025804; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 11:24:48 -0500 (EST) From: "Michael Conlen" To: "Alexander" , Subject: RE: IPSEC Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 11:19:13 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 In-reply-to: Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I've found mpd works pretty well. Read the instructions, print them out, read the printed copy, then read again taking notes, and you will be OK. Having not done this it was a bit of a pain to setup, but once I read everything it went well :) I can do IPSec and PPTP (if I really want to) tunnels. -- Groove On Dude Michael Conlen Obfuscated Networking meconlen@obfuscated.net > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Alexander > Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2001 6:30 AM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: IPSEC > > > What is the usual way to create tunnel between 2 gateways ? > I've read some howtos that I found on some bsd sites and there is > said about encrypting already made tunnel but nowhere is said how to > create that tunnel ? (like brining up tun0 devices) > I also found howto about pipsecd but it doesn't work. > Somehow when I compile "options IPSEC" in the kernel the pipsecd doesn't > want to run. It tells me that it can't get SOCK_RAW > And when I remove IPSEC from the kernel it doesn't work propertly. > I configure both sides of the tunnel and run pipsecd and it tells me that > hmac authorization failed. (and the configs on both sides are correct, > keys are correct, I took them from a working howto) > I also read about making tunnel using ppp and encrypting it with ssh but > it sux. There should be other way because there is alot of howtos about > IPSEC and the pipsecd and ppp with ssh doesn't include it. ( I mean > setting your keys with setkey and running racoon etc..) > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 11:28: 9 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from hotmail.com (oe73.law11.hotmail.com [64.4.16.208]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF66B37B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 11:28:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bradley_watts@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 11:28:06 -0800 X-Originating-IP: [24.68.123.209] From: "Brad Watts" To: "BSD" Subject: snmpd Error Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 14:22:47 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Mar 2001 19:28:06.0026 (UTC) FILETIME=[65A55EA0:01C0AA61] Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I getting the following errors when attempting to launch my snmp daemon (below), which I downloaded from the ports. Do I need to manually enable the Management Information Bases, as it's not able to find them? Is there documentation on this? home# /usr/local/sbin/snmpd home# Cannot find module (IP-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (IF-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (TCP-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (UDP-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (SNMPv2-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (SNMPv2-SMI): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (UCD-SNMP-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (UCD-DEMO-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (IPV6-ICMP-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (IPV6-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (IPV6-TCP-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (IPV6-UDP-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (SNMP-VIEW-BASED-ACM-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (SNMP-COMMUNITY-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (SNMP-FRAMEWORK-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (SNMP-MPD-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (SNMP-USER-BASED-SM-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Thanks, Brad To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 11:44:11 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from smtp1.sentex.ca (smtp1.sentex.ca [199.212.134.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D99837B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 11:44:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from chimp.simianscience.com (cage.simianscience.com [64.7.134.1]) by smtp1.sentex.ca (8.11.2/8.11.1) with SMTP id f2BJi2V11185; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 14:44:03 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) From: Mike Tancsa To: dennis@magix.com.sg ("dennis") Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 3ware ATA100 raid Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 14:44:02 -0500 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 9 Mar 2001 03:26:19 -0500, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions you = wrote: >Hi, > >Has anyone successful set up a 3ware ATA100 raid 1 or 5 with Freebsd = 4.2? > >Will FreeBSD 4.2 default install detect and configure for the 3ware = ATA100 >raid? I have not tried the ATA100 series, but the 5400 (UDMA 33) and 6400 (UDMA66) work just great and are detected at install time for=20 RAID0,1 and 10. I have not yet tried the RAID-5 yet as it just came out. ---Mike Mike Tancsa (mdtancsa@sentex.net) =09 Sentex Communications Corp, =09 Waterloo, Ontario, Canada "Given enough time, 100 monkeys on 100 routers=20 could setup a national IP network." (KDW2) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 11:47:22 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from smtp1.sentex.ca (smtp1.sentex.ca [199.212.134.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E48F37B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 11:47:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from chimp.simianscience.com (cage.simianscience.com [64.7.134.1]) by smtp1.sentex.ca (8.11.2/8.11.1) with SMTP id f2BJlJV11486; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 14:47:19 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) From: Mike Tancsa To: faze@soon.com ("James J.") Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /dev/cuaa0 problem Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 14:47:18 -0500 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 10 Mar 2001 15:01:16 -0500, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions you = wrote: >hi,=20 > im having this problem with pppd. every time i execute it=20 >it starts to work but then it stops and i look in connect-errors >and it says=20 >" /dev/cuaa0 permission denied " >i tried chmod 4755 /dev/cuaa0 and still same error >the pppd is executed by user uucp and in group dialer >any idea how i can fix this prob ? Does getty have a hold of it ? i.e. did you change /etc/ttys ? If not, = see if a process has it locked fstat /dev/cuaa0 or ls -l /var/spool/lock ---Mike Mike Tancsa (mdtancsa@sentex.net) =09 Sentex Communications Corp, =09 Waterloo, Ontario, Canada "Given enough time, 100 monkeys on 100 routers=20 could setup a national IP network." (KDW2) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 11:55:42 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from smtp1.sentex.ca (smtp1.sentex.ca [199.212.134.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AFC337B719 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 11:55:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from chimp.simianscience.com (cage.simianscience.com [64.7.134.1]) by smtp1.sentex.ca (8.11.2/8.11.1) with SMTP id f2BJtAV12218; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 14:55:10 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) From: Mike Tancsa To: matt@cape-breton-island.com (Matthew Rudderham) Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What Are Standard Procedures For System Backup Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 14:55:10 -0500 Message-ID: <5klnato85jv41qs7nq8gd30ioabd5mn5d1@4ax.com> References: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 10 Mar 2001 22:53:52 -0500, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions you = wrote: >adress tape backup methods, which unfortunately isn't useful to me. I = have >a Win machine on my network with a cd burner, and this would be my >preferred method, or a tarball that could be stored on another >machine on the network would also be an option that I could add to=20 >my cron I suppose? Thanks for the help. You can still use dump and restore, or if you want to pick and choose = only critical files, tar in a pinch. With dump, you can backup a partition to another machine over ssh e.g. /sbin/dump -0uanf - / | ssh -c blowfish remoteuser@example.com dd of=3D/path/to/file/where/dumpfile/will/be/dump-machine-root The blowfish cipher is supposedly faster than 3des and supposedly just as safe. The file on the remote machine can then be manipulated via restore. e.g. restore -i -f dump-machine-root You can then burn this one big file to your cd-r. ---Mike Mike Tancsa (mdtancsa@sentex.net) =09 Sentex Communications Corp, =09 Waterloo, Ontario, Canada "Given enough time, 100 monkeys on 100 routers=20 could setup a national IP network." (KDW2) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 12:18:32 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from intratec.com.mx (intratec.com.mx [200.33.246.239]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2354537B719 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 12:18:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jbiquez@icsmx.com) Received: from jbiquez.intranet.com.mx (200.33.246.129) by intratec.com.mx with ESMTP (Eudora Internet Mail Server 3.0.2) for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 14:17:05 -0600 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010311141325.01d278d0@icsmx.com> X-Sender: jbiquez@icsmx.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 14:15:38 -0600 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG From: Jorge Biquez Subject: Re: Load Balancing .... In-Reply-To: <002601c0ab28$2fd98540$6100000a@vladsempire.net> References: <5.0.2.1.2.20010310221804.02578a50@icsmx.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 01:10 p.m. 12/03/01 -0600, you wrote: >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Jorge Biquez" >To: >Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2001 10:23 PM >Subject: Load Balancing .... > > > > Hello all. > > > > I'm running FreeBSD 3.2 with apache without problems. I decided to >have 2 > > machines running my sites and use load balancing on my radios. It is > > working very good. Actually I FTP all the new information on both >servers > > when I need to make changes. > > > > I'm not a FreeBSD expert but learning and I was wondering if you >could give > > me your advice on how to have both machines updated identical the > > best way. > > > > By the way. Those machines do not have any other users but me so >security > > and permissions for other users is not important. > > > > Thanks in advance for all your comments. If you feel like answer me > > privately, this is my email: jbiquez@icsmx.com > > > > JB > > > > > >Personally I would just put the information on one machine, and then >mount it to the other via NFS. > >Josh Hello. I thought about it but a friend with more experience told me that with that I would create a problem on the response time since the response time of publishing the information directly from his own disk will be faster that publishing the information and transmit it first before publications through the LAN and network card.... Jb To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 12:55:48 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from relay.ioffe.rssi.ru (relay.ioffe.rssi.ru [194.85.224.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E692837B71A for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 12:55:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kopts@astro.ioffe.rssi.ru) Received: from astro.ioffe.rssi.ru (astro.ioffe.rssi.ru [194.85.229.130]) by relay.ioffe.rssi.ru (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA09028 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 23:55:43 +0300 (MSK) Received: by astro.ioffe.rssi.ru (8.9.3/Clnt-2.14-AS-eef) id XAA00361; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 23:55:42 +0300 (MSK) Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 23:55:42 +0300 (MSK) From: Alexey Koptsevich To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: recover of failed vinum partition Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, I would be extremely grateful for help! I have simple vinum concat partition of two drives of different sizes, but they reside on identical drives. One (the first) drive has crashed and it is completely unavailable for the moment. Unfortunately I have made an error when tried to revive partition and at the moment I have this failed drive replaced by another vinum partition in the vinum configuration. This partition has different size than the original (failed) one. Is there a way to restore the part of the disc which resides on the drive which has not crashed? I.e., is there a way to recreate the old vinum configuration somehow and then carry out correct revival procedure? I know parameters of the drive, they are identical to those which has not failed. Thank you very much! Your help is greatly appreciated! Alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 13: 6:50 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from cx587235-a.chnd1.az.home.com (cx587235-a.chnd1.az.home.com [24.11.88.170]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4498F37B719; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 13:06:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jjreynold@home.com) Received: from whale.home-net (whale [192.168.1.2]) by cx587235-a.chnd1.az.home.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f2BL6g542465; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 14:06:42 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from jjreynold@home.com) Received: (from jjreynold@localhost) by whale.home-net (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f2BL6ft86159; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 14:06:41 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from jjreynold@home.com) From: John Reynolds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15019.59617.639517.30329@whale.home-net> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 14:06:41 -0700 To: hardware@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Archived answer - Which SanDisk Imagemate's are supported under FreeBSD? X-Mailer: VM 6.88 under Emacs 20.7.1 Cc: Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG The following is a message from the usb-bsd mailing list. It answers which model of the SanDisk Imagemate USB CF card reader is supported under the current stable USB stack (as of FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE, Sun Mar 11 14:05:09 MST 2001). This info is subject to change in the future, but for right now, if you buy one of these make sure it's the SDDR-31 model or you'll be hocking it on ebay pretty quickly! This message was sent for archival purposes so others could find the information via the search engine in the future. -Jr ------- start of forwarded message ------- From: Christopher Masto Subject: Re: Which SanDisk Imagemate's are supported under FreeBSD? To: John Reynolds , usb-bsd@eleetbsd.org Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2001 19:29:01 -0500 On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 01:52:38PM -0700, John Reynolds wrote: > Is there a way I can tell exactly which one of these beasts I have? The > documentation papers inside say it is "Version 1.2." Please cc: > replies. Thanks! The one that works is model SDDR-31. It is a solid piece of molded plastic, rather flat and triangular in shape. The sticker on the bottom says "SanDisk Part No. SDDR-31". It comes in a blister pack, not a box, and seems to retail for about $30. http://www.sandisk.com/download/photos/CF.ImageMate.jpg In this picture, it is the one in the middle: http://www.sandisk.com/download/photos/reprfa.jpg -- Christopher Masto Senior Network Monkey NetMonger Communications chris@netmonger.net info@netmonger.net http://www.netmonger.net Free yourself, free your machine, free the daemon -- http://www.freebsd.org/ ------- end of forwarded message ------- -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= John Reynolds Chandler Capabilities Engineering, CDS, Intel Corporation jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com My opinions are mine, not Intel's. Running jjreynold@home.com FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE. FreeBSD: The Power to Serve. http://www.reynoldsnet.org/ Come join us!!! @ http://www.FreeBSD.org/ =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 13: 8:11 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from itouch.co.nz (itouch.co.nz [203.99.66.188]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B60CA37B719 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 13:08:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jonc@itouch.co.nz) Received: (from jonc@localhost) by itouch.co.nz (8.11.2/8.11.1) id f2BL71r23148; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 10:07:01 +1300 (NZDT) (envelope-from jonc) Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 10:07:01 +1300 From: Jonathan Chen To: Alexey Dokuchaev Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Compiling mozilla from ports -> stops with weird Bus Error message Message-ID: <20010312100701.A22602@itouchnz.itouch> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from danfe@inet.ssc.nsu.ru on Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 09:21:53PM +0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 09:21:53PM +0600, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > Hello! > > My problem is rather easy to describe: mozilla won't compile on ny box. > While everything else does. make all simply dies with Bus Error message > after 4 hours of compiling things, and that's frustrates me. Mine takes some time as well, but it went thru' ok on a P-233, 64Mb RAM. (on a recently cvsup'd /usr/ports). You'll have to include the weird bus-error for the list to make a better guess. -- Jonathan Chen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- char *p="char *p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);} To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 13:13:21 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from bugs.elitsat.net (bugs.elitsat.net [209.239.78.230]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DC0637B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 13:13:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from amour@bugs.elitsat.net) Received: from localhost (amour@localhost) by bugs.elitsat.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2BLD9o00566 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 23:13:10 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from amour@bugs.elitsat.net) Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 23:13:07 +0200 (EET) From: Alexander To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: IKE daemon (racoon) Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Is there a better IKE daemon than racoon ? And if there is or there isn't please give me url with HOWTO To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 13:32: 3 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from itouch.co.nz (itouch.co.nz [203.99.66.188]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78BAD37B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 13:31:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jonc@itouch.co.nz) Received: (from jonc@localhost) by itouch.co.nz (8.11.2/8.11.1) id f2BLV3S24582; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 10:31:03 +1300 (NZDT) (envelope-from jonc) Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 10:31:03 +1300 From: Jonathan Chen To: Eric Schmidt Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Error: Can't open /dev/dsp! (w/mpg123) Message-ID: <20010312103103.B22602@itouchnz.itouch> References: <20010310232224.A23845@enteract.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010310232224.A23845@enteract.com>; from eschmidt@enteract.com on Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 11:22:24PM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 11:22:24PM -0600, Eric Schmidt wrote: > Does anyone know how to fix this? I get this error message everytime I try to play an mp3 with mpg123. I have a Soundblaster isa card and configured my kernel the way 'man pcm' suggested. Please help! :) > > Lines for soundcard in kernel: > device pcm > device pcm0 at isa? port? irq 5 drq 1 flags 0x15 > > output from 'dmesg | grep pcm' > pcm1: on sbc0 # cd /dev # ./MAKEDEV snd0 -- Jonathan Chen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "I don't want to achive immortality through my works.. I want to achieve it through not dying" - Woody Allen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 13:43:48 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from freesurfmail.sunrise.ch (freesurfmta01.sunrise.ch [194.230.0.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06FB237B750 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 13:43:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gabism@freesurf.ch) Received: from freesurf.ch (194.230.235.57) by freesurfmail.sunrise.ch (5.1.056) id 3A7999D000284227 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:43:37 +0100 Message-ID: <3AAC0B11.6B8DD104@freesurf.ch> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 00:32:33 +0100 From: gabism@freesurf.ch X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: FreeBSD on laptop Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello! Did anyone had any problem installing/running FreeBSD 4.2 on a laptop Compaq 1240 with 64 Mb RAM and a video card Neomagic 2Mb? Thanks a lot! Jack To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 14: 3:32 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from smtp-server1.tampabay.rr.com (smtp-server1.tampabay.rr.com [65.32.1.34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 959D437B71A for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 14:03:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from meconlen@obfuscated.net) Received: from clarity (24129168hfc216.tampabay.rr.com [24.129.168.216]) by smtp-server1.tampabay.rr.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with SMTP id f2BLFd016768; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 16:15:39 -0500 (EST) From: "Michael Conlen" To: "Brad Watts" , "BSD" Subject: RE: snmpd Error Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 16:10:04 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG The MIB's are usually found under /usr/local/share/snmp/mibs. There are options you can specify to tell snmp where to find them if they are somewhere else. Presuming your using net-snmp (ucd-snmp) the man pages for snmpd and snmpcmd are very good detailing all you need to know. -- Groove On Dude Michael Conlen Obfuscated Networking meconlen@obfuscated.net > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Brad Watts > Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2001 2:23 PM > To: BSD > Subject: snmpd Error > > > I getting the following errors when attempting to launch my snmp daemon > (below), which I downloaded from the ports. Do I need to manually > enable the > Management Information Bases, as it's not able to find them? Is there > documentation on this? > > home# /usr/local/sbin/snmpd > home# Cannot find module (IP-MIB): At line 0 in (none) > Cannot find module (IF-MIB): At line 0 in (none) > Cannot find module (TCP-MIB): At line 0 in (none) > Cannot find module (UDP-MIB): At line 0 in (none) > Cannot find module (SNMPv2-MIB): At line 0 in (none) > Cannot find module (SNMPv2-SMI): At line 0 in (none) > Cannot find module (UCD-SNMP-MIB): At line 0 in (none) > Cannot find module (UCD-DEMO-MIB): At line 0 in (none) > Cannot find module (IPV6-ICMP-MIB): At line 0 in (none) > Cannot find module (IPV6-MIB): At line 0 in (none) > Cannot find module (IPV6-TCP-MIB): At line 0 in (none) > Cannot find module (IPV6-UDP-MIB): At line 0 in (none) > Cannot find module (SNMP-VIEW-BASED-ACM-MIB): At line 0 in (none) > Cannot find module (SNMP-COMMUNITY-MIB): At line 0 in (none) > Cannot find module (SNMP-FRAMEWORK-MIB): At line 0 in (none) > Cannot find module (SNMP-MPD-MIB): At line 0 in (none) > Cannot find module (SNMP-USER-BASED-SM-MIB): At line 0 in (none) > > Thanks, > Brad > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 14:14:57 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from guru.mired.org (okc-65-26-235-186.mmcable.com [65.26.235.186]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 365EA37B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 14:14:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mwm@mired.org) Received: (qmail 66336 invoked by uid 100); 11 Mar 2001 22:14:51 -0000 From: Mike Meyer MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15019.63707.84344.642380@guru.mired.org> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 16:14:51 -0600 To: Greg Lehey Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: best x11 mua ? In-Reply-To: <69374208@toto.iv> X-Mailer: VM 6.89 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid X-face: "5Mnwy%?j>IIV\)A=):rjWL~NB2aH[}Yq8Z=u~vJ`"(,&SiLvbbz2W`;h9L,Yg`+vb1>RG% *h+%X^n0EZd>TM8_IB;a8F?(Fb"lw'IgCoyM.[Lg#r\ Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Greg Lehey types: > [Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html] > >> i search a very good mua for freebsd (X11), i like outlook express under > >> win2K, and i want an equivalent under freebsd + X11; i know postilion, but > >> is there another (stable, beautifull, filters, multiple pop3/smtp, etc > >> ...). I have tried spruce but it crashed (core dump), balsa need gnome, > >> etc... kmail perhaps ? but i have heard that there was problem with kde 2.1 > > Kiltdown found the lines too long and wrapped like this: [removed] > I assert that it should have done it like this: > >>> i search a very good mua for freebsd (X11), i like outlook express > >>> under win2K, and i want an equivalent under freebsd + X11; i know > >>> postilion, but is there another (stable, beautifull, filters, > >>> multiple pop3/smtp, etc ...). I have tried spruce but it crashed > >>> (core dump), balsa need gnome, etc... kmail perhaps ? but i have > >>> heard that there was problem with kde 2.1 Ok, I've got a question about that one. It would seem that the prohibition about mailers automatically wrapping text should apply to quoted text as well, for much the same reason - you could potentially lose information in the process. Here, you seem to be implying that kiltdown ("it") should have done just that. Is that really the case? Thanx, ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 14:17:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from DougB@FreeBSD.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (Studded@master [10.0.0.2]) by dt051n37.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA90406; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 14:17:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from DougB@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <3AABF96D.CF9523F4@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 14:17:17 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Forrest Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Any luck with BIND 9? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Forrest wrote: > > When installing the BIND 9 port, do you have to deinstall the BIND 8 port? > The announcement for BIND 9 says that certain programs still require > libraries contained within 8. Those libraries are already built into the freebsd system. Before running bind 9 you should delete any bind 8 ports you have installed. > Any of you out there successfully running BIND 9 on a 4.2-STABLE or 4.3-BETA > system? What procedure did you go through when enabling BIND 9? You should read the documentation that comes with bind 9, especially the migration guide and the ARM. Also, make sure that you install 9.1.1rc4, which our port was recently updated to. Other than being stricter about syntax in your zone files, bind 9 is not _that_ much different than bind 8 for simple installations, but it pays to read up on things ahead of time. Good luck, Doug -- Perhaps the greatest damage the American system of education has done to its children is to teach them that their opinions are relevant simply because they are their opinions. Do YOU Yahoo!? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 14:19: 7 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from cliff.mfn.org (cliff.mfn.org [204.238.179.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0A9337B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 14:19:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from measl@mfn.org) Received: from greeves.mfn.org (greeves.mfn.org [204.238.179.3]) by cliff.mfn.org (8.11.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f2BMIpM60141 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 16:18:51 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from measl@mfn.org) Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 16:18:51 -0600 (CST) From: "J.A. Terranson" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Unable to boot/mount root to fixit. Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Greetings, I know *what* I did, and I knew I shouldn't have done it from prior experience, but, being 1/2 asleep... cd / chflags -R schg * I am no longer able to boot this box: it hangs when trying to mount /dev/ad0s1e. Even worse, I am unable to mount from the fixit to try and undo my mistake. I get an invalid super block error when trying to: mount /dev/ad0s1 /mnt or mount /dev/ad0s2 /mnt, etc... I am in the process o rebuilding the box in question, as I don't have time to play with it, but I am curious if anyone knows (1) why chflaging from the root breaks everything, and (2) any way I could have recovered from this? Thanks! -- Yours, J.A. Terranson sysadmin@mfn.org If Governments really want us to behave like civilized human beings, they should give serious consideration towards setting a better example: Ruling by force, rather than consensus; the unrestrained application of unjust laws (which the victim-populations were never allowed input on in the first place); the State policy of justice only for the rich and elected; the intentional abuse and occassionally destruction of entire populations merely to distract an already apathetic and numb electorate... This type of demogoguery must surely wipe out the fascist United States as surely as it wiped out the fascist Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. The views expressed here are mine, and NOT those of my employers, associates, or others. Besides, if it *were* the opinion of all of those people, I doubt there would be a problem to bitch about in the first place... -------------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 14:36:57 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from guru.mired.org (okc-65-26-235-186.mmcable.com [65.26.235.186]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A800337B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 14:36:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mwm@mired.org) Received: (qmail 18621 invoked by uid 100); 11 Mar 2001 22:36:52 -0000 From: Mike Meyer MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15019.65028.743053.640046@guru.mired.org> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 16:36:52 -0600 To: "Charles Burns" Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw rules for incoming passive mode ftp connections In-Reply-To: <10931933@toto.iv> X-Mailer: VM 6.89 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid X-face: "5Mnwy%?j>IIV\)A=):rjWL~NB2aH[}Yq8Z=u~vJ`"(,&SiLvbbz2W`;h9L,Yg`+vb1>RG% *h+%X^n0EZd>TM8_IB;a8F?(Fb"lw'IgCoyM.[Lg#r\ Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Charles Burns types: > This was somewhat covered a few days ago. Mike Meyer pointed out that the > documentation for ftpd is incorrect. If you allow ports 1024-4999 (the "old > behavior") PASV FTP should work. Sortof. It seems rather flaky to me with a > firewall enabled, actually, but I probably just need to refine my rules. > > It was suggested that the option -DIP_PORTRANGE was needed to enable the > behavior that is supposed to be default. This may work for you, but did not > work for me for some reason. When I tried defining this option in the source > code, GCC complained that it was already defined in a file that is > completely external to FTPD (but is included). The file that's included is part of the system ip setup, and ftpd checks for that define to verify that it the definitions it's using to get the port numbers are right. That part of the code is fine, and I goofed in not checking for IP_PORTRANGE to be defined outside the program. Beyond that, I can't understand why it doesn't work as advertised. You might try running ftpd with -U to see if you get the high range. http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/ Independent WWW/Perforce/FreeBSD/Unix consultant, email for more information. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 14:40:25 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from akira.lanfear.com (akira.lanfear.com [208.12.11.174]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D55037B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 14:40:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mwlist@lanfear.com) Received: from sapporo.lanfear.com (h-64-105-36-216.snvacaid.covad.net [64.105.36.216]) by akira.lanfear.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA82628; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 14:40:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mwlist@lanfear.com) Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 14:40:06 -0800 (PST) From: Marc W Message-Id: <200103112240.OAA82628@akira.lanfear.com> To: Mike Meyer , Greg Lehey Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: best x11 mua ? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Mailer: Kiltdown 0.7 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > ----------------------------- > From: Mike Meyer > To: Greg Lehey > Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG > {snip} > > Ok, I've got a question about that one. It would seem that the > prohibition about mailers automatically wrapping text should apply to > quoted text as well, for much the same reason - you could potentially > lose information in the process. > > Here, you seem to be implying that kiltdown ("it") should have done > just that. Is that really the case? There definitely is a problem with assuming the text is flowed, and that is when the user has formatted the text using spaces and the like. by telling the formatter to just go and force a flowed-text style, you definitely could cause some ugliness here, but would solve the 80% case where text is just flowed ... mailers like outlook express try to get around this by just limiting text lines to 72 characters, so that you can theoretically reply to a couple of messages without ugly wrapping (assuming everybody uses oe). unfortunately, not many other mailers do this. there seems to be pretty inconsistent use of the Content-Type keyword format='flowed', which would definitely help here some too. i think the answer is to just let the user decide -- give them a checkbox they can flip between or something like that ... blech. marc. Marc W, San Francisco, CA Kiltdown -- a free email client for X www.kiltdown.org -- it's what's underneath that counts. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 14:54:18 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from guru.mired.org (okc-65-26-235-186.mmcable.com [65.26.235.186]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E8BDD37B719 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 14:54:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mwm@mired.org) Received: (qmail 33686 invoked by uid 100); 11 Mar 2001 22:54:13 -0000 From: Mike Meyer MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15020.533.797648.298021@guru.mired.org> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 16:54:13 -0600 To: Jorge Biquez Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Load Balancing .... In-Reply-To: <95724151@toto.iv> X-Mailer: VM 6.89 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid X-face: "5Mnwy%?j>IIV\)A=):rjWL~NB2aH[}Yq8Z=u~vJ`"(,&SiLvbbz2W`;h9L,Yg`+vb1>RG% *h+%X^n0EZd>TM8_IB;a8F?(Fb"lw'IgCoyM.[Lg#r\ Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Jorge Biquez types: > I'm running FreeBSD 3.2 with apache without problems. I decided to have 2 > machines running my sites and use load balancing on my radios. It is > working very good. Actually I FTP all the new information on both servers > when I need to make changes. > > I'm not a FreeBSD expert but learning and I was wondering if you could give > me your advice on how to have both machines updated identical the > best way. The best way to do this is make the process of copying to *both* systems an automatic part of distribution system. A crude mechanism would be to set up an "install" shell script on the test server that arranged to copy things to both servers. That's a bit error-prone though. What I do for my clients is to integrate things into the source control system. There are two branches in that system - test and production. The systems running servers have a script that updates the server to the appropriate branch once a minute. This requires a source control system that can do that efficiently - particularly in the case where there have been no changes made. If your site search engine can delete from and add individual pages to the index, then you can have the same scripts parse the udpate report and tweak the index, thus keeping the search engines index in sync with the two servers. http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/ Independent WWW/Perforce/FreeBSD/Unix consultant, email for more information. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 14:57:44 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1out.umbc.edu (mx1out.umbc.edu [130.85.253.51]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22EDE37B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 14:57:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gmiddl1@gl.umbc.edu) Received: from linux3.gl.umbc.edu (IDENT:gmiddl1@linux3.gl.umbc.edu [130.85.60.39]) by mx1out.umbc.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA07680 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 17:57:39 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 17:57:39 -0500 (EST) From: "G. Jason Middleton" To: Subject: ARP!! Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG arp: 00:48:54:8b:5f:88 is using my IP address 65.9.249.190 i get this in my dmesg...but i can still talk to the outside world here is my dmesg...what shall i do? Copyright (c) 1992-2000 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE #0: Thu Mar 1 16:34:08 EST 2001 root@cc502667-a.catv1.md.home.com:/usr/src/sys/compile/BSDBOX Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz CPU: Pentium/P54C (132.96-MHz 586-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x52c Stepping = 12 Features=0x1bf real memory = 50331648 (49152K bytes) avail memory = 45740032 (44668K bytes) Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc034f000. Intel Pentium detected, installing workaround for F00F bug md0: Malloc disk npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pcib0: on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0xfff0-0xffff at device 7.1 on pci0 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 de0: port 0xf680-0xf6ff mem 0xffeefb80-0xffeefbff irq 9 at device 8.0 on pci0 de0: 21140A [10-100Mb/s] pass 2.0 de0: address 00:40:05:31:96:2b dc0: port 0xf700-0xf7ff mem 0xffeefc00-0xffeeffff irq 10 at device 9.0 on pci0 dc0: Ethernet address: 00:03:6d:17:b4:98 miibus0: on dc0 ukphy0: on miibus0 ukphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto pci0: at 10.0 irq 11 fdc0: at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa0 fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 atkbd0: flags 0x1 irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> ppc0: at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0 ppc0: Generic chipset (NIBBLE-only) in COMPATIBLE mode plip0: on ppbus0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus0 IP packet filtering initialized, divert enabled, rule-based forwarding disabled, default to accept, logging disabled ad0: 8063MB [16383/16/63] at ata0-master WDMA2 Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a arp: 00:48:54:8b:5f:88 is using my IP address 65.9.249.190! thanks in advance G. Jason Middleton _______________________________________________________________________________ Announcement: The revolution will not be televised. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 15: 0: 1 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from rmx420-mta.mail.com (rmx420-mta.mail.com [165.251.48.152]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B549837B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 14:59:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andyakins@earthlink.net) Received: from web623-wrb.mail.com (web623-wrb.mail.com [165.251.33.63]) by rmx420-mta.mail.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id RAA04194 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 17:59:51 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <380547804.984351591312.JavaMail.root@web623-wrb.mail.com> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 17:59:51 -0500 (EST) From: Andy Akins To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Startup messages question Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: mail.com X-Originating-IP: 209.86.48.152 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'll start this out by syaing that I am a freebsd newbie. I'm running the 4.2 FreeBSD that I purchased in the FreeBSD Toolkit. I have cvsup'ed my source tree following the STABLE branch, and rebuilt my kernel with parameters appropriate to my hardware. Everything runs fine. Ever since I rebuilt and installed my custom kernal, I get some config> errors at the beginning talking about missing devices. Obviously these are devices that GENERIC had that my new one does not - how do I get the boot process to stop loading these non-existant drivers? Also - the boot process spends a lot of time timing out on the ata master/slaves - because I have nothing hooked up to then (except one dvd on ata0 master.). Below is a cat from dmesg. If anyone can help me out, or point me to the right docs (I can't find anything about this in Lehey's book). I'd appreciate it. Thanks! Andy Akins andyakins@earthlink.net ============================================================= Copyright (c) 1992-2001 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 4.3-BETA #1: Sun Mar 11 11:29:29 CST 2001 root@:/usr/src/sys/compile/SULIEMAN Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz Timecounter "TSC" frequency 958541125 Hz CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) Processor (958.54-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x642 Stepping = 2 Features=0x183f9ff AMD Features=0xc0440000<,AMIE,DSP,3DNow!> real memory = 268353536 (262064K bytes) config> di sn0 No such device: sn0 Invalid command or syntax. Type `?' for help. config> di lnc0 No such device: lnc0 Invalid command or syntax. Type `?' for help. config> di ie0 No such device: ie0 Invalid command or syntax. Type `?' for help. config> di fe0 No such device: fe0 Invalid command or syntax. Type `?' for help. config> di ed0 No such device: ed0 Invalid command or syntax. Type `?' for help. config> di cs0 No such device: cs0 Invalid command or syntax. Type `?' for help. config> en pcic0 No such device: pcic0 Invalid command or syntax. Type `?' for help. config> po pcic0 0x3e0 No such device: pcic0 Invalid command or syntax. Type `?' for help. config> ir pcic0 0 No such device: pcic0 Invalid command or syntax. Type `?' for help. config> iom pcic0 0xd0000 No such device: pcic0 Invalid command or syntax. Type `?' for help. config> f pcic0 0 No such device: pcic0 Invalid command or syntax. Type `?' for help. config> q avail memory = 257896448 (251852K bytes) Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc034e000. Preloaded userconfig_script "/boot/kernel.conf" at 0xc034e09c. Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled md0: Malloc disk npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pcib0: on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 pcib2: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib2 pci1: at 0.0 irq 11 isab0: at device 4.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0xb800-0xb80f at device 4.1 on pci0 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 uhci0: port 0xb400-0xb41f irq 9 at device 4.2 on pci0 usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci1: port 0xb000-0xb01f irq 9 at device 4.3 on pci0 usb1: on uhci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhub2: ALCOR Generic USB Hub, class 9/0, rev 1.10/1.00, addr 2 uhub2: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered ahc0: port 0x9400-0x94ff mem 0xd6800000-0xd6800fff irq 9 at device 9.0 on pci0 aic7890/91: Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 32/255 SCBs pci0: (vendor=0x1105, dev=0x8300) at 10.0 irq 5 pcm0: port 0x9000-0x901f irq 9 at device 13.0 on pci0 atapci1: port 0x7000-0x703f,0x7400-0x7403,0x7800-0x7807,0x8000-0x8003,0x8400-0x8407 mem 0xd5800000-0xd581ffff irq 10 at device 17.0 on pci0 ata2: at 0x8400 on atapci1 ata3: at 0x7800 on atapci1 pcib1: on motherboard pci2: on pcib1 fdc0: at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa0 fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 atkbd0: flags 0x1 irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: model IntelliMouse Explorer, device ID 4 vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 sio0: type 16550A sio1 at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa0 sio1: type 16550A ppc0: at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0 ppc0: SMC-like chipset (ECP/EPP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/8 bytes threshold ppbus0: IEEE1284 device found /NIBBLE/ECP Probing for PnP devices on ppbus0: ppbus0: SCP,VLINK lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus0 ata1-slave: ata_command: timeout waiting for intr ata1-slave: identify failed ata2-slave: ata_command: timeout waiting for intr ata2-slave: identify failed ata2-master: ata_command: timeout waiting for intr ata2-master: identify failed ata3-slave: ata_command: timeout waiting for intr ata3-slave: identify failed ata3-master: ata_command: timeout waiting for intr ata3-master: identify failed acd0: DVD-ROM at ata0-master using UDMA33 Waiting 5 seconds for SCSI devices to settle Mounting root from ufs:/dev/da0s2a da0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da0: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 15, 16bit) da0: 47702MB (97693755 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 6081C) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 15: 1: 0 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from guru.mired.org (okc-65-26-235-186.mmcable.com [65.26.235.186]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 07DDD37B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 15:00:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mwm@mired.org) Received: (qmail 49071 invoked by uid 100); 11 Mar 2001 23:00:57 -0000 From: Mike Meyer MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15020.937.223337.686448@guru.mired.org> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 17:00:57 -0600 To: Marc W Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: best x11 mua ? In-Reply-To: <200103112240.OAA82628@akira.lanfear.com> References: <200103112240.OAA82628@akira.lanfear.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.89 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid X-face: "5Mnwy%?j>IIV\)A=):rjWL~NB2aH[}Yq8Z=u~vJ`"(,&SiLvbbz2W`;h9L,Yg`+vb1>RG% *h+%X^n0EZd>TM8_IB;a8F?(Fb"lw'IgCoyM.[Lg#r\ Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Marc W types: > there seems to be pretty inconsistent use of the Content-Type > keyword format='flowed', which would definitely help here some too. Is there an RFC for that somewhere? Of course, since it doesn't seem to apply except in MIME, which brings a lot more to the table. Unfortunately, the FreeBSD mail digester just blindly forwards MIME mail, without the MIME headers (among other things). > i think the answer is to just let the user decide -- give them a > checkbox they can flip between or something like that ... blech. That works for quoted text - but it depends on the text, so you might as well make it a command. For unquoted text, the two ends have to agree. Without some mechanism for communicating the choice, that doesn't seem likely. http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/ Independent WWW/Perforce/FreeBSD/Unix consultant, email for more information. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 15: 6: 0 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-158.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.158]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 659D637B71D for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 15:05:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C2C0666F14; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 15:05:55 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 15:05:55 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Duraid Cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: Re: ssh error Message-ID: <20010311150555.A68661@mollari.cthul.hu> References: <3AABA583.30ECACE@home.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ibTvN161/egqYuK8" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3AABA583.30ECACE@home.com>; from latif2221@home.com on Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 11:19:15AM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --ibTvN161/egqYuK8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 11:19:15AM -0500, Duraid wrote: > every time i remotly login to my sshd i get a message saying that the > server id has changed and maybe that someone is evesdroping. is that > some thing to do with my public id? but when ssh from the local machine > where the server is everything is ok. It doesn't say someone IS eavesdropping, it says they COULD be. The server is announcing itself with a different key to what your local account thinks it should have: either you aren't connecting to the right system (this is the eavesdropping warning - someone could be hijacking your connection to redirect it to their own system: this isn't likely, but it's possible) or an admin changed the key on the server and everything is okay but you just need to get a copy of the new key. You need to verify a copy of the host key on the server (e.g. log into the console directly, not over SSH, or talk to an admin) and update the host key on your local account in ~/.ssh/known_hosts Kris --ibTvN161/egqYuK8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6rATTWry0BWjoQKURAp4DAKDnsqtD86O1jtgMrm1iVz++ppjbvACfcmru W4lsgDJGFmL+QdQ/FhgpZd8= =Cy9l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ibTvN161/egqYuK8-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 15: 8:21 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-158.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.158]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15A4A37B719 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 15:08:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CEDAB66F14; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 15:08:18 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 15:08:18 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Julian Bolivar Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.3 Release... Message-ID: <20010311150818.B68661@mollari.cthul.hu> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Y7xTucakfITjPcLV" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from jbolivar@cantv.net on Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 02:29:54PM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --Y7xTucakfITjPcLV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 02:29:54PM -0400, Julian Bolivar wrote: > Hello, please the FreeBSD 4.3 Release is on time? (to March 2001), because I > preorder it and I check that I scheduled mount the server with it at the > April's first week, or I need to reschedule this project. As far as I know, the release is on time and will be available for download according to the schedule posted in several places already. However, the CD release always follows a few weeks after that, and I don't know of the schedule. If you need this release on a deadline the best bet is to download it from the network (an ISO image of the first CD will be provided as usual so you can even burn your own CD) Kris --Y7xTucakfITjPcLV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6rAViWry0BWjoQKURAgU5AKDJD8l/pPF36gSwQ7nKfXMnLzff5wCguYmo RFq2HpnwrCozACcOsdoBFWc= =8Ogh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Y7xTucakfITjPcLV-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 15: 8:37 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-158.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.158]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 689DF37B71B for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 15:08:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3220D66F15; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 15:08:34 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 15:08:34 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Alexander Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IKE daemon (racoon) Message-ID: <20010311150834.C68661@mollari.cthul.hu> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="w7PDEPdKQumQfZlR" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from amour@bugs.elitsat.net on Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 11:13:07PM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --w7PDEPdKQumQfZlR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 11:13:07PM +0200, Alexander wrote: > Is there a better IKE daemon than racoon ? > And if there is or there isn't please give me url > with HOWTO Nope. Kris --w7PDEPdKQumQfZlR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6rAVxWry0BWjoQKURAjMeAJ9Hz8VKeAOdVWOa+OpRWodqoqePugCgwduw LYW0LKx65zlGnKraWKlB/8Y= =m6Ds -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --w7PDEPdKQumQfZlR-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 15:20:34 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from wantadilla.lemis.com (wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.80]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AE9637B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 15:20:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: by wantadilla.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 6913D6AC96; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 09:49:55 +1030 (CST) Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 09:49:55 +1030 From: Greg Lehey To: Mike Meyer Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: best x11 mua ? Message-ID: <20010312094955.W57126@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <69374208@toto.iv> <15019.63707.84344.642380@guru.mired.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <15019.63707.84344.642380@guru.mired.org>; from mwm@mired.org on Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 04:14:51PM -0600 Organization: LEMIS, PO Box 460, Echunga SA 5153, Australia Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.lemis.com/~grog X-PGP-Fingerprint: 6B 7B C3 8C 61 CD 54 AF 13 24 52 F8 6D A4 95 EF Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sunday, 11 March 2001 at 16:14:51 -0600, Mike Meyer wrote: > Greg Lehey types: >> [Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html] > >>>> i search a very good mua for freebsd (X11), i like outlook express under >>>> win2K, and i want an equivalent under freebsd + X11; i know postilion, but >>>> is there another (stable, beautifull, filters, multiple pop3/smtp, etc >>>> ...). I have tried spruce but it crashed (core dump), balsa need gnome, >>>> etc... kmail perhaps ? but i have heard that there was problem with kde 2.1 >> >> Kiltdown found the lines too long and wrapped like this: > > [removed] > >> I assert that it should have done it like this: > >>>>> i search a very good mua for freebsd (X11), i like outlook express >>>>> under win2K, and i want an equivalent under freebsd + X11; i know >>>>> postilion, but is there another (stable, beautifull, filters, >>>>> multiple pop3/smtp, etc ...). I have tried spruce but it crashed >>>>> (core dump), balsa need gnome, etc... kmail perhaps ? but i have >>>>> heard that there was problem with kde 2.1 > > Ok, I've got a question about that one. It would seem that the > prohibition about mailers automatically wrapping text should apply to > quoted text as well, for much the same reason - you could potentially > lose information in the process. > > Here, you seem to be implying that kiltdown ("it") should have done just > that. Is that really the case? Well, there are two issues. I see again and again the opposite problem, the "one line per paragraph" syndrome. That needs fixing. And imagine a message which has grown a few more quotes: > > > >>>> i search a very good mua for freebsd (X11), i like outlook express > > > >>>> under win2K, and i want an equivalent under freebsd + X11; i know > > > >>>> postilion, but is there another (stable, beautifull, filters, > > > >>>> multiple pop3/smtp, etc ...). I have tried spruce but it crashed > > > >>>> (core dump), balsa need gnome, etc... kmail perhaps ? but i have > > > >>>> heard that there was problem with kde 2.1 I can't see any reason not to "fix" that to: >>>>>>> i search a very good mua for freebsd (X11), i like outlook >>>>>>> express under win2K, and i want an equivalent under freebsd + >>>>>>> X11; i know postilion, but is there another (stable, >>>>>>> beautifull, filters, multiple pop3/smtp, etc ...). I have >>>>>>> tried spruce but it crashed (core dump), balsa need gnome, >>>>>>> etc... kmail perhaps ? but i have heard that there was problem >>>>>>> with kde 2.1 Should it be automatic? If it can always Do The Right Thing, yes. I assert that it's impossible to always Do The Right Thing. Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. If you don't, I may ignore the reply. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 15:23: 8 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from tierzero.apana.org.au (apana.internode.on.net [150.101.94.101]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E62BF37B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 15:23:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bastill@sa.apana.org.au) Received: from PhD_1.testname.com.au (bra@dialup-4.pasa.apana.org.au [203.14.158.133]) by tierzero.apana.org.au (8.8.8/8.7.3) with SMTP id JAA23217; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 09:52:57 +1030 (CST) From: Brian Astill Reply-To: bastill@sa.apana.org.au To: JBOGGEY1@aol.com, questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Acroread Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 09:47:47 +1030 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.29] Content-Type: text/plain References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01031209530400.02317@PhD_1.testname.com.au> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, JBOGGEY1@aol.com wrote: > I am trying to delete files from my hard drive and I keep getting windows > asking which reader do you wish to use to look at this docuement. How do I > know the format of these documents? How do I download acroread? Who is the > creator of this software? By 'windows' I think you mean dialogs. I am just guessing that you are in X using a file manager and have left-clicked your mouse button. The system then assumes you want to run or view the file and asks you "with what". With most file managers you need to RIGHT-click over the file. This will bring up a small menu which includes "delete' as one of its options. Hope I guessed correctly, and that my message helps you. -- Regards, Brian ******************************************************** Dr Brian Astill Visiting Research Fellow Flinders University Institute of International Education Bus 8201 3480 FAX 8449 9199 bastill@sa.apana.org.au ******************************************************** To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 15:37:55 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from wantadilla.lemis.com (wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.80]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23A0737B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 15:37:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: by wantadilla.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 7FA886AC94; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 09:42:32 +1030 (CST) Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 09:42:32 +1030 From: Greg Lehey To: Alexey Koptsevich Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: recover of failed vinum partition Message-ID: <20010312094232.U57126@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from kopts@astro.ioffe.rssi.ru on Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 11:55:42PM +0300 Organization: LEMIS, PO Box 460, Echunga SA 5153, Australia Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.lemis.com/~grog X-PGP-Fingerprint: 6B 7B C3 8C 61 CD 54 AF 13 24 52 F8 6D A4 95 EF Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sunday, 11 March 2001 at 23:55:42 +0300, Alexey Koptsevich wrote: > > Hello, > > I would be extremely grateful for help! > > I have simple vinum concat partition of two drives of different sizes, but > they reside on identical drives. One (the first) drive has crashed and it > is completely unavailable for the moment. Unfortunately I have made an > error when tried to revive partition and at the moment I have this failed > drive replaced by another vinum partition in the vinum configuration. This > partition has different size than the original (failed) one. Is there a > way to restore the part of the disc which resides on the drive which has > not crashed? I.e., is there a way to recreate the old vinum configuration > somehow and then carry out correct revival procedure? I know parameters of > the drive, they are identical to those which has not failed. It would be nice to have a few details of your current situation. The output of "vinum list" would help. If you only have one plex in the volume, you're basically hosed. ufs doesn't provide for recovery of partial file systems. Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. If you don't, I may ignore the reply. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 16: 4:53 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from smtp011.mail.yahoo.com (smtp011.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.173.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4D53537B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 16:04:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from xfrog98@yahoo.com) Received: from c1333206-a.tcma1.wa.home.com (HELO alpha) (65.4.80.52) by smtp.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 Mar 2001 00:04:50 -0000 X-Apparently-From: Message-ID: <000001c0aa89$78aa1db0$34500441@alpha> Reply-To: "Bruce Dang" From: "Bruce Dang" To: Subject: Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 16:14:43 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG subscribe _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 16: 7:34 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-158.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.158]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECB4C37B718; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 16:07:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 412E866F14; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 16:07:24 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 16:07:24 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Yifeng Xu Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, ache@nagual.pp.ru, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: **HEADS UP** bug fix for pr25439 (patch) Message-ID: <20010311160724.A70656@mollari.cthul.hu> References: <20010304124849.10752.qmail@web1704.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010304124849.10752.qmail@web1704.mail.yahoo.com>; from websoft@yahoo.com on Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 04:48:49AM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Please submit this as a followup to the PR so that it is tracked in the bug DB. Kris On Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 04:48:49AM -0800, Yifeng Xu wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I am sorry it seems my SMTP server has problems, so I send it via Yahoo! > you may received my several previous sents.=20 >=20 > I think I found the bug about annoying console mouse cursor flicker > problem reported in http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D25439 > by me sometimes ago, the bug is in file=20 > /sys/dev/syscons/syscons.c where function scrn_update will hide=20 > and redraw mouse cursor in a special area: >=20 > .......................... > .......................... > .......................... > .......................... > .......................... > .......................... > ..XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > XX@....................... > .......................... >=20 > the above image represents a full image of console screen, > every line represents a line on screen, char @ represents=20 > TEXT CURSOR position, area marked with 'X' is an unsafe area,=20 > if mouse cursor is moved into this area, syscons will become=20 > weird, mouse cursor flickers in very fast speed, eats CPU time=20 > up to 20%. >=20 > the following is a patch to fix this problem. I wish=20 > the bug is fixed before FreeBSD 4.3 rolls out. this is a long > standing bug. hurray! >=20 > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >=20 > --- syscons.c.orig Sun Mar 4 16:18:59 2001 > +++ syscons.c Sun Mar 4 16:22:33 2001 > @@ -1719,12 +1719,9 @@ > /* remove the previous mouse pointer image if necessary */ > if (scp->status & MOUSE_VISIBLE) { > s =3D scp->mouse_pos; > - e =3D scp->mouse_pos + scp->xsize + 1; > + e =3D scp->mouse_pos; > if ((scp->status & (MOUSE_MOVED | MOUSE_HIDDEN)) > - || and_region(&s, &e, scp->start, scp->end) > - || ((scp->status & CURSOR_ENABLED) &&=20 > - (and_region(&s, &e, scp->cursor_pos, scp->cursor_pos) > - || and_region(&s, &e, scp->cursor_oldpos, scp->cursor_oldpos)))) { > + || and_region(&s, &e, scp->start, scp->end)) { > sc_remove_mouse_image(scp); > if (scp->end >=3D scp->xsize*scp->ysize) > scp->end =3D scp->xsize*scp->ysize - 1; >=20 > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >=20 > David Xu > davidx@viasoft.com.cn >=20 >=20 > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.=20 > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ >=20 > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message >=20 --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6rBM7Wry0BWjoQKURAmhMAJ48OJLKFlyWalEWYRllciw8f1/IrgCghfi4 83anOvKRaDn9bDxawOynDKg= =YoJb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 16:11:42 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from nagual.pp.ru (pobrecita.freebsd.ru [194.87.13.42]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A2A637B718; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 16:11:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: (from ache@localhost) by nagual.pp.ru (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f2C0BT911291; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 03:11:29 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache) Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 03:11:26 +0300 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" To: Kris Kennaway Cc: Yifeng Xu , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: **HEADS UP** bug fix for pr25439 (patch) Message-ID: <20010312031125.A10601@nagual.pp.ru> References: <20010304124849.10752.qmail@web1704.mail.yahoo.com> <20010311160724.A70656@mollari.cthul.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010311160724.A70656@mollari.cthul.hu>; from kris@obsecurity.org on Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 04:07:24PM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 16:07:24 -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Please submit this as a followup to the PR so that it is tracked in > the bug DB. It is already fixed. --=20 Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3ia iQCVAwUBOqwULeJgpPLZnQjrAQEuXwP8DMSyuU3DtpcDuD+wJV8vI0Aiw1qN04Q3 cft6dKYtRDp6afPSfcBJ0nnbkExcdabZhTurBl2Nyz9WoXuNvpGLV/6eGCAg3zp8 ihQqtKTB0fffIXra0yBWUEX31srDi8zD51xx/1wrI2F9AQCNOjU8VUMeC1nm4Dbk 4r0pIj52g1A= =OQJJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 16:13:52 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-158.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.158]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 436AD37B718; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 16:13:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F3E5D66F14; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 16:13:47 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 16:13:47 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: "Andrey A. Chernov" Cc: Kris Kennaway , Yifeng Xu , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: **HEADS UP** bug fix for pr25439 (patch) Message-ID: <20010311161347.B70656@mollari.cthul.hu> References: <20010304124849.10752.qmail@web1704.mail.yahoo.com> <20010311160724.A70656@mollari.cthul.hu> <20010312031125.A10601@nagual.pp.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tsOsTdHNUZQcU9Ye" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010312031125.A10601@nagual.pp.ru>; from ache@nagual.pp.ru on Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 03:11:26AM +0300 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --tsOsTdHNUZQcU9Ye Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 03:11:26AM +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 16:07:24 -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > Please submit this as a followup to the PR so that it is tracked in > > the bug DB. >=20 > It is already fixed. Great - so the PR can be closed? Kris --tsOsTdHNUZQcU9Ye Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6rBS7Wry0BWjoQKURAjDmAJ96x3Wk454N8KQ+Hq4oOU484QS5RwCfT9x9 DyK7P8A45xIrb3p69jIH8Mg= =T7FD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tsOsTdHNUZQcU9Ye-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 16:16:31 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from nagual.pp.ru (pobrecita.freebsd.ru [194.87.13.42]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C171A37B71B; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 16:16:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: (from ache@localhost) by nagual.pp.ru (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f2C0GCn11431; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 03:16:12 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache) Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 03:16:08 +0300 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" To: Kris Kennaway Cc: Yifeng Xu , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: **HEADS UP** bug fix for pr25439 (patch) Message-ID: <20010312031608.A11385@nagual.pp.ru> References: <20010304124849.10752.qmail@web1704.mail.yahoo.com> <20010311160724.A70656@mollari.cthul.hu> <20010312031125.A10601@nagual.pp.ru> <20010311161347.B70656@mollari.cthul.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010311161347.B70656@mollari.cthul.hu>; from kris@obsecurity.org on Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 04:13:47PM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 16:13:47 -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 03:11:26AM +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 16:07:24 -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > Please submit this as a followup to the PR so that it is tracked in > > > the bug DB. > >=20 > > It is already fixed. >=20 > Great - so the PR can be closed? Not yet - not merged into -stable (I don't have any -stable machine for testing) --=20 Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3ia iQCVAwUBOqwVSOJgpPLZnQjrAQGmogP/fnjOX6FPtBLuOxpmyDXVMMLoXnrWfwRJ SiUEclpsYhFYbX7ntIKQEWMav3XVfuoVsEuV1SncoGyHZ4/5KCbCpk5K/FrhQaMv TDxpHQda0gG4OAVskwwsXt5KrjMnGL/2PASPscXVMTCWsYhKzA4DB85neDw5Xu2V 6kHbj477gHM= =lgiv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 16:40:51 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from wantadilla.lemis.com (wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.80]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DBDD37B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 16:40:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: by wantadilla.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 4D2296AC94; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 11:10:46 +1030 (CST) Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 11:10:46 +1030 From: Greg Lehey To: Charles Burns Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: No man pages for root Message-ID: <20010312111046.B11986@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from burnscharlesn@hotmail.com on Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 10:46:23AM -0700 Organization: LEMIS, PO Box 460, Echunga SA 5153, Australia Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.lemis.com/~grog X-PGP-Fingerprint: 6B 7B C3 8C 61 CD 54 AF 13 24 52 F8 6D A4 95 EF Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sunday, 11 March 2001 at 10:46:23 -0700, Charles Burns wrote: > Hello FreeBSD people, > For no apparent reason, root can no longer use man pages on my FreeBSD > machine. Normal users, however, can use man pages just fine. > Whenever any man command is given in root, root gets the message "No manual > entry for foo." > The last thing that I did was modify some of the files in /usr/share/skel, > but I fail to see what that has to do with anything. I may have unwittingly > done something else that I cannot remember, though. > Note that "manpath" returns the exact same value for both root and normal > users, which is the default manpath. > > Does anybody have any ideas as to how this might be remedied? What does "echo $MANPATH" say? Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. If you don't, I may ignore the reply. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 16:46:55 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from matt.MUNICH.v-net.org (u57n248.syd.eastlink.ca [24.222.57.248]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D85637B719 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 16:46:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from matt@cape-breton-island.com) Received: from localhost (matt@localhost) by matt.MUNICH.v-net.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA38869 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 20:46:38 -0400 (AST) (envelope-from matt@cape-breton-island.com) Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 20:46:38 -0400 (AST) From: Matthew Rudderham X-Sender: matt@matt.MUNICH.v-net.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Apache -- Cannot find mod_env.c Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, After upgrading my Apache from 1.3.12 to 1.3.19 after building when apachectl start is run the following is returned: Syntax error on line 227 of /usr/local/etc/apache/httpd.conf: Cannot add module via name 'mod_env.c': not in list of loaded modules /usr/local/sbin/apachectl start: httpd could not be started After searching the list archives I found a solution which recommended either commenting out the lines, which could cause problems for CGI? or rebuilding the modules with the following: ./configure --enable-module=all --enable-shared=max This didn't seem to have any effect for me. Does anyone else have any insight they could lend me? Thanks, - Matthew Rudderham To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 16:49:49 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from sudz.ns3g.com (cr618871-b.bloor1.on.wave.home.com [24.43.110.112]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D500937B718; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 16:49:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sudz@ns3g.com) Received: from cooler (cr618871-a.bloor1.on.wave.home.com [24.43.110.110]) by sudz.ns3g.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with SMTP id f2C0oXM01908; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 19:50:34 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from sudz@ns3g.com) Reply-To: From: "Colin Legendre" To: , Subject: KDE2 Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 19:52:57 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_008C_01C0AA64.DEC926B0" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_008C_01C0AA64.DEC926B0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I am having an issue with KDE2 that I am wondering if anyone else has noticed. When I rearange the icons and the logout when I log back in the icons are back in the original locations. Everything else such as background and newly created icons are there and saved but there locations will not save. any help ! Colin Legendre CCNA, MCP sudz@ns3g.com ------=_NextPart_000_008C_01C0AA64.DEC926B0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I am = having an issue=20 with KDE2 that I am wondering if anyone else has = noticed.
 
When I = rearange the=20 icons and the logout when  I log back in the icons are back in the = original=20 locations.  Everything else such as background and newly created = icons are=20 there and saved but there locations will not save.
 
 
any = help=20 !
 
 
 
Colin Legendre  CCNA, = MCP
sudz@ns3g.com
 
------=_NextPart_000_008C_01C0AA64.DEC926B0-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 16:52: 4 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mailhost01.reflexnet.net (mailhost01.reflexnet.net [64.6.192.82]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA87D37B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 16:52:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cjc@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflexcom.com) Received: from rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflexcom.com ([216.196.73.168]) by mailhost01.reflexnet.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.197.19); Sun, 11 Mar 2001 16:49:58 -0800 Received: (from cjc@localhost) by rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflexcom.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f2C0q3e92040; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 16:52:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cjc) Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 16:51:57 -0800 From: "Crist J. Clark" To: Andy Akins Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Startup messages question Message-ID: <20010311165157.I50418@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflex> Reply-To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu References: <380547804.984351591312.JavaMail.root@web623-wrb.mail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <380547804.984351591312.JavaMail.root@web623-wrb.mail.com>; from andyakins@earthlink.net on Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 05:59:51PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 05:59:51PM -0500, Andy Akins wrote: > I'll start this out by syaing that I am a freebsd newbie. > > I'm running the 4.2 FreeBSD that I purchased in the FreeBSD Toolkit. I have cvsup'ed my source tree following the STABLE branch, and rebuilt my kernel with parameters appropriate to my hardware. Everything runs fine. > > Ever since I rebuilt and installed my custom kernal, I get some config> errors at the beginning talking about missing devices. Obviously these are devices that GENERIC had that my new one does not - how do I get the boot process to stop loading these non-existant drivers? It's not trying to load them, it's trying to disable them. You have a old kernel.conf laying around in /boot (see below). The best thing to do is edit /boot/loader.conf so it does not try to load it. > Also - the boot process spends a lot of time timing out on the ata master/slaves - because I have nothing hooked up to then (except one dvd on ata0 master.). *shrug* I reboot once every few months. A few seconds has never bothered me enough to try to tune the boot speed. No ideas. Those errors you get though... they don't look right. [snip] > Preloaded userconfig_script "/boot/kernel.conf" at 0xc034e09c. Says right there where the kernel.conf is. -- Crist J. Clark cjclark@alum.mit.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 16:54:27 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from karon.dynas.se (karon.dynas.se [192.71.43.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E02037B719 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 16:54:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mikko@dynas.se) Received: (qmail 64838 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2001 00:54:22 -0000 Received: from spirit.sto.dynas.se (HELO spirit.dynas.se) (172.16.1.10) by 172.16.1.1 with SMTP; 12 Mar 2001 00:54:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 1143 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2001 00:54:19 -0000 Received: from explorer.rsa.com (10.81.217.59) by spirit.dynas.se with SMTP; 12 Mar 2001 00:54:19 -0000 Received: (from mikko@localhost) by explorer.rsa.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f2C0sJX21569; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 16:54:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mikko) Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 16:54:19 -0800 (PST) From: Mikko Tyolajarvi Message-Id: <200103120054.f2C0sJX21569@explorer.rsa.com> To: l8tr2000@yahoo.com Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bzflag port I just made. Newsgroups: local.freebsd.questions References: <20010311185334.44513.qmail@web10706.mail.yahoo.com> X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.6 (NOV) Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In local.freebsd.questions you write: >Hi all i'm trying to convert the latest source to a >port I think i've done just about everything that I >need to accept i'm getting this error: >===> Building for bzflag-1.7e.1 >make -f Make-sys targets >"./Make-common", line 170: Need an operator >"./Make-common", line 173: Need an operator >"./Make-common", line 176: Need an operator >"././config", line 37: Need an operator >"././config", line 39: Need an operator >make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue >*** Error code 1 This usually happens when the makefiles are GNU-make specific. Put: USE_GMAKE= yes in the port Makefile and try again. $.02, /Mikko -- Mikko TyЖlДjДrvi_______________________________________mikko@rsasecurity.com RSA Security To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 16:57: 4 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mailhost01.reflexnet.net (mailhost01.reflexnet.net [64.6.192.82]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65CD637B71A for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 16:57:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cjc@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflexcom.com) Received: from rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflexcom.com ([216.196.73.168]) by mailhost01.reflexnet.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.197.19); Sun, 11 Mar 2001 16:55:00 -0800 Received: (from cjc@localhost) by rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflexcom.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f2C0uxw92110; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 16:56:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cjc) Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 16:56:52 -0800 From: "Crist J. Clark" To: "J.A. Terranson" Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Unable to boot/mount root to fixit. Message-ID: <20010311165652.J50418@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflex> Reply-To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from measl@mfn.org on Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 04:18:51PM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 04:18:51PM -0600, J.A. Terranson wrote: > > Greetings, > > I know *what* I did, and I knew I shouldn't have done it from > prior experience, but, being 1/2 asleep... > > cd / > chflags -R schg * > > I am no longer able to boot this box: it hangs when trying to > mount /dev/ad0s1e. The device is now immutable. Hard to mount an immutable device read-write. > Even worse, I am unable to mount from the fixit to try > and undo my mistake. I get an invalid super block error when trying to: > > mount /dev/ad0s1 /mnt > or > mount /dev/ad0s2 /mnt, etc... Is that a typo or did you actually try that? You want to mount, # mount /dev/ad0s1a /mnt ^ Of course. > I am in the process o rebuilding the box in question, as I don't > have time to play with it, but I am curious if anyone knows (1) why > chflaging from the root breaks everything, Making the device nodes immutable will cause breakage. > and (2) any way I could have > recovered from this? You were on the right track. Boot fixit.flp, mount the root partition of the disk (using the correct name ;) and, # chflags -R noschg /mnt You could repeat for the other partitions from fixit.flp, or boot off of the HDD into single-user at this point. -- Crist J. Clark cjclark@alum.mit.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 17: 4: 1 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mail.viasoft.com.cn (unknown [61.153.1.177]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF5CA37B718; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 17:03:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsddiy@21cn.com) Received: from William ([192.168.1.98]) by mail.viasoft.com.cn (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA13317; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 09:00:12 +0800 Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 09:09:50 +0800 From: David Xu X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.48f) Personal Reply-To: David Xu Organization: Viasoft X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <911471966.20010312090950@viasoft.com.cn> To: "Andrey A. Chernov" Cc: Kris Kennaway , Yifeng Xu , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Subject: Re[2]: **HEADS UP** bug fix for pr25439 (patch) In-reply-To: <20010312031125.A10601@nagual.pp.ru> References: <20010304124849.10752.qmail@web1704.mail.yahoo.com> <20010311160724.A70656@mollari.cthul.hu> <20010312031125.A10601@nagual.pp.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello Andrey, Monday, March 12, 2001, 8:11:26 AM, you wrote: AAC> On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 16:07:24 -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: >> Please submit this as a followup to the PR so that it is tracked in >> the bug DB. AAC> It is already fixed. what's wrong with the list? it is a very old article I post, but it comes back again, I have already sent PR with a patch for this bug. strange. -- David Xu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 17: 6: 1 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from smtp1.knology.net (user-24-214-63-11.knology.net [24.214.63.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8391037B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 17:05:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from n4cnw@knology.net) Received: (qmail 10072 invoked by uid 1003); 12 Mar 2001 01:00:39 -0000 Received: from user-24-214-56-170.knology.net (HELO n4cnw.dyndns.org) (24.214.56.170) by user-24-214-63-11.knology.net with SMTP; 12 Mar 2001 01:00:39 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Mike Murphree To: Subject: Re: KDE2 Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 19:05:54 -0600 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: In-Reply-To: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01031119055401.01286@n4cnw.dyndns.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Yep, since 2.1 came out. It worked fine with 2.0 Mike On Sunday 11 March 2001 06:52 pm, you wrote: > I am having an issue with KDE2 that I am wondering if anyone else has > noticed. > > When I rearange the icons and the logout when I log back in the icons are > back in the original locations. Everything else such as background and > newly created icons are there and saved but there locations will not save. > > > any help ! > > > > Colin Legendre CCNA, MCP > sudz@ns3g.com ---------------------------------------- Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"; name="Attachment: 1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: ---------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 17:22:25 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mailhost01.reflexnet.net (mailhost01.reflexnet.net [64.6.192.82]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CA5E37B71A for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 17:22:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cjc@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflexcom.com) Received: from rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflexcom.com ([216.196.73.168]) by mailhost01.reflexnet.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.197.19); Sun, 11 Mar 2001 17:20:02 -0800 Received: (from cjc@localhost) by rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflexcom.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f2C1M8w92217; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 17:22:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cjc) Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 17:22:03 -0800 From: "Crist J. Clark" To: Doug Young Cc: Michael Conlen , Matthew Rudderham , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: What Are Standard Procedures For System Backup Message-ID: <20010311172203.K50418@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflex> Reply-To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu References: <022501c0aa4d$a96a65e0$0200a8c0@apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <022501c0aa4d$a96a65e0$0200a8c0@apana.org.au>; from dougy@bryden.apana.org.au on Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 03:05:27AM +1000 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 03:05:27AM +1000, Doug Young wrote: > In order to "dump" EVERYTHING on a hard drive to a file, what command needs > to be used ?? I looked at "man dump" & the handbook section on backup but > neither provides much help ... nothing of consequence in the mailing list > archives either. I am not sure what you can't find in the docs. # dump -0af /path/to/dump/file /filesystem Should dump eveything on the /filesystem to the file named. You can then move that file to wherever you want to keep it using whatever means you feel most comfortable. OTOH, if you want to pipe the file straight to another machine using, say, SSH, # dump -0af - /filesystem | ssh -f another-machine "cat > /path/to/dump/file" I am not sure what is missing from the docs. -- Crist J. Clark cjclark@alum.mit.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 17:32:38 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx3out.umbc.edu (mx3out.umbc.edu [130.85.253.53]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BFA037B719 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 17:32:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gmiddl1@gl.umbc.edu) Received: from linux1.gl.umbc.edu (IDENT:gmiddl1@linux1.gl.umbc.edu [130.85.60.38]) by mx3out.umbc.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA27371 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 20:32:34 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 20:32:34 -0500 (EST) From: "G. Jason Middleton" To: Subject: QMAIL Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG does anybody know of any good how-to's for qmail? I have read life with qmail.....but i just need to set up a pop and smtp server for my domain. LWQ is a little difficult to understand in some spots. Thanks G. Jason Middleton _______________________________________________________________________________ Announcement: The revolution will not be televised. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 17:41:16 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mailhost01.reflexnet.net (mailhost01.reflexnet.net [64.6.192.82]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ACEC37B719 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 17:41:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cjc@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflexcom.com) Received: from rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflexcom.com ([216.196.73.168]) by mailhost01.reflexnet.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.197.19); Sun, 11 Mar 2001 17:39:06 -0800 Received: (from cjc@localhost) by rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflexcom.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f2C1fAU92415; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 17:41:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cjc) Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 17:41:09 -0800 From: "Crist J. Clark" To: Duraid Cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG" , "ipfilter@coombs.anu.edu.au" Subject: Re: how to reinstall ipf? Message-ID: <20010311174109.L50418@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflex> Reply-To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu References: <3AABA18C.8B3ADBB4@home.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3AABA18C.8B3ADBB4@home.com>; from latif2221@home.com on Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 11:02:20AM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 11:02:20AM -0500, Duraid wrote: > running freebsd 4.2 stable... how can i uninstall ipf and then install i > again. Ummm... Not sure what you mean here. Are you saying you want to nuke the current configuration and reload a new one? How to clear and realod your rules depends on exactly how you are using IPFilter. Or are you talking about ripping out some code and rebuilding? There is no real practical way _remove_ all of the code since it some of it lives in the kernel without rebuilding the whole system. But if you want to rebuild your system, http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/current-stable.html#STABLE Is the place to start. -- Crist J. Clark cjclark@alum.mit.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 18: 2:30 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mta6.snfc21.pbi.net (mta6.snfc21.pbi.net [206.13.28.240]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 977D537B719 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 18:02:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from craigze@pacbell.net) Received: from 4668 ([63.203.103.233]) by mta6.snfc21.pbi.net (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.2000.01.05.12.18.p9) with SMTP id <0GA200JWRAZ0OU@mta6.snfc21.pbi.net> for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 18:01:49 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 18:01:20 -0800 From: Craig Hill Subject: Hi To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Message-id: <000801c0aa98$55c68b80$6401a8c0@4668> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0005_01C0AA55.46D9E100" X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 X-Priority: 3 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C0AA55.46D9E100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi,=20 I just bought FreeBSD 4.2 four cd-rom set. I was looking through the = cd's I have and was wondering where the uncompiled full source code is = for the OS. Let me know so I know where it is. Thanks. Craig ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C0AA55.46D9E100 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
 I just bought FreeBSD 4.2 four = cd-rom=20 set.  I was looking through the cd's I have and was wondering where = the=20 uncompiled full source code is for the OS.  Let me know so I know = where it=20 is.
Thanks.
 
Craig
------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C0AA55.46D9E100-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 18: 3:57 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from cliff.mfn.org (cliff.mfn.org [204.238.179.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 215D737B719 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 18:03:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from measl@mfn.org) Received: from greeves.mfn.org (greeves.mfn.org [204.238.179.3]) by cliff.mfn.org (8.11.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f2C23BM60605; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 20:03:12 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from measl@mfn.org) Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 20:03:11 -0600 (CST) From: "J.A. Terranson" To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Unable to boot/mount root to fixit. In-Reply-To: <20010311165652.J50418@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflex> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Crist J. Clark wrote: > The device is now immutable. Hard to mount an immutable device > read-write. Ya, but I was also unable to mount it ro . > > Even worse, I am unable to mount from the fixit to try > > and undo my mistake. I get an invalid super block error when trying to: > > > > mount /dev/ad0s1 /mnt > > or > > mount /dev/ad0s2 /mnt, etc... > > Is that a typo or did you actually try that? You want to mount, > > # mount /dev/ad0s1a /mnt No typo. I originally tried /dev/ad0s1a, but there was no such device available to me. Since ad0s1 was the closest I could get, I tried it... > Making the device nodes immutable will cause breakage. So I see > > and (2) any way I could have > > recovered from this? > > You were on the right track. Boot fixit.flp, mount the root partition > of the disk (using the correct name ;) and, > > # chflags -R noschg /mnt Which is *exactly* where I was headed, but, with no ad0s1a, and no way I could find to make the node, I was hosed... :-( > You could repeat for the other partitions from fixit.flp, or boot off > of the HDD into single-user at this point. I'll need to do this again later in the week if I can find the time: obviously I screwed up *somewhere*... Thanks for the info! -- Yours, J.A. Terranson sysadmin@mfn.org If Governments really want us to behave like civilized human beings, they should give serious consideration towards setting a better example: Ruling by force, rather than consensus; the unrestrained application of unjust laws (which the victim-populations were never allowed input on in the first place); the State policy of justice only for the rich and elected; the intentional abuse and occassionally destruction of entire populations merely to distract an already apathetic and numb electorate... This type of demogoguery must surely wipe out the fascist United States as surely as it wiped out the fascist Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. The views expressed here are mine, and NOT those of my employers, associates, or others. Besides, if it *were* the opinion of all of those people, I doubt there would be a problem to bitch about in the first place... -------------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 18:52: 9 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from dsns.csie.nctu.edu.tw (dsns.csie.nctu.edu.tw [140.113.216.143]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D679837B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 18:52:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eric@dsns.csie.nctu.edu.tw) Received: (from eric@localhost) by dsns.csie.nctu.edu.tw (8.11.2/8.11.1) id f2C2pa962446 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 10:51:36 +0800 (CST) (envelope-from eric) From: eric Message-Id: <200103120251.f2C2pa962446@dsns.csie.nctu.edu.tw> Subject: Update port To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 10:51:36 +0800 (CST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi ... I'm newbie in FreeBSD Would someone tell me please how to update my port collection ? Er1c To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 19:18:39 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from po4.wam.umd.edu (po4.wam.umd.edu [128.8.10.166]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4C1B37B719 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 19:18:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cschindl@wam.umd.edu) Received: from rac4.wam.umd.edu (IDENT:root@rac4.wam.umd.edu [128.8.10.144]) by po4.wam.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA25889; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:18:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from rac4.wam.umd.edu (IDENT:sendmail@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rac4.wam.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id WAA08201; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:18:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (cschindl@localhost) by rac4.wam.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA08194; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:18:31 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: rac4.wam.umd.edu: cschindl owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:18:31 -0500 (EST) From: "c. schindler" To: Kris Kennaway Cc: Julian Bolivar , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.3 Release... In-Reply-To: <20010311150818.B68661@mollari.cthul.hu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG what are the differences between this version (4.3) and the previous? ---------- chris On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 02:29:54PM -0400, Julian Bolivar wrote: > > Hello, please the FreeBSD 4.3 Release is on time? (to March 2001), because I > > preorder it and I check that I scheduled mount the server with it at the > > April's first week, or I need to reschedule this project. > > As far as I know, the release is on time and will be available for > download according to the schedule posted in several places already. > However, the CD release always follows a few weeks after that, and I > don't know of the schedule. If you need this release on a deadline > the best bet is to download it from the network (an ISO image of the > first CD will be provided as usual so you can even burn your own CD) > > Kris > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 19:23:56 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from george.he.net (george.he.net [216.218.157.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA28837B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 19:23:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bill@wiliweld.com) Received: from corten8.wiliweld.com (adsl-63-193-247-201.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.193.247.201]) by george.he.net (8.8.6/8.8.2) with ESMTP id TAA20660; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 19:23:45 -0800 Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 19:20:58 -0800 (PST) From: Bill Schoolcraft X-Sender: To: Cc: Subject: Re: FreeBSD on laptop In-Reply-To: <3AAC0B11.6B8DD104@freesurf.ch> Message-ID: System-ID: [en] (I; SunOS 5.8 i86pc) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At Mon, 12 Mar 2001 it looks like gabism@freesurf.ch composed: gabism->Hello! gabism-> gabism->Did anyone had any problem installing/running FreeBSD 4.2 on a laptop gabism->Compaq 1240 with 64 Mb RAM and a video card Neomagic 2Mb? gabism-> ........... I almost gave up on this one laptop with FreeBSD-4.2, when I tried 4.1 it installed fine. Don't ask me why. -- Bill Schoolcraft PO Box 210076 -o) San Francisco CA 94121 /\ "UNIX, A Way Of Life." _\_v http://forwardslashunix.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 19:36: 7 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mail.lapindo.co.id (lapindo.co.id [202.155.75.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8126437B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 19:35:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sfdn@lapindo.co.id) Received: from LAPINDO2 ([192.168.100.2]) by mail.lapindo.co.id (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f2C3amR10264 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 10:37:01 +0700 (JAVT) (envelope-from sfdn@lapindo.co.id) Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 10:33:42 +0700 From: Saifuddin X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.49) UNREG / CD5BF9353B3B7091 Reply-To: Saifuddin Organization: Lapindo Brantas, Inc X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <5210685124.20010312103342@lapindo.co.id> To: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: To read wtmp files Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello questions, How to read then contents of wtmp file. Is there tools? -- Best regards, Saifuddin mailto:sfdn@lapindo.co.id To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 19:50:20 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from hotmail.com (f41.law12.hotmail.com [64.4.19.41]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ECF037B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 19:50:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsdblood@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 19:50:17 -0800 Received: from 203.121.16.73 by lw12fd.law12.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 03:50:17 GMT X-Originating-IP: [203.121.16.73] From: "BSD Blood" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: sendmail vs other MTAs Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 03:50:17 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Mar 2001 03:50:17.0333 (UTC) FILETIME=[8D4DF250:01C0AAA7] Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello. I've been using FreeBSD for 4 months. What are your opinions on sendmail compared to the other MTAs like postfix,qmail, etc. on FreeBSD. Which one is more stable, easy to configure, secure, etc. ? I need to decide which one to use as my SMTP server. I have little experience with sendmail, but I don't really like it because I find it too difficult to configure and there are just too much documentation to read. _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 19:56: 9 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from femail2.rdc1.on.home.com (femail2.rdc1.on.home.com [24.2.9.89]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E0DA37B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 19:56:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from latif2221@home.com) Received: from home.com ([24.114.36.13]) by femail2.rdc1.on.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with ESMTP id <20010312035559.JZBR606.femail2.rdc1.on.home.com@home.com>; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 19:55:59 -0800 Message-ID: <3AAC450E.C087160F@home.com> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:39:58 -0500 From: Duraid X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "T@W" , "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG" , "ipfilter@coombs.anu.edu.au" Subject: Re: ipf and ipfstat, something wrong???? References: <200103100818.TAA26608@avalon.reed.wattle.id.au> <3AAA3F6E.A054B6F5@home.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG no i just have the /sbin/ipf root:/dev# find / -name ipf /usr/src/sbin/ipf /sbin/ipf Duraid "T@W" wrote: > Duraid encoded: > >how do i get the version of ipfstat? > > > >root:~# ipf -V > >ipf: IP Filter: v3.4.8 (264) > >Kernel: > >Running: no > >Log Flags: 0 = none set > >Default: nomatch -> block all, Logging: unavailable > >Active list: 0 > >Segmentation fault (core dumped) > > > >note the segmentation fault > > > >Duraid > > You probably have 2 different versions of ipf on your machine. > (1 in /sbin & 1 in /usr/sbin for example). > > T@W To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 20: 3:21 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from dohpah.com (dsl-64-34-45-93.telocity.com [64.34.45.93]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC8D537B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 20:03:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from paulv@dohpah.com) Received: from dohpah.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dohpah.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f2C43F508062 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:03:16 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from paulv@dohpah.com) Message-ID: <3AAC4A83.8FB57806@dohpah.com> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:03:15 -0600 From: Paul Voith Organization: Dohpah X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.2-20010204-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Text file busy. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG VG8gd2hvbWV2ZXINCg0KU29ycnkgdG8gYmUgYSBib3RoZXIgYnV0IEkgZG9uJ3Qga25vdyBp ZiB0aGlzIGlzIGEgImJ1ZyIgb3IgIChtb3JlDQpsaWtlbHkpIGp1c3QgaWdub3JhbmNlIG9u IG15IHBhcnQuDQoNCldoaWxlIHJ1bm5pbmcgYSBUY2wvVGsgc2NyaXB0ICh3aXNoOC4zKSB1 bmRlciBGcmVlQlNEDQo0LjItMjAwMTAyMDQtU1RBQkxFIEkgaGF2ZSByZWNlbnRseSBhbmQg Y29uc2lzdGVudGx5IG1hbmFnZWQgdG8gZ2VuZXJhdGUNCmZpbGVzIHdoaWNoLCB3aGVuIGV4 ZWN1dGVkLCBkZWxpdmVyIGEgIlRleHQgZmlsZSBidXN5IiBlcnJvci4NCg0KQXQgZmlyc3Qg SSB0aG91Z2h0IHRoaXMgd2FzIGEgVGNsIGdlbmVyYXRlZCBlcnJvciBtZXNzYWdlIGJ1dCBl dmVuIGlmIEkNCmNoYW5nZSB0aGUgY29udGVudHMgb2YgdGhlIGZpbGUgdG8gc2ltcGxlIGNz aCBzY3JpcHQgIEkgZ2V0IHRoZSBzYW1lDQplcnJvci4gUmVuYW1pbmcgdGhlIGZpbGUgYWxz byBoYXMgbm8gZWZmZWN0LiBPbmx5IGJ5IGNvcHlpbmcgdGhlIGZpbGUNCmNhbiBJIGV4ZWN1 dGUgaXQgbm9ybWFsbHkuIEl0IGlzIG11Y2ggbGlrZSB0aGUgaW5vZGUgaGFzIGJlZW4gbWFy a2VkIGluDQpzb21lIHdheSBidXQgSSBjYW5ub3Qgc2VlbSB0byAidW5tYXJrIiBpdCBieSBh bnkgbWVhbnMgSSBrbm93IG9mLg0KDQpJIHNlYXJjaGVkIGEgYml0IG9uICJUZXh0IGZpbGUg ZXJyb3IiIGFuZCB3YXMgYnJvdWdodCB0byBhbiBlbWFpbCB0aHJlYWQNCm9uIGZyZWVic2Qu b3JnIHdoaWNoIHJlY2VudGx5IGNvbmNlcm5lZCBpdHNlbGYgd2l0aCB0aGlzIGJ1dCBJIGFt IGFmcmFpZA0KdGhlIGRpc2N1c3Npb24gb2Ygdm5vZGVzIGFuZCBjYWNoZSBpc3N1ZXMgaXMg d2VsbCBiZXlvbmQgbXkga2VuLiBJIGRpZA0KaW50dWl0IHRoYXQgdGhlcmUgd2FzIGEgZGVi YXRlIGFtb25nIHRoZSBleHBlcnRzIGFzIHRvIHdoZXRoZXIgdGhlIGdlbnVzDQpvZiB0aGlz IG1lc3NhZ2UgaGFkIGFueSBzaWduaWZpY2FudCBuZWdhdGl2ZSBpbXBhY3QuIEkgd2FzIHdv bmRlcmluZyBpZg0KbXkgcHJvYmxlbSB3YXMgYSBtYW5pZmVzdGF0aW9uIG9mIGp1c3Qgc3Vj aCBhIGNhc2UuDQoNCkl0IG1heSBhbHNvIGJlIHVzZWZ1bCB0byBrbm93IChJIGFtIHN1cHBv c2luZyBiZWNhdXNlIG15IGdvb2dsZSBzZWFyY2gNCmhpdCBhIGxpbmsgd2hpY2ggdXNlZCB0 aGUgd29yZHMgInNhbWJhIiBhbmQgInRleHQgZmlsZSBlcnJvciIgaW4gdGhlDQpzYW1lIHBh cmFncmFwaCkgdGhhdCBJIGFtIHJ1bm5pbmcgYSBzYW1iYSBtb3VudCB3aGljaCBzZXJ2ZXMg dGhlIHNhbWUNCmZpbGUgc3lzdGVtIHRvIGEgd2luOTUgYm94Lg0KDQpBbnl3YXkgSSBjYW4g d29yayBhcm91bmQgdGhpcyBwcm9ibGVtPw0KDQpUaGFua3MNCg0KcGF1bCB2b2l0aA0KcGF1 bHZAZG9ocGFoLmNvbQ0K To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 20: 9:32 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from femail2.rdc1.on.home.com (femail2.rdc1.on.home.com [24.2.9.89]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3FC437B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 20:09:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from latif2221@home.com) Received: from home.com ([24.114.36.13]) by femail2.rdc1.on.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with ESMTP id <20010312040921.KIGV606.femail2.rdc1.on.home.com@home.com>; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 20:09:21 -0800 Message-ID: <3AAC4830.48EE984E@home.com> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:53:20 -0500 From: Duraid X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tony Storm , "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: Re: Linux or FreeBSD References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG go with freebsd .. when you ask questions you only get one answer.. linux is not like that .. when you ask a linux question everybody goes ...oh well! it depends... not because they don't want to help but this is the truth ... linux comes with different flavors and gives different solutions to different problems... and this is very confusing to a newbie... even if would like to choose linux don't go with redhat because you won't understand why all the fuss around linux.. it's not REALLY stable and not easy to use and with ton's of bugs.. why not use windows then?.. go with slackware (slackware.com). Duraid To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 20:12:52 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mailhost01.reflexnet.net (mailhost01.reflexnet.net [64.6.192.82]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91AB937B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 20:12:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cjc@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflexcom.com) Received: from rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflexcom.com ([216.196.73.168]) by mailhost01.reflexnet.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.197.19); Sun, 11 Mar 2001 20:10:38 -0800 Received: (from cjc@localhost) by rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflexcom.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f2C4Bfu93401; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 20:11:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cjc) Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 20:11:20 -0800 From: "Crist J. Clark" To: Saifuddin Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: To read wtmp files Message-ID: <20010311201120.M50418@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflex> Reply-To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu References: <5210685124.20010312103342@lapindo.co.id> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <5210685124.20010312103342@lapindo.co.id>; from sfdn@lapindo.co.id on Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 10:33:42AM +0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 10:33:42AM +0700, Saifuddin wrote: > Hello questions, > > How to read then contents of wtmp file. Is there tools? last(1). -- Crist J. Clark cjclark@alum.mit.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 20:39:24 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from smtp.whitebarn.com (Spin.whitebarn.com [216.0.13.113]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E510F37B718; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 20:39:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Bob@Talarian.Com) Received: from Talarian.Com (Relent.Bob.whitebarn.com [216.0.13.50]) by smtp.whitebarn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA16567; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:39:17 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from Bob@Talarian.Com) Message-ID: <3AAC52F4.1000602@Talarian.Com> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:39:16 -0600 From: Bob Van Valzah User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386; en-US; 0.8) Gecko/20010215 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD-Security@FreeBSD.Org Cc: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.Org Subject: Racoon Problem & Cisco Tunnel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have several remote FreeBSD users who want to connect their home LANs to my trusted network over an IPSec tunnel via a DSL connection. I'd like my end of the tunnel to terminate on a Cisco if possible. (Though I do have many FreeBSD boxes handy, I just feel better when layer-2 infrastructure doesn't depend on boxes with hard drives.) Any general advice on how to do this would be appreciated. As near as I can tell, I have to run racoon and configure it for pre-shared keys to talk to the cisco. But I don't think the racoon is even starting right. I get this message: "ERROR: pfkey.c:207:pfkey_handler(): pfkey X_SPDDUMP failed No such file or directory." Happens with the config files I've written and the stock ones. I'm running a freshly sup'd box with racoon-20010222a built from ports. All help and advice appreciated. Thanks, Bob To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 20:45:45 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.unixathome.org (ns1.unixathome.org [203.79.82.27]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F150F37B71A for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 20:45:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: from wocker (wocker.int.nz.freebsd.org [192.168.0.99]) by ns1.unixathome.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2C4jew13689; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 17:45:40 +1300 (NZDT) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Message-Id: <200103120445.f2C4jew13689@ns1.unixathome.org> From: "Dan Langille" Organization: novice in training To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 17:45:39 +1300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: ipfstat -t option requires recompile, but how? Reply-To: dan@langille.org Cc: dan@langille.org X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'm trying to recompile ipfilter to obtain ncurses support for the ipfstat -t option. So I've modifed /usr/src/contrib/ipfilter/Makefile to add into ncurses support: # Uncomment the next 3 lines if you want to view the state table a la top(1) # (requires that you have installed ncurses). STATETOP_CFLAGS=-DSTATETOP # # Where to find the ncurses include files (if not in default path), # STATETOP_INC=/usr/include/ #STATETOP_INC=-I/usr/local/include # # How to link the ncurses library # #STATETOP_LIB=-lncurses #STATETOP_LIB=-L/usr/local/lib -lncurses STATETOP_LIB=-L/usr/lib/ -llibncurses Those changes may or may not be correct.... Then I try to compile: [root@xeon:/usr/src/contrib/ipfilter] # make freebsd4 if [ ! -f netinet/done ] ; then (cd netinet; ln -s ../*.h .; ln -s ../ip_ftp_pxy.c .; ln -s ../ip_rcmd_pxy.c .; ln -s ../ip_raudio_pxy.c .); (cd netinet; ln -s ../ipsend/tcpip.h tcpip.h); touch netinet/done; fi cd: can't cd to netinet *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/src/contrib/ipfilter. Where did I go wrong? -- Dan Langille pgpkey - finger dan@unixathome.org | http://unixathome.org/finger.php got any work? I'm looking for some. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 20:50:17 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from smtprelay1.adelphia.net (smtprelay1.adelphia.net [64.8.25.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A58A837B719; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 20:50:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from packetwhore@stargate.net) Received: from pa-westmifflin1a-385.pit.adelphia.net ([24.48.239.129]) by smtprelay1.adelphia.net (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id GA2IQX00.U4C; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 23:49:45 -0500 Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 23:42:59 -0500 (EST) From: pW X-X-Sender: To: Bob Van Valzah Cc: , Subject: Re: Racoon Problem & Cisco Tunnel In-Reply-To: <3AAC52F4.1000602@Talarian.Com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Out of curiosity... do your DSL users have public static IPs? I work at an ISP and almost all of our DSL customers have static private IPs and use NAT for public ones... just wondering because you may have to enable some sort of NAT transparency otherwise it may break the VPN... just a thought... shawn On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Bob Van Valzah wrote: > I have several remote FreeBSD users who want to connect their home LANs > to my trusted network over an IPSec tunnel via a DSL connection. I'd > like my end of the tunnel to terminate on a Cisco if possible. (Though I > do have many FreeBSD boxes handy, I just feel better when layer-2 > infrastructure doesn't depend on boxes with hard drives.) Any general > advice on how to do this would be appreciated. > > As near as I can tell, I have to run racoon and configure it for > pre-shared keys to talk to the cisco. But I don't think the racoon is > even starting right. I get this message: "ERROR: > pfkey.c:207:pfkey_handler(): pfkey X_SPDDUMP failed No such file or > directory." Happens with the config files I've written and the stock > ones. I'm running a freshly sup'd box with racoon-20010222a built from > ports. > > All help and advice appreciated. > > Thanks, > > Bob > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 20:53:14 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mailhost01.reflexnet.net (mailhost01.reflexnet.net [64.6.192.82]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C929737B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 20:53:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cjc@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflexcom.com) Received: from rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflexcom.com ([216.196.73.168]) by mailhost01.reflexnet.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.197.19); Sun, 11 Mar 2001 20:51:09 -0800 Received: (from cjc@localhost) by rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflexcom.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f2C4rBT93639; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 20:53:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cjc) Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 20:53:10 -0800 From: "Crist J. Clark" To: "J.A. Terranson" Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Unable to boot/mount root to fixit. Message-ID: <20010311205310.N50418@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflex> Reply-To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu References: <20010311165652.J50418@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflex> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from measl@mfn.org on Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 08:03:11PM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 08:03:11PM -0600, J.A. Terranson wrote: > > On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Crist J. Clark wrote: > > > The device is now immutable. Hard to mount an immutable device > > read-write. > > Ya, but I was also unable to mount it ro . Hmm... I was playing with marking nodes schg and it did not seem to create any problems. Dunno what the problem was for sure. -- Crist J. Clark cjclark@alum.mit.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 21: 1:17 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mailhost01.reflexnet.net (mailhost01.reflexnet.net [64.6.192.82]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A4E237B719 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 21:01:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cjc@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflexcom.com) Received: from rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflexcom.com ([216.196.73.168]) by mailhost01.reflexnet.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.197.19); Sun, 11 Mar 2001 20:59:05 -0800 Received: (from cjc@localhost) by rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflexcom.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f2C51DH93750; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 21:01:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cjc) Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 21:01:12 -0800 From: "Crist J. Clark" To: Dan Langille Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ipfstat -t option requires recompile, but how? Message-ID: <20010311210112.O50418@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflex> Reply-To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu References: <200103120445.f2C4jew13689@ns1.unixathome.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200103120445.f2C4jew13689@ns1.unixathome.org>; from dan@langille.org on Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 05:45:39PM +1300 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 05:45:39PM +1300, Dan Langille wrote: [snip] > [root@xeon:/usr/src/contrib/ipfilter] # make freebsd4 > if [ ! -f netinet/done ] ; then (cd netinet; ln -s ../*.h .; ln -s ../ip_ftp_pxy.c > .; ln -s ../ip_rcmd_pxy.c .; ln -s ../ip_raudio_pxy.c .); (cd netinet; ln -s > ../ipsend/tcpip.h tcpip.h); touch netinet/done; fi > cd: can't cd to netinet > *** Error code 2 > > Stop in /usr/src/contrib/ipfilter. > > Where did I go wrong? You probably want to, # cd /usr/src/sbin/ipfstat # make Building from the /usr/src/contrib/* generally does not work. -- Crist J. Clark cjclark@alum.mit.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 21: 4:24 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.unixathome.org (ns1.unixathome.org [203.79.82.27]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8502F37B71A for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 21:04:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: from wocker (wocker.int.nz.freebsd.org [192.168.0.99]) by ns1.unixathome.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2C54Hw13823; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 18:04:17 +1300 (NZDT) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Message-Id: <200103120504.f2C54Hw13823@ns1.unixathome.org> From: "Dan Langille" Organization: novice in training To: "Crist J. Clark" Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 18:04:16 +1300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: Re: ipfstat -t option requires recompile, but how? Reply-To: dan@langille.org Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: <20010311210112.O50418@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflex> References: <200103120445.f2C4jew13689@ns1.unixathome.org>; from dan@langille.org on Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 05:45:39PM +1300 X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 11 Mar 2001, at 21:01, Crist J. Clark wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 05:45:39PM +1300, Dan Langille wrote: > > [snip] > > > [root@xeon:/usr/src/contrib/ipfilter] # make freebsd4 > > if [ ! -f netinet/done ] ; then (cd netinet; ln -s ../*.h .; ln -s ../ip_ftp_pxy.c > > .; ln -s ../ip_rcmd_pxy.c .; ln -s ../ip_raudio_pxy.c .); (cd netinet; ln -s > > ../ipsend/tcpip.h tcpip.h); touch netinet/done; fi > > cd: can't cd to netinet > > *** Error code 2 > > > > Stop in /usr/src/contrib/ipfilter. > > > > Where did I go wrong? > > You probably want to, > > # cd /usr/src/sbin/ipfstat > # make > > Building from the /usr/src/contrib/* generally does not work. DOH! Thanks. I'd been to that directory earlier today and was confused by the lack of any source code. That's when I moved to main ipf directory. However, I suspect there is more I must do. After doing: # make clean # make all install I still get this: # ipfstat -t ipfstat : state top facility not compiled in -- Dan Langille pgpkey - finger dan@unixathome.org | http://unixathome.org/finger.php got any work? I'm looking for some. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 21: 7:31 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from hotmail.com (f153.law11.hotmail.com [64.4.17.153]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A253A37B71A for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 21:07:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from burnscharlesn@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 21:07:25 -0800 Received: from 24.21.122.151 by lw11fd.law11.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 05:07:25 GMT X-Originating-IP: [24.21.122.151] From: "Charles Burns" To: bsdblood@hotmail.com, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sendmail vs other MTAs Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:07:25 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Mar 2001 05:07:25.0404 (UTC) FILETIME=[53D989C0:01C0AAB2] Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG You might consider qmail. Many FreeBSD people don't seem to like its' license very much, but it is a good MTA. It is extremely secure. As the author brags on his website (http://www.qmail.org/top.html) there have been several cash rewards over the years offered for anybody that could find a security hole in qmail. None were ever claimed. Sendmail, OTOH, has been the poster child for remote root exploits for years. I have not heard of any such exploits for quite a while though. qmail is also said to be faster by far than Sendmail by far, but this probably won't matter unless you have hundreds of thousands of messages per day to process. The author makes some rather extreme claims about qmail, such as the claim that under BSD with no softupdates and no async, qmail is "crashproof". He gives tips for making mail reliable and then says "You may encounter people who dispute one or more of the above statements. Those people don't know what they're talking about." In any case, qmail is used by several big servers (as is Sendmail). These include Hotmail (unless MS has finally been able to make Exchange Server handle the load without crashing), Slashdot, RedHat, and others. >From: "BSD Blood" >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: sendmail vs other MTAs >Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 03:50:17 -0000 > >Hello. I've been using FreeBSD for 4 months. What are your opinions on >sendmail compared to the other MTAs like postfix,qmail, etc. on FreeBSD. >Which one is more stable, easy to configure, secure, etc. ? I need to >decide >which one to use as my SMTP server. I have little experience with sendmail, >but I don't really like it because I find it too difficult to configure and >there are just too much documentation to read. > >_________________________________________________________________________ >Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 21:13:47 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mail.canadiangeneral.com (monster.cangen.net [209.135.123.195]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFA1F37B71A for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 21:13:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from toushek@canadiangeneral.com) Received: from stinky [216.208.80.140] by mail.canadiangeneral.com (SMTPD32-6.00) id A947313B002A; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 00:06:15 -0500 From: "Alex Toushek" To: Subject: Secure user dirs Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 00:11:10 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Is there an easy way to lock other users out of dirs? ie. to keep other users from looking at the contents or downloading the contents of other users apache htdocs files but still give apache access to serve the pages? This is on a webserver that multiple people have access to pretty much everyone's dirs. Which is very bad I just want to try and lock them into their own dir or lock access out of other users dirs. I have played with file permissons with no success. Alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 21:16:25 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from femail2.rdc1.on.home.com (femail2.rdc1.on.home.com [24.2.9.89]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBD3D37B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 21:16:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from latif2221@home.com) Received: from home.com ([24.114.36.13]) by femail2.rdc1.on.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with ESMTP id <20010312051614.LWUA606.femail2.rdc1.on.home.com@home.com>; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 21:16:14 -0800 Message-ID: <3AAC57DE.FF1715C0@home.com> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 00:00:14 -0500 From: Duraid X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tony Storm , "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: Re: Linux or FreeBSD References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG go for it ... it's even easier to install linux applications on freebsd than linux... everything you need is under /usr/ports ... just for the beginning my advice is to download a stable-release (4.2 for now 4.3 a week or so ...not much difference.. for a newbie kde2.1 maybe) and stick with it don't upgrade untill you get a grip on the system. if you hear any thing about rpms they are a big mess and such a non-standard standard. Duraid Tony Storm wrote: > Thanks for the advice. There are SO many different options. It becomes a > bit overwhelming for a newbie. I just want to get started with a good > system. I thought about doing a dual boot, but haven't decided. Are there > as many applications available for FreeBSD? or does freebsd run everything > that linux runs. > > My primary goal is to learn how to secure a network. > > - Tony > > -----Original Message----- > From: duraid [mailto:duraid]On Behalf Of Duraid > Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2001 7:53 PM > To: Tony Storm; freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: Linux or FreeBSD > > go with freebsd .. when you ask questions you only get one answer.. > linux is not like that .. when you ask a linux question everybody goes > ...oh well! it depends... not because they don't want to help but this > is the truth ... linux comes with different flavors and gives different > solutions to different problems... and this is very confusing to a > newbie... even if would like to choose linux don't go with redhat > because you won't understand why all the fuss around linux.. it's not > REALLY stable and not easy to use and with ton's of bugs.. why not use > windows then?.. go with slackware (slackware.com). > > Duraid To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 21:21:31 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from bryden.apana.org.au (bryden.apana.org.au [203.3.126.129]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A00F537B719 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 21:21:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dougy@bryden.apana.org.au) Received: from roadrunner (roadrunner.apana.org.au [203.3.126.132]) by bryden.apana.org.au (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f2C5Jhq00286; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 15:19:48 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from dougy@bryden.apana.org.au) Message-ID: <003b01c0aab4$400553a0$847e03cb@apana.org.au> From: "Doug Young" To: Cc: "Michael Conlen" , "Matthew Rudderham" , References: <022501c0aa4d$a96a65e0$0200a8c0@apana.org.au> <20010311172203.K50418@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflex> Subject: Re: What Are Standard Procedures For System Backup Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 15:20:40 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thanks ... makes at least part of it a bit clearer than the awful man page. I think I understand the purpose of that "-0af", & "path to dump file" looks like its sorta like /backup (assuming its a local partition) ?? The useage of "filesystem" here is not clear however ... man filesystem doesn't tell me anything > I am not sure what you can't find in the docs. The docs don't provide info in an intelligible format on exactly how to use "dump" I get TOTALLY confused with the extremely obtuse synopsis stuff in most man pages, (man ppp is a notable exception) as do many others of my acquaintance. Thankfully there are usable explanations of many things at one of the user-friendly sites like freebsddiary / bsdvault / lnova / etc, but unfortunately there doesn't appear to be any articles on dump / restore. I guess the the format of official docs is meaningful to experts, but many other users have extreme difficulty making any sense out of them. Many others have asked the same thing previously, but here we go again. Why can't we have some "step_by_step" explanations & sample usage rather than that impossibly vague synopsis stuff ?? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 21:23:22 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from hotmail.com (f188.law11.hotmail.com [64.4.17.188]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B671437B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 21:23:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from burnscharlesn@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 21:23:18 -0800 Received: from 24.21.122.151 by lw11fd.law11.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 05:23:18 GMT X-Originating-IP: [24.21.122.151] From: "Charles Burns" To: grog@lemis.com Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: No man pages for root Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:23:18 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Mar 2001 05:23:18.0855 (UTC) FILETIME=[8C269D70:01C0AAB4] Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG A second reboot seems to have fixed the problem. Odd. Thanks for the reply, though. >From: Greg Lehey >To: Charles Burns >CC: questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: No man pages for root >Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 11:10:46 +1030 > >On Sunday, 11 March 2001 at 10:46:23 -0700, Charles Burns wrote: > > Hello FreeBSD people, > > For no apparent reason, root can no longer use man pages on my FreeBSD > > machine. Normal users, however, can use man pages just fine. > > Whenever any man command is given in root, root gets the message "No >manual > > entry for foo." > > The last thing that I did was modify some of the files in >/usr/share/skel, > > but I fail to see what that has to do with anything. I may have >unwittingly > > done something else that I cannot remember, though. > > Note that "manpath" returns the exact same value for both root and >normal > > users, which is the default manpath. > > > > Does anybody have any ideas as to how this might be remedied? > >What does "echo $MANPATH" say? > >Greg >-- >When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. >If you don't, I may ignore the reply. >For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html >Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key >See complete headers for address and phone numbers _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 21:28:57 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from bryden.apana.org.au (bryden.apana.org.au [203.3.126.129]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E432637B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 21:28:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dougy@bryden.apana.org.au) Received: from roadrunner (roadrunner.apana.org.au [203.3.126.132]) by bryden.apana.org.au (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f2C5Sdq00321 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 15:28:41 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from dougy@bryden.apana.org.au) Message-ID: <004501c0aab5$70074120$847e03cb@apana.org.au> From: "Doug Young" To: Subject: documentation issues generally Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 15:29:36 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Is there anything that can be done about improving the usability of documentation so that its intelligible to ALL levels of user and not only the extremely experienced ? The growing number of user-friendly sites makes it obvious that much of the stuff just doesn't make sense to many users. I did subscribe to the docs list for a while in the hope that I could help to make a little difference, but those guys speak some language from another galaxy !!! Has anyone ever considered the possibility that documentation comprehensible to regular users might cut down on the hundreds of questions posted to this list daily ?? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 21:35:19 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from hotmail.com (f84.law11.hotmail.com [64.4.17.84]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A188E37B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 21:35:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from burnscharlesn@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 21:35:15 -0800 Received: from 24.21.122.151 by lw11fd.law11.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 05:35:15 GMT X-Originating-IP: [24.21.122.151] From: "Charles Burns" To: gmiddl1@gl.umbc.edu, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: QMAIL Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:35:15 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Mar 2001 05:35:15.0862 (UTC) FILETIME=[37853360:01C0AAB6] Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG There are several that can be found on Google or Google.com/bsd. One can also find plenty of documentation at www.qmail.org, subscribe to the qmail-specific mailing list (qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to), or search the mailing lists at http://www-archive.ornl.gov port 8000 The search system seems to want people to download an executable file and presumably execute it before searching, so I don't personally use the mailing list search tool. >From: "G. Jason Middleton" >To: >Subject: QMAIL >Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 20:32:34 -0500 (EST) > >does anybody know of any good how-to's for qmail? I have read life with >qmail.....but i just need to set up a pop and smtp server for my domain. >LWQ is a little difficult to understand in some spots. > >Thanks > > > >G. Jason Middleton > > >_______________________________________________________________________________ > > > > > > >Announcement: > >The revolution will not be televised. > > > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 21:36:35 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from gull.prod.itd.earthlink.net (gull.prod.itd.earthlink.net [207.217.121.85]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40AB837B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 21:36:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cublai@earthlink.net) Received: from Nero (1Cust212.tnt1.longmont.co.da.uu.net [63.29.61.212]) by gull.prod.itd.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with SMTP id VAA18585 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 21:36:31 -0800 (PST) From: z thompson To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: kde2 install problems Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:21:41 -0700 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.28] Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01031122363101.49549@Nero> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I have been trying to install kde2 for the last week or so with no success. It keeps failing on the build of kdesupport2 with the error: configure: error: Qt (>= Qt 2.2.2) (libraries) not found. Please check your installation! For more details about this problem, look at the end of config.log. I have looked at the config.log in kdesupport2 as it says and find only this: configure: failed program was: #include "confdefs.h" #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #if ! (QT_VERSION >= 222) #error 1 #endif int main() { QStringList *t = new QStringList(); QIconView iv(0); iv.setWordWrapIconText(false); QString s; s.setLatin1("Elvis is alive", 14); int magnolia = QEvent::Speech; /* new in 2.2 beta2 */ return 0; I have installed qt-2.2.4 before trying the make of kde2 and I have tried letting the make of kde2 install it and in both cases it fails with this error. How is it determining the QT version and why isn't the correct version being recognized? Can anyone help me out on this? Thanks, Zach Thompson -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.5.8 iQA/AwUBOqxgYpCjAI4/vZatEQJ3FACgu8JIaN87b1Zod3bwlT/squ57kasAniyN M5SL7hW0gCCntua8MNQsFLQH =52fW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 21:44:41 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from level3.dynacom.net (level3.dynacom.net [206.107.213.213]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 572E637B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 21:44:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kstewart@urx.com) Received: (qmail 30002 invoked by uid 0); 12 Mar 2001 05:44:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO urx.com) (206.159.132.160) by mail.urx.com with SMTP; 12 Mar 2001 05:44:37 -0000 Message-ID: <3AAC6245.5BDBDB72@urx.com> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 21:44:37 -0800 From: Kent Stewart Reply-To: kstewart@urx.com Organization: Dynacom X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: z thompson Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kde2 install problems References: <01031122363101.49549@Nero> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG The way I read that your port tree is way out of date. I think you need to cvsup update your ports. Kent z thompson wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > I have been trying to install kde2 for the last week or so with no success. It > keeps failing on the build of kdesupport2 with the error: > > configure: error: Qt (>= Qt 2.2.2) (libraries) not found. Please check your installation! > For more details about this problem, look at the end of config.log. > > I have looked at the config.log in kdesupport2 as it says and find only this: > > configure: failed program was: > #include "confdefs.h" > #include > #include > #include > #include > #include > #include > #include > #include > #if ! (QT_VERSION >= 222) > #error 1 > #endif > > int main() { > QStringList *t = new QStringList(); > QIconView iv(0); > iv.setWordWrapIconText(false); > QString s; > s.setLatin1("Elvis is alive", 14); > int magnolia = QEvent::Speech; /* new in 2.2 beta2 */ > return 0; > > I have installed qt-2.2.4 before trying the make of kde2 and I have tried > letting the make of kde2 install it and in both cases it fails with this error. > How is it determining the QT version and why isn't the correct version being > recognized? Can anyone help me out on this? > > Thanks, > > Zach Thompson > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: PGP 6.5.8 > > iQA/AwUBOqxgYpCjAI4/vZatEQJ3FACgu8JIaN87b1Zod3bwlT/squ57kasAniyN > M5SL7hW0gCCntua8MNQsFLQH > =52fW > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA mailto:kbstew99@hotmail.com http://kstewart.urx.com/kstewart/index.html FreeBSD News http://daily.daemonnews.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 21:48: 9 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from camelot.bitart.com (BITart-45.BITart.com [206.103.221.45]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A190D37B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 21:48:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gerti@bitart.com) Received: (qmail 6937 invoked by uid 101); 12 Mar 2001 05:48:04 -0000 Message-ID: <20010312054804.6936.qmail@camelot.bitart.com> Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 (NeXT Mail 4.2mach v148) In-Reply-To: <01031122363101.49549@Nero> X-Nextstep-Mailer: Mail 4.2mach (Enhance 2.2p1) Received: by NeXT.Mailer (1.148) From: Gerd Knops Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 23:48:03 -0600 To: z thompson Subject: Re: kde2 install problems Cc: questions@freebsd.org Reply-To: gerti-freebsdq@BITart.com References: <01031122363101.49549@Nero> Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG z thompson wrote: > > I have been trying to install kde2 for the last week or so with no > success. It keeps failing on the build of kdesupport2 with the error: > > configure: error: Qt (>= Qt 2.2.2) (libraries) not found. Please > check your installation! For more details about this problem, look at > the end of config.log. > Same here. I guess you have X 4.02 installed, and I understand the problem is the X now uses multi-threading. You can get kde2 compiled with 'make install CXXFLAGS="-pthread -D_THREAD_SAFE"', but even though that works KDE will hang during startup. I think Will (will@FreeBSD.org) is working on it, so let's hope he can figure it out soon (BTW let's thank Will for his ongoing KDE2 support, seems nobody else wants to touch it). Gerd To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 21:49:17 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from camelot.bitart.com (BITart-45.BITart.com [206.103.221.45]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9AA6637B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 21:49:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gerti@bitart.com) Received: (qmail 6941 invoked by uid 101); 12 Mar 2001 05:49:10 -0000 Message-ID: <20010312054910.6940.qmail@camelot.bitart.com> Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 (NeXT Mail 4.2mach v148) In-Reply-To: <3AAC6245.5BDBDB72@urx.com> X-Nextstep-Mailer: Mail 4.2mach (Enhance 2.2p1) Received: by NeXT.Mailer (1.148) From: Gerd Knops Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 23:49:10 -0600 To: kstewart@urx.com Subject: Re: kde2 install problems Cc: z thompson , questions@freebsd.org Reply-To: gerti-freebsdq@BITart.com References: <01031122363101.49549@Nero> <3AAC6245.5BDBDB72@urx.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Kent Stewart wrote: > The way I read that your port tree is way out of date. I think you > need to cvsup update your ports. > I have the same here, I understand it has to do with X 4.02 multi-threading. Ports are up to date. Gerd > Kent > > z thompson wrote: > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > I have been trying to install kde2 for the last week or so with no > > success. It keeps failing on the build of kdesupport2 with the > > error: > > > > configure: error: Qt (>= Qt 2.2.2) (libraries) not found. Please > > check your installation! For more details about this problem, look > > at the end of config.log. > > > > I have looked at the config.log in kdesupport2 as it says and find > > only this: > > > > configure: failed program was: > > #include "confdefs.h" > > #include > > #include > > #include > > #include > > #include > > #include > > #include > > #include > > #if ! (QT_VERSION >= 222) > > #error 1 > > #endif > > > > int main() { > > QStringList *t = new QStringList(); > > QIconView iv(0); > > iv.setWordWrapIconText(false); > > QString s; > > s.setLatin1("Elvis is alive", 14); > > int magnolia = QEvent::Speech; /* new in 2.2 beta2 */ > > return 0; > > > > I have installed qt-2.2.4 before trying the make of kde2 and I have > > tried letting the make of kde2 install it and in both cases it > > fails with this error. How is it determining the QT version and why > > isn't the correct version being recognized? Can anyone help me out > > on this? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Zach Thompson > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > Version: PGP 6.5.8 > > > > iQA/AwUBOqxgYpCjAI4/vZatEQJ3FACgu8JIaN87b1Zod3bwlT/squ57kasAniyN > > M5SL7hW0gCCntua8MNQsFLQH > > =52fW > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > > -- > Kent Stewart > Richland, WA > > FreeBSD News > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 21:49:21 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mail.nbrewer.com (sparge.nbrewer.com [208.42.68.70]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D82637B71A for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 21:49:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris@nbrewer.com) Received: by mail.nbrewer.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1DEE5383071; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 23:49:17 -0600 (CST) Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 23:49:16 -0600 From: Christopher Farley To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: split bug? Message-ID: <20010311234915.A78116@northernbrewer.com> Mail-Followup-To: Christopher Farley , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Organization: Northern Brewer, St. Paul, MN Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I've been trying to split a large binary file using split(1). Are there any caveats pertaining to the use of split with binary files? I searched around, but could only find encouraging information... Anyway, here's my problem specifically: I've got a large gzipped file, and I split it like so: # split -b 660m myfile.gz The four resulting files (xaa, xab, xac, xad) cannot be reassembled to create the original gzipped file. # cat xaa xab xac xad | diff seward-dump.gz - Binary files seward-dump.gz and - differ Is this a bug, or user error? :) -- Christopher Farley www.northernbrewer.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 21:51:23 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from chmod.ath.cx (CC2-1242.charter-stl.com [24.217.116.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4834437B719 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 21:51:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ajh3@chmod.ath.cx) Received: by chmod.ath.cx (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 24AA3A82A; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 23:50:54 -0600 (CST) Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 23:50:54 -0600 From: Andrew Hesford To: BSD Blood Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sendmail vs other MTAs Message-ID: <20010311235053.A45379@cec.wustl.edu> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from bsdblood@hotmail.com on Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 03:50:17AM -0000 X-Loop: Andrew Hesford Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I use Postfix. I'm not really sure why, but it might be because the guys in #FreeBSD/irc.openproject.net recommend it. Configuration is definitely easier than with Sendmail. However, the easiest server I've ever configured was Exim. That's worth a look if ease of use is your primary concern. The Postfix overview (at www.postfix.org) says that Postfix is a direct competitor to qmail (he makes a point of saying competitor, not enemy), with its primary goals being speed, security and ease of use. An interesting feature of postfix is that it is actually composed of many different daemons. For example, one manages the queue, another smtp connections and data transfer, one to deliver mail, and some others. I imagine this results in a performance increase, since various parts of the mail system can be parallelized. However, if you have a really large mail system, you might need the FreeBSD kernel to allow more running processes at one time. I think one advantage of Postfix is that it runs well in a distributed mail system, although I wouldn't know, because I only have a single server. On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 03:50:17AM -0000, BSD Blood wrote: > Hello. I've been using FreeBSD for 4 months. What are your opinions on > sendmail compared to the other MTAs like postfix,qmail, etc. on FreeBSD. > Which one is more stable, easy to configure, secure, etc. ? I need to decide > which one to use as my SMTP server. I have little experience with sendmail, > but I don't really like it because I find it too difficult to configure and > there are just too much documentation to read. -- Andrew Hesford ajh3@chmod.ath.cx To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 22: 1:15 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mailhost01.reflexnet.net (mailhost01.reflexnet.net [64.6.192.82]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ECCC37B71B for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:01:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cjc@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflexcom.com) Received: from rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflexcom.com ([216.196.73.168]) by mailhost01.reflexnet.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.197.19); Sun, 11 Mar 2001 21:57:39 -0800 Received: (from cjc@localhost) by rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflexcom.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f2C5xfl94258; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 21:59:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cjc) Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 21:59:28 -0800 From: "Crist J. Clark" To: Doug Young Cc: Michael Conlen , Matthew Rudderham , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: What Are Standard Procedures For System Backup Message-ID: <20010311215927.P50418@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflex> Reply-To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu References: <022501c0aa4d$a96a65e0$0200a8c0@apana.org.au> <20010311172203.K50418@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflex> <003b01c0aab4$400553a0$847e03cb@apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <003b01c0aab4$400553a0$847e03cb@apana.org.au>; from dougy@bryden.apana.org.au on Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 03:20:40PM +1000 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 03:20:40PM +1000, Doug Young wrote: > Thanks ... makes at least part of it a bit clearer than the awful man page. > > I think I understand the purpose of that "-0af", & "path to dump file" looks > like its sorta like /backup (assuming its a local partition) ?? The useage > of "filesystem" here is not clear however ... man filesystem doesn't tell > me anything A filesystem is a rather basic concept in the operating system. Anything you use mount(8) to access is going to be a filesystem. Just type, $ mount To see your currently mounted filesystems. Anyone one of those which is a ufs type is a candidate for using dump(8) on. If you 'apropos filesystem,' you'll get a lot more info than you probably need. > > I am not sure what you can't find in the docs. > > The docs don't provide info in an intelligible format on exactly how to use > "dump" > I get TOTALLY confused with the extremely obtuse synopsis stuff in most man > pages, (man ppp is a notable exception) as do many others of my > acquaintance. > Thankfully there are usable explanations of many things at one of the > user-friendly > sites like freebsddiary / bsdvault / lnova / etc, but unfortunately there > doesn't appear > to be any articles on dump / restore. I guess the the format of official > docs is > meaningful to experts, but many other users have extreme difficulty making > any > sense out of them. Many others have asked the same thing previously, but > here we > go again. Why can't we have some "step_by_step" explanations & sample usage > rather than that impossibly vague synopsis stuff ?? Manpages are meant to be synopsis stuff for the clued or expert user to use for quick, brief references. They are not, generally, designed to be how-to's or tutorials (that's not to say some are not written to be, vinum(4,8), the Perl pages, shell pages, can be quite complete). Like you state, freebsddiary, bsdvault, etc. are resources for tutorials and more real examples. -- Crist J. Clark cjclark@alum.mit.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 22: 3:45 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mail.nbrewer.com (sparge.nbrewer.com [208.42.68.70]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 083AB37B719 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:03:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris@nbrewer.com) Received: by mail.nbrewer.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5D3B0383071; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 00:03:42 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 00:03:42 -0600 From: Christopher Farley To: eric Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Update port Message-ID: <20010312000340.B78116@northernbrewer.com> Mail-Followup-To: Christopher Farley , eric , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200103120251.f2C2pa962446@dsns.csie.nctu.edu.tw> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200103120251.f2C2pa962446@dsns.csie.nctu.edu.tw>; from eric@dsns.csie.nctu.edu.tw on Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 10:51:36AM +0800 Organization: Northern Brewer, St. Paul, MN Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG eric (eric@dsns.csie.nctu.edu.tw) wrote: > I'm newbie in FreeBSD > Would someone tell me please how to update my port collection ? You will need to install /usr/ports/net/cvsup cvsup synchronizes your ports tree with the main server (or mirror). A sample supfile is located in /usr/share/examples/cvsup. Also, the handbook covers cvsup pretty well: http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/synching.html Finally, if you are trying to synchronize your ports from a FreeBSD 4.0 or 4.1 machine, you will need to install an upgrade kit at www.freebsd.org/ports It appears as if the new recommendation for pre-4.0 users is to upgrade the OS! -- Christopher Farley www.northernbrewer.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 22:12:57 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mail.viasoft.com.cn (unknown [61.153.1.177]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACABF37B71C for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:12:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsddiy@21cn.com) Received: from William ([192.168.1.98]) by mail.viasoft.com.cn (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA15490; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 12:53:01 +0800 Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 13:03:13 +0800 From: David Xu X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.48f) Personal Reply-To: David Xu Organization: Viasoft X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <14615475031.20010312130313@viasoft.com.cn> To: "c. schindler" Cc: Kris Kennaway , Julian Bolivar , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re[2]: FreeBSD 4.3 Release... In-reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG cs> what are the differences between this version (4.3) and the previous? cs> ---------- cs> chris ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/.0/FreeBSD/releases/i386/4.3-BETA/RELNOTES.TXT -- David Xu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 22:15:57 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [206.29.169.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED63437B718; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:15:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedm.placo.com (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [206.29.168.154]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f2C6FhN14548; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:15:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Alexey Koptsevich" , "Poul-Henning Kamp" Cc: Subject: RE: bad144 Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:15:43 -0800 Message-ID: <005301c0aabb$de4453c0$1401a8c0@tedm.placo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi Alexey If you ever see a bad block from a modern IDE or SCSI disk that is permanent (ie: rebooting doesen't clear it) then there's something wrong with the drive electronics. Modern disks automagically and silently remap bad sectors on the fly. bad144 doesen't work with LBA disks, just CHS, and the only thing that uses the bad block table that bad144 wrote out is the old wd driver which has been replaced by the atapi driver. If your paranoid then if your attempting to verify a SCSI disk, you can use scsicontrol (camcontrol) to issue a SCSI format command to the disk. If your paranoid and running IDE (which if your that concerned with data integrity you wouldn't be running IDE) and you want to verify it, then boot the system with a bootable DOS floppy and run the appropriate "low-level" formatting and verification tool from the drive's manufacturer. Ted Mittelstaedt tedm@toybox.placo.com Author of: The FreeBSD Corporate Networker's Guide Book website: http://www.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Alexey >Koptsevich >Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2001 8:54 AM >To: Poul-Henning Kamp >Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG >Subject: bad144 > > > >Hello Poul-Henning, > >May I ask what was the reason for removing bad144 from 4.x? It seems to me >it was quite useful utility in many cases. E.g., I temporarily move data >from failed drive to another one and I want to know immediately are there >bad blocks on the replacement drive or not. Why should I rely upon >capability of modern drives to remap bad blocks? Or should I store 3.x >somewhere just for this purpose? > >Is it possible to get bad144 back? > >Yours, >Alex > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 22:18:10 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from bryden.apana.org.au (bryden.apana.org.au [203.3.126.129]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F58137B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:18:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dougy@bryden.apana.org.au) Received: from roadrunner (roadrunner.apana.org.au [203.3.126.132]) by bryden.apana.org.au (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f2C6HUq00564; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 16:17:32 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from dougy@bryden.apana.org.au) Message-ID: <008301c0aabc$443e96e0$847e03cb@apana.org.au> From: "Doug Young" To: Cc: "Michael Conlen" , "Matthew Rudderham" , References: <022501c0aa4d$a96a65e0$0200a8c0@apana.org.au> <20010311172203.K50418@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflex> <003b01c0aab4$400553a0$847e03cb@apana.org.au> <20010311215927.P50418@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflex> Subject: Re: What Are Standard Procedures For System Backup Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 16:18:29 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > A filesystem is a rather basic concept in the operating > system. Anything you use mount(8) to access is going to be a > filesystem. Just type, > > $ mount OK ... so if I'm understand that correctly the /dev/da0s1a /root /dev/da0s1e /usr /dev/da0s1f /var constitute three different "filesystems" ?? I gather that I need to dump each of them individually ... does it matter whether I address the "filesystem" as, for example, "/dev/da0s1a" or alternatively as "/" ?? > > To see your currently mounted filesystems. Anyone one of those which > is a ufs type is a candidate for using dump(8) on. > > If you 'apropos filesystem,' you'll get a lot more info than you > probably need. Just looked at that & agree totally .... looks like martian or something :) > > Manpages are meant to be synopsis stuff for the clued or expert user > to use for quick, brief references. They are not, generally, designed > to be how-to's or tutorials (that's not to say some are not written to > be, vinum(4,8), the Perl pages, shell pages, can be quite > complete). Like you state, freebsddiary, bsdvault, etc. are resources > for tutorials and more real examples. At least some gurus who write documentation have some idea of making the stuff halfway intelligible ... Brian Somers doesn't have that problem & Greg Lehey generally writes intelligibly but many of the others certainly aim only at others of their own level. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 22:18:38 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from scaup.prod.itd.earthlink.net (scaup.prod.itd.earthlink.net [207.217.121.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 661A937B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:18:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cublai@earthlink.net) Received: from earthlink.net (1Cust108.tnt1.longmont.co.da.uu.net [63.29.61.108]) by scaup.prod.itd.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA24750; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:18:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3AAC6A3E.2010605@earthlink.net> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 23:18:38 -0700 From: Zach Thompson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.3-BETA i386; en-US; 0.8) Gecko/20010311 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: kstewart@urx.com Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kde2 install problems References: <01031122363101.49549@Nero> <3AAC6245.5BDBDB72@urx.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Kent Stewart wrote: > The way I read that your port tree is way out of date. I think you > need to cvsup update your ports. > > Kent > I thought this might be the case the first time it happened as well. But I removed all of distfiles, cvsuped ports, and did a make today (3/11/01). So an out of date ports tree seems unlikely, no? In fact, each time this has failed I have checked to see if any updates had been made. Zach To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 22:22:39 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from cet.cet.com (cet.cet.com [206.96.91.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F16C37B71A for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:22:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from clintm@cet.com) Received: from clint (clintm-dsl-1-160-3.cet.com [198.202.29.244]) by cet.cet.com with SMTP id WAA10430; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:25:44 -0800 Message-ID: <012201c0aabc$e352c580$0264000a@helter.org> From: "Clint Martin" To: "Alex Toushek" Cc: "FreeBSD Questions" References: Subject: Re: Secure user dirs Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:23:00 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG yes, if you have all the users being members of the same user group, e.g: USERS.. you can do something like this: chmod 701 /home/* chmod 704 /home//public_html/* This will give each user's main directory permissions like: RWX-----X wich will allow them FULL access to everything in thier own directories.. it will restrict other members of the USERS group (or whatever) from accessing anything in the directory (they won't even be able to chdir into it..) and it will allow all other users/people NOT in the USERS group to be able to CHDIR into, but not read anything.. (they won't even be able to "ls" the directory..) the 704 permissions on each individual ./public_html/ directory is so that APACHE, (or whatever you use as a server) will be able to SCAN the public_html directory.. it technically doesn't have to be able to, but it may be nice for it to.. Clint ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alex Toushek" To: Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2001 9:11 PM Subject: Secure user dirs > Is there an easy way to lock other users out of dirs? ie. to keep other > users from looking at the contents or downloading the contents of other > users apache htdocs files but still give apache access to serve the pages? > This is on a webserver that multiple people have access to pretty much > everyone's dirs. Which is very bad I just want to try and lock them into > their own dir or lock access out of other users dirs. I have played with > file permissons with no success. > > Alex > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 22:22:44 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mail.nbrewer.com (sparge.nbrewer.com [208.42.68.70]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6997E37B719 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:22:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris@nbrewer.com) Received: by mail.nbrewer.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A34E6383071; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 00:22:40 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 00:22:40 -0600 From: Christopher Farley To: Andrew Hesford Cc: BSD Blood , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sendmail vs other MTAs Message-ID: <20010312002238.C78116@northernbrewer.com> Mail-Followup-To: Christopher Farley , Andrew Hesford , BSD Blood , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20010311235053.A45379@cec.wustl.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010311235053.A45379@cec.wustl.edu>; from ajh3@chmod.ath.cx on Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 11:50:54PM -0600 Organization: Northern Brewer, St. Paul, MN Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Andrew Hesford (ajh3@chmod.ath.cx) wrote: > I use Postfix. I'm not really sure why, but it might be because the guys > in #FreeBSD/irc.openproject.net recommend it. I second the Postfix recommendation. I cannot compare it to Exim or qmail, because I've never used those (although qmail supporters tend to be extremely enthusiastic, so it must have something going for it). Compared to sendmail, postfix is easier-to-configure, relatively secure by default, and faster. I am not sure that sendmail has any advantages for users without legacy issues. NetBSD now provides Postfix as part of their standard distribution, which is something I wish the FreeBSD developers would consider! -- Christopher Farley www.northernbrewer.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 22:24:16 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from cet.cet.com (cet.cet.com [206.96.91.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49B7837B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:24:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from clintm@cet.com) Received: from clint (clintm-dsl-1-160-3.cet.com [198.202.29.244]) by cet.cet.com with SMTP id WAA10530 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:27:22 -0800 Message-ID: <012801c0aabd$1e05a080$0264000a@helter.org> From: "Clint Martin" To: "FreeBSD Questions" References: <012201c0aabc$e352c580$0264000a@helter.org> Subject: Re: Secure user dirs Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:24:39 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Opps.. the second CHMOD command below should be: chmod 704 /home//public_html my apologies Clint ----- Original Message ----- From: "Clint Martin" To: "Alex Toushek" Cc: "FreeBSD Questions" Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2001 10:23 PM Subject: Re: Secure user dirs > yes, if you have all the users being members of the same user group, e.g: > USERS.. you can do something like this: > > chmod 701 /home/* > chmod 704 /home//public_html/* > > > This will give each user's main directory permissions like: RWX-----X > wich will allow them FULL access to everything in thier own directories.. it > will restrict other members of the USERS group (or whatever) from accessing > anything in the directory (they won't even be able to chdir into it..) and > it will allow all other users/people NOT in the USERS group to be able to > CHDIR into, but not read anything.. (they won't even be able to "ls" the > directory..) > the 704 permissions on each individual ./public_html/ directory is so that > APACHE, (or whatever you use as a server) will be able to SCAN the > public_html directory.. it technically doesn't have to be able to, but it > may be nice for it to.. > > > Clint > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Alex Toushek" > To: > Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2001 9:11 PM > Subject: Secure user dirs > > > > Is there an easy way to lock other users out of dirs? ie. to keep other > > users from looking at the contents or downloading the contents of other > > users apache htdocs files but still give apache access to serve the pages? > > This is on a webserver that multiple people have access to pretty much > > everyone's dirs. Which is very bad I just want to try and lock them into > > their own dir or lock access out of other users dirs. I have played with > > file permissons with no success. > > > > Alex > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 22:27:11 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from bryden.apana.org.au (bryden.apana.org.au [203.3.126.129]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7319937B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:27:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dougy@bryden.apana.org.au) Received: from roadrunner (roadrunner.apana.org.au [203.3.126.132]) by bryden.apana.org.au (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f2C6R2q00610 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 16:27:03 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from dougy@bryden.apana.org.au) Message-ID: <009701c0aabd$9758e460$847e03cb@apana.org.au> From: "Doug Young" To: Subject: SSH issue Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 16:28:00 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG What would cause SSH to apparently die after a reboot of a remote 4.2 box ?? Its been working fine up to now & I'm not aware of any significant events that would have given the box a fright. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 22:28: 3 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from swan.prod.itd.earthlink.net (swan.prod.itd.earthlink.net [207.217.120.123]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBF2937B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:28:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cublai@earthlink.net) Received: from earthlink.net (1Cust108.tnt1.longmont.co.da.uu.net [63.29.61.108]) by swan.prod.itd.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA05637; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:27:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3AAC6C74.6050801@earthlink.net> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 23:28:04 -0700 From: Zach Thompson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.3-BETA i386; en-US; 0.8) Gecko/20010311 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gerti-freebsdq@BITart.com Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kde2 install problems References: <01031122363101.49549@Nero> <20010312054804.6936.qmail@camelot.bitart.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Gerd Knops wrote: > z thompson wrote: > >> I have been trying to install kde2 for the last week or so with no >> success. It keeps failing on the build of kdesupport2 with the error: >> >> configure: error: Qt (>= Qt 2.2.2) (libraries) not found. Please >> check your installation! For more details about this problem, look at >> the end of config.log. >> > Same here. I guess you have X 4.02 installed, and I understand the > problem is the X now uses multi-threading. You can get kde2 compiled > with 'make install CXXFLAGS="-pthread -D_THREAD_SAFE"', but even though > that works KDE will hang during startup. I think Will > (will@FreeBSD.org) is working on it, so let's hope he can figure it out > soon (BTW let's thank Will for his ongoing KDE2 support, seems nobody > else wants to touch it). So it's possible I'm not a complete idiot. That's odd, I tried installing it with X 3.3.6 and got the error that I needed 4.0.2_6, so I installed 4.0.2. Well I hope that's it because I must have tried this 7-8 times removing all of X and everything kde depends on. But there was a post of someone uninstalling and reinstalling X, Mesa, then Qt and getting kde to work. Zach To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 22:31:43 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from wantadilla.lemis.com (wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.80]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B50F37B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:31:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: by wantadilla.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 140686A918; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 17:01:36 +1030 (CST) Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 17:01:36 +1030 From: Greg Lehey To: Sam van Ratt Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Vinum-ccd and 4 IDE drives Message-ID: <20010312170136.B11986@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <4.2.0.58.20010312072334.00a432c0@pop.gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.20010312072334.00a432c0@pop.gmx.net>; from sam.vanratt@gmx.net on Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 07:29:57AM +0100 Organization: LEMIS, PO Box 460, Echunga SA 5153, Australia Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.lemis.com/~grog X-PGP-Fingerprint: 6B 7B C3 8C 61 CD 54 AF 13 24 52 F8 6D A4 95 EF Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Monday, 12 March 2001 at 7:29:57 +0100, Sam van Ratt wrote: > At 05:19 12.03.01 +0100, Schmalzbauer, Harald wrote: >> >> I'm having a serious problem with vinum and ccd. I have four 80GB drives >> connected to a supermicro 370DER. I can do a newfs on each drive at the same >> time without any problems, but trying to build a stripeset causes the >> machine to hang horribly. >> >> >> What am I doing wrong? > > Using IDE? ;-) > > No for sure, I'm using 12 75GB IBM disks in a NAS proto type and > having quite the same, but it didn't really hang but took about one > hour before something really happens. Meanwhile I could log in on ttyx. > Using 5 72gb (I couldn't afford more) SCSI is working great. So I'm > pretty sure it's IDE. (vinum with RAID4 or 5) There's no reason why it shouldn't work with IDE, but if you can reproduce it with IDE and not with SCSI, it would point at the IDE driver (not the hardware, I suspect). Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. If you don't, I may ignore the reply. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 22:34:25 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-59.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.59]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7CBC37B71B for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:34:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 03C0766BD5; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:34:18 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:34:18 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Doug Young Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SSH issue Message-ID: <20010311223418.A28355@mollari.cthul.hu> References: <009701c0aabd$9758e460$847e03cb@apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <009701c0aabd$9758e460$847e03cb@apana.org.au>; from dougy@bryden.apana.org.au on Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 04:28:00PM +1000 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 04:28:00PM +1000, Doug Young wrote: > What would cause SSH to apparently die after a reboot of a remote 4.2 box ?? > Its been working fine up to now & I'm not aware of any significant events > that > would have given the box a fright. Did you recently upgrade that box, and forget to run mergemaster? Kris --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6rG3qWry0BWjoQKURAi+LAKCkzUU2xN4XwoFqd2Oad1DyL96+jQCfcZ4K snPLV8AVbJhhjA7GsSvmCdk= =45aF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 22:35:13 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from smtp-server1.tampabay.rr.com (smtp-server1.tampabay.rr.com [65.32.1.34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC9F137B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:35:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from meconlen@obfuscated.net) Received: from clarity (24129168hfc216.tampabay.rr.com [24.129.168.216]) by smtp-server1.tampabay.rr.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with SMTP id f2C4kf029653; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 23:46:41 -0500 (EST) From: "Michael Conlen" To: "Duraid" , "Tony Storm" , Subject: RE: Linux or FreeBSD Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 23:41:05 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <3AAC4830.48EE984E@home.com> x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG there are a few other reasons to go with FreeBSD. My biggest complaint about the Linux kernel is the networking stack. It seems to be Alan Cox's playground. Now, I've got a lot of respect for Alan, but using the Linux kernel as his playground results in a much less stable operating system. I think the last time that happened with FreeBSD was the 3.x series. I recall there were some network problems introduced there when some things in the networking stack was reworked a bit, but Alan has a thing for ripping the thing out and rebuilding it over and over again (what's he on, this third one). In any case FreeBSD is based on BSD, and is much more stable. Granted stable is a relative thing, but I've seen much less problems with FreeBSD under heavy usage then I have with Linux at different points in it's cycle. Duraid is correct about the different flavors of Linux, but BSD has their own (NetBSD, FreeBSD, BSDI). On the other hand, things are a lot less different between the BSD's then they are between the various Linux distributions. As always, for any application, get a firm understanding of your appplications requirements, and examine what FreeBSD or a flavor of Linux has to offer. Think about what you will do with it, what you will do a year from now, five years from now. Did I mention how easy it is to upgrade FreeBSD? I used to be a Linux freak. My old slackware distributions blew Windows 3.11 out of the water. More recently I saw FreeBSD, I'm not going back. -- Groove On Dude Michael Conlen Obfuscated Networking meconlen@obfuscated.net > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Duraid > Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2001 10:53 PM > To: Tony Storm; freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: Linux or FreeBSD > > > go with freebsd .. when you ask questions you only get one answer.. > linux is not like that .. when you ask a linux question everybody goes > ...oh well! it depends... not because they don't want to help but this > is the truth ... linux comes with different flavors and gives different > solutions to different problems... and this is very confusing to a > newbie... even if would like to choose linux don't go with redhat > because you won't understand why all the fuss around linux.. it's not > REALLY stable and not easy to use and with ton's of bugs.. why not use > windows then?.. go with slackware (slackware.com). > > Duraid > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 22:45: 3 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mailhost01.reflexnet.net (mailhost01.reflexnet.net [64.6.192.82]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7E5537B719 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:44:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cjc@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflexcom.com) Received: from rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflexcom.com ([216.196.73.168]) by mailhost01.reflexnet.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.197.19); Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:42:39 -0800 Received: (from cjc@localhost) by rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflexcom.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f2C6idp94720; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:44:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cjc) Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:44:35 -0800 From: "Crist J. Clark" To: Doug Young Cc: Michael Conlen , Matthew Rudderham , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: What Are Standard Procedures For System Backup Message-ID: <20010311224435.Q50418@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflex> Reply-To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu References: <022501c0aa4d$a96a65e0$0200a8c0@apana.org.au> <20010311172203.K50418@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflex> <003b01c0aab4$400553a0$847e03cb@apana.org.au> <20010311215927.P50418@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflex> <008301c0aabc$443e96e0$847e03cb@apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <008301c0aabc$443e96e0$847e03cb@apana.org.au>; from dougy@bryden.apana.org.au on Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 04:18:29PM +1000 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 04:18:29PM +1000, Doug Young wrote: > > A filesystem is a rather basic concept in the operating > > system. Anything you use mount(8) to access is going to be a > > filesystem. Just type, > > > > $ mount > > OK ... so if I'm understand that correctly the > /dev/da0s1a /root ITYM, /dev/da0s1a / > /dev/da0s1e /usr > /dev/da0s1f /var > > constitute three different "filesystems" ?? Yes. No need to use quotes. These are three completely independent filesystems. > I gather that I need to dump each of them individually ... Yes. Like I said, they are each independent objects. > does it matter > whether I address the "filesystem" as, for example, "/dev/da0s1a" or > alternatively as "/" ? Not as long as the two entries match in /etc/fstab. You can always use a device name, a mount point is mapped to a device node using fstab(5). -- Crist J. Clark cjclark@alum.mit.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 22:51:24 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from bryden.apana.org.au (bryden.apana.org.au [203.3.126.129]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BF9637B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:51:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dougy@bryden.apana.org.au) Received: from roadrunner (roadrunner.apana.org.au [203.3.126.132]) by bryden.apana.org.au (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f2C6p4q00731; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 16:51:05 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from dougy@bryden.apana.org.au) Message-ID: <010001c0aac0$f4116f80$847e03cb@apana.org.au> From: "Doug Young" To: "Kris Kennaway" Cc: References: <009701c0aabd$9758e460$847e03cb@apana.org.au> <20010311223418.A28355@mollari.cthul.hu> Subject: Re: SSH issue Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 16:52:02 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 04:28:00PM +1000, Doug Young wrote: > What would cause SSH to apparently die after a reboot of a remote 4.2 box ?? > Its been working fine up to now & I'm not aware of any significant events > that would have given the box a fright. Did you recently upgrade that box, and forget to run mergemaster? No ... it was left doing a buildworld but the first time we noticed that ssh had died was after getting back home (the box is colocated at our upstream provider in the city). I wouldn't have thought that the buildworld would cause trouble though .... its not as if its got to installing yet (I'll go do that stuff in person) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 23: 0: 9 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mss.rdc2.nsw.optushome.com.au (ha1.rdc2.nsw.optushome.com.au [203.164.2.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4172037B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 23:00:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from melange@n12turbo.com) Received: from roy ([203.164.69.217]) by mss.rdc2.nsw.optushome.com.au (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with SMTP id <20010312070005.XNWD15800.mss.rdc2.nsw.optushome.com.au@roy> for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 18:00:05 +1100 Message-ID: <004f01c0aac2$3d886460$0216a8c0@eburwd1.vic.optushome.com.au> From: "Tarragon Allen" To: Subject: new install partitioning problem Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 18:01:19 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi I've just purchased a 45gb IBM hard drive. I have decided to try out FreeBSD 4.2 . Presently I have a 5gb FAT32 partition at the start of the disk for Win98SE (so I can dual-boot and play games sometimes). I have dedicated the remainder of the drive to FreeBSD. My problem is this: I can boot the FreeBSD install floppies, and it gets to the part where you have to divide up the FreeBSD slice into seperate partitions. If I tell it to auto-create, all is fine except that I don't particularly like having a root partition of 20mb, or a /var partition of 50mb - so I decided to delete those automatic partitons and create a table thus (38gb free on disk): 5000mb FAT32 1024mb / 512mb (swap) 2048mb /var 512mb /tmp 10480mb /usr 19000mb /home (the last figure is approximate, the aim was to allocate the remainder of the disk to /home). I can create all these partitions fine, except the last one, which always complains about "Can't create partition, too large?". I can create the last partition if I leave about 2 gb at the end of the disk, but this is unacceptable to me. Can someone explain why it won't let me use the entirety of the disk if I partition it manually, yet it is quite happy to use the whole disk if it does it automatically? Frustrated, t To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 23: 0:49 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from edwin.mounet.com (edwin.mounet.com [216.145.76.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 43F2B37B71A for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 23:00:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hornback@wireco.net) Received: (qmail 25665 invoked by uid 0); 12 Mar 2001 06:45:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO eagle) (216.145.70.47) by mounet.com with SMTP; 12 Mar 2001 06:45:28 -0000 From: "Andrew C. Hornback" To: "Danny Pansters" Cc: Subject: RE: FreeBSD server Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 01:59:53 -0500 Message-ID: <026301c0aac2$0a7745a0$0f00000a@eagle> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 In-Reply-To: <01030915130600.12281@ricin.localnet> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of > Danny Pansters > Sent: Friday, March 09, 2001 9:13 AM > To: Kondie > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: FreeBSD server > > How about a 500MHz or so processor with 256 or 512 Megs of > RAM... much > more logical than a 1000MHz/128MB combination which is > rediculously out > of balance IMHO. I'm in agreement here. A server needs to keep a lot of things in memory as opposed to paging them out to the drive... it increases response times dramatically. The only times, in my opinion, that you server needs a "mega processor" is if you're going to be doing back office work on it (i.e. database serving and things of that nature). Processor speed really depends on what applications you're running. But, a must for any good server, in my mind, is high speed I/O. The longer it takes for data to get from the server's drive to your workstation, the less productive you can be. > Also, I'd consider having two disks so you can backup > semi-continuously > if you like or mirror the data (=raid1, my thought would be > you'd like > to mirror /var on a unix emailserver). People don't like > losing their > email should your disk crash. Even SCSI disk aren't that expensive > anymore. Personally, I have a strong preference for Seagate disks. > Anyway, remember what you're going to do is all about I/O, not > processor power. If you ask me, 50000 emails a day could even be > handled on a relatively old Pentium desktop box. Don't be > cheap on your > network controller(s). Get 3Com or something. When it comes to server hardware, don't be cheap on anything. A system is only as strong as it's weakest link. When it comes to drives, Seagate is good, but I'm preferential to IBM... (having a shop full of working PS/2 hardware from nearly 15 years ago is a testament to how well IBM stuff is built) In the realm of networking equipment, it's SMC all the time, every time. Given the scenario of 50,000 e-mails a day, I did some brief calculations. If you assume that each message is 3k in length, and that 1% of the e-mails has a 1 Meg attachment, you end up with a total daily bandwidth load of nearly 650 Megs. If this is sent in an evenly distributed load over 24 hours, you end up with an average of 75kB/sec going into the machine, which could certainly be handled by nearly any platform that FreeBSD is capable of being installed on, if that is the machine's only purpose. > I can't comment on Compaq because I don't use them (oops > that implies > something already ;-) No seriously, I know that their > consumer products > are crap but their servers are likely to be a very > different story. Their consumer products do have questionable quality (as seen by all of the AMD based boxes that they had to buy back because of multiple failures back in 99), but their professional/corporate grade hardware is impeccable. I have a couple of machines back in the shop that were originally DeskPro 386-20 MHz machines that were upgraded with a motherboard replacement to low end Pentium status, the rest of the internals remain, and they run as solidly now as they did the day they were made. When it comes to servers, I am thoroughly impressed with Compaq. As chronicled here on the list, I am currently working with a ProLiant 1500 machine (dual Pentium 133, 64 Megs, using the Compaq SMART2/P RAID controller with the onboard SCSI setup) It runs like a top, faster than my PII-450... There are still a few issues with nit-picky things, but on a whole, it's a joy to work with ('course, I'm biased since I love working with server hardware anyway, it's much better built than your average desktop system) > I > know they have a good reputation and that some of their public test > server boxes run fBSD. I've only worked with a Compaq > server once and > had to install Linux on it at work... had some hardware > problems then > notably with the keyboard(!) I hear that. I made the mistake of getting an international version of the Compaq keyboard for this machine, and it didn't like it one bit. Stick a commodity PS/2 keyboard on it, and all was well again. > Don't be surprised. Bulky motherboards with all sorts of integrated > on-board stuff can be like that. I'm currently setting up a > server box > based on an AOpen DX34plus board. fBSD floppy/cd would not boot at > first, I had to turn off the USB controller in its BIOS, > default jumper > settings for processor type turned out to be wrongly > documented, ... > stuff like that just happens I reckon. In your case, why > not build your > own box starting with a nice AOpen oer Asus mother board? I would think a better solution would be purchasing an "Old Reliable" server, doing a little reconditioning and going from there. When you start using commodity hardware to build a server, you are destined to run into problems. Also, from personal experience, AOpen has been questionable... Asus is a good motherboard manufacturer. I trust them, Tyan and SuperMicro, personally. All in all, there are many ways to build a server, many theories on component selection, etc. I generally go with what I have experience working with. --- Andy To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 23: 2:57 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from anime.net (anime.net [63.172.78.150]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FDD437B719 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 23:02:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eugene@anime.net) Received: (from eugene@localhost) by anime.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id XAA19809 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 23:04:28 -0800 Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 23:04:28 -0800 From: Eugene Lee To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: /var/run/named.pid annoyance Message-ID: <20010311230428.B18069@anime.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Every time I do a reload, I get this in /var/log/messages: Mar 12 00:48:47 localhost named[119]: reloading nameserver Mar 12 00:48:47 localhost named[119]: couldn't create pid file '/var/run/named.pid' Mar 12 00:48:47 localhost named[119]: Ready to answer queries. The reason for this is that I run it with "-u bind -g bind" options. What would be the most secure way to solve this problem? -- Eugene Lee eugene@anime.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 23: 7:19 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from hotmail.com (f247.law4.hotmail.com [216.33.149.247]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B5EF37B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 23:07:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bahobab@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 23:07:14 -0800 Received: from 207.208.254.234 by lw4fd.law4.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 07:07:14 GMT X-Originating-IP: [207.208.254.234] From: "Konan Houphoue" To: akbeech@anchoragerescue.org, questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: NATD Redirect_port Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 01:07:14 -0600 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Mar 2001 07:07:14.0915 (UTC) FILETIME=[1121DB30:01C0AAC3] Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, I'm using firewall and natd on my freeBSD that connects to the Internet. How do I go about redirecting incoming connections on port 25 (SMTP) to the same port on another host on the inside private network? I already successfully redirect port 80 incoming connections on the public interface to another host on my private network. Here's what's in my /etc/rc.conf: ... #enabling Firewalling firewall_enable="YES" firewall_type="simple" #enabling NAT natd_enable="YES" natd_interface="fxp0" #natd_flags="-u -m -dynamic" #natd_interface="207.208.254.234" natd_flags="-redirect_port tcp 192.168.1.40:80 80" ... Thanks, Konan _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 23:21:17 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from edwin.mounet.com (edwin.mounet.com [216.145.76.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EF0E137B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 23:21:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hornback@wireco.net) Received: (qmail 581 invoked by uid 0); 12 Mar 2001 07:05:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO eagle) (216.145.70.47) by mounet.com with SMTP; 12 Mar 2001 07:05:49 -0000 From: "Andrew C. Hornback" To: "Charles Burns" Cc: Subject: RE: ProLiant 1500 questions... Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 02:20:12 -0500 Message-ID: <026401c0aac4$e18585f0$0f00000a@eagle> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of > Charles Burns > Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2001 12:44 AM > To: hornback@wireco.net; questions@freebsd.org > Subject: RE: ProLiant 1500 questions... > > > Err, I have absolutely no idea why FreeBSD is reporting 8 > PCI bridges. As > long as it isn't causing problems I would just write it off > as a weird > glitch. I think it may have something to do with the way that the ProLiant handles I/O, since it does seem to scream as far as I/O goes. > As far as the controller issue, from what I gather > the driver for > many Compaq RAID controller, including yours, isn't in a > 'final' form due to > Compaq's lack of helpful hardware specs or detailed > programming interface > information. I have never worked with this controller, so > the best that I > can do is give some general and probably useless advice: > > Try updating the controllers firmware. Updates can usually > be found at > http://www.compaq.com/support/files/server/us/index.html Already upgraded to the newest version possible. > Try using an older version of the driver. The current one > is a rewrite of > Mark Dawson's drivers which can be found at > http://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/~md/ida/ > > Andy Doran (ad@netbsd.org) wrote a driver for NetBSD last > year. You might > ask him to release it for FreeBSD if it hasn't already been done I might do that, but, the machine seems to run fine as soon as it boots properly. Just one of those quirks, I guess. > I have no idea how to reload the kernel multiple times > other than by doing > it manually at the initial timed prompt. If the controller > needs some more > time to initialize, you can increase the delay time of that > initial prompt. > I can't for the life of me remember how at the moment, but > it's really > simple. Perhaps after some sleep. I'm sure someone on this > board will > remember better than myself as I am still a FreeBSD novice myself. Talking to the friend of mine that originally helped me set the box up, he mentioned something about editing the /boot/loader.rc file, and adding what I needed to do to the end of it. I'm going to investigate that solution and see what I can come up with. Basically, it's just an inconvenience that the system has to have manual intervention when it boots, but, since this is going to be a server/firewall machine on my network, and it won't have a head setup on it, it needs to be "hands off"... > Sorry I couldn't help more. The problem does sound similar > to one that > occurs on my server with it's SCSI controller if the SCSI > timeout is set too > low. While the SCSI timeout apparently doesn't apply to your RAID > controller, the need for a timeout may apply. *nods* We think that the drive array doesn't "settle" properly until there's an intervening read to the drive. There could be something about the way that the RAID is set up, or something like that. > Here's a shot in the dark--if the disks aren't spinning up > fast enough...and > I am probably utterly on the wrong track here...you may be > able to set the > disks to spin up immediately upon powerup rather than on > the SCSI-bus > startup command (which is often default). > My Seagate Elite SX4464524 requires around a 20 second > pause at boot time if > I don't enable that feature. The controller determines when the drives spin up. This sounds like it could be the culprit though, since they may not have settled back down properly from the initial spin up, due to the fact that FreeBSD boots like a speed demon. Thoroughly impressive speed. > Must. Sleep. Now. > > Charles Burns > > >From: "Andrew C. Hornback" > >To: "Charles Burns" > >CC: > >Subject: RE: ProLiant 1500 questions... > >Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2001 20:16:26 -0500 > > > >Charles, > > > > Thanks for the reply, but I think we're in the wrong area. > > > > I'm including my dmesg output below. As you can see, > the problem > >with ida0 shows up a good deal before the "Waiting 5 > seconds for SCSI > >devices to settle" in the dmesg entry. > > > > I've been told that I should go through the > /boot/loader.rc and tell > >it to unload and reload the kernel (at least once) to prevent this > >error, since that's what I do manually to make the machine boot... > > > > Any ideas? > > > > Also, any idea why this machine sees 8 separate PCI > busses? It's > >only got one, as far as I know. One bus with 3 slots, all > filled... 8 > >slots total, 3 PCI / 5 EISA, with none of the EISA slots used. > > > > > >--- Andy > >------------------------ dmesg output --- > > > >Copyright (c) 1992-2000 The FreeBSD Project. > >Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, > >1994 > > The Regents of the University of California. All > rights reserved. > >FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE #0: Fri Mar 9 02:31:20 EST 2001 > > root@CLASSIFIED:/usr/src/sys/compile/CLASSIFIED > >Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz > >CPU: Pentium/P54C (133.61-MHz 586-class CPU) > > Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x52c Stepping = 12 > > Features=0x3bf > >real memory = 67108864 (65536K bytes) > >avail memory = 62533632 (61068K bytes) > >Changing APIC ID for IO APIC #0 from 0 to 2 on chip > >Programming 16 pins in IOAPIC #0 > >IOAPIC #0 intpin 2 -> irq 0 > >FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor motherboard > > cpu0 (BSP): apic id: 0, version: 0x00030010, at 0xfee00000 > > cpu1 (AP): apic id: 1, version: 0x00030010, at 0xfee00000 > > io0 (APIC): apic id: 2, version: 0x000f0011, at 0xfec00000 > >Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc02d1000. > >Intel Pentium detected, installing workaround for F00F bug > >md0: Malloc disk > >npx0: on motherboard > >npx0: INT 16 interface > >pcib0: on motherboard > >pci0: on pcib0 > >ncr0: port 0x7100-0x71ff mem > >0x4300000-0x43000ff irq 10 at device 10.0 on pci0 > >pcib8: at device 12.0 on pci0 > >pci1: on pcib8 > >ida0: port 0x8000-0x80ff mem > >0x42000000-0x43ffffff,0x40000000-0x400000ff irq 11 at device 0.0 on > >pci1 > >ida0: drives=1 firm_rev=1.24 > >idad0: on ida0 > >idad0: 4012MB (8217440 sectors), blocksize=512 > >tx0: port 0x7200-0x72ff mem > >0x4400000-0x4400fff irq 9 at device 13.0 on pci0 > >miibus0: on tx0 > >nsphy0: on miibus0 > >nsphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto > >tx0: address 00:e0:29:22:36:ee, type SMC9432TX > >tx1: port 0x7000-0x70ff mem > >0x4200000-0x4200fff irq 5 at device 14.0 on pci0 > >miibus1: on tx1 > >nsphy1: on miibus1 > >nsphy1: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto > >tx1: address 00:e0:29:21:e8:17, type SMC9432TX > >isab0: at device 15.0 on pci0 > >eisa0: on isab0 > >mainboard0: on eisa0 slot 0 > >isa0: on isab0 > >pcib1: on motherboard > >pci2: on pcib1 > >pcib2: on motherboard > >pci3: on pcib2 > >pcib3: on motherboard > >pci4: on pcib3 > >pcib4: on motherboard > >pci5: on pcib4 > >pcib5: on motherboard > >pci6: on pcib5 > >pcib6: on motherboard > >pci7: on pcib6 > >pcib7: on motherboard > >pci8: on pcib7 > >fdc0: at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq > 6 drq 2 on > >isa0 > >fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold > >fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 > >atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 > >atkbd0: flags 0x1 irq 1 on atkbdc0 > >kbd0 at atkbd0 > >psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 > >psm0: model Generic PS/2 mouse, device ID 0 > >vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem > 0xa0000-0xbffff on > >isa0 > >sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 > >sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> > >sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 > >sio0: type 16550A > >sio1 at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa0 > >sio1: type 16550A > >stray irq 7 > >APIC_IO: Testing 8254 interrupt delivery > >APIC_IO: routing 8254 via IOAPIC #0 intpin 2 > >Waiting 5 seconds for SCSI devices to settle > >SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! > >sa0 at ncr0 bus 0 target 6 lun 0 > >sa0: Removable Sequential Access > >SCSI-2 device > >sa0: 5.000MB/s transfers (5.000MHz, offset 8) > >no devsw (majdev=0 bootdev=0xa0300000) > >Mounting root from ufs:/dev/idad0s2a > >cd0 at ncr0 bus 0 target 5 lun 0 > >cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-2 device > >cd0: 3.300MB/s transfers > >cd0: cd present [326227 x 2048 byte records] > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > > > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of > > > Charles Burns > > > Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2001 9:53 AM > > > To: questions@freebsd.org > > > Subject: RE: ProLiant 1500 questions... > > > > > > > > > You can increase the time that the kernel waits for SCSI > > > devices by changing > > > the line "SCSI_DELAY=" in the kernel configuration file > located in > > > /sys/i386/conf (for x86 machines anyway) > > > You might try a value of 20000 to 30000 (to and 30 seconds > > > respectively) > > > > > > > > > >From: "Andrew C. Hornback" > > > >To: "Wai Chan" > > > >CC: > > > >Subject: RE: ProLiant 1500 questions... > > > >Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 21:42:57 -0500 > > > > > > > >Wai Chan, > > > > > > > > Thanks for the info. I've redone the entire > > > installation, compiled > > > >the kernel, got all of the memory and both processors > running. I > > > >sincerely appreciate the help. > > > > > > > > But, I have run into another small problem. > > > Occasionally, on boot, > > > >it will give me the following: > > > > > > > >ida0: port 0x8000-0x80ff mem > > > >0x42000000-0x43ffffff, 0x40000000-0x400000ff irq 11 at > > > device 0.0 on > > > >pci1 > > > >panic: ida_wait: timeout waiting for completion > > > >mp_lock = 00000001; cpuid = 0; lapic.id=00000000 > > > >Uptime: 0s > > > >Automatic reboot in 15 seconds - press a key on the > > > console to abort > > > > > > > > When we did the previous installation, the friend of > > > mine that set it > > > >up put in a larger pause delay earlier in the booting > process. He > > > >told me that he set it up to load and unload the > kernel four times, > > > >which would give the drives a chance to settle so that the > > > controller > > > >could be queried properly. > > > > > > > > Any ideas on remedying this problem? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > >--- Andy To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 23:29: 2 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from gekko.i-clue.de (server.ms-agentur.de [62.153.134.194]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ABE037B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 23:28:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from so@server.i-clue.de) Received: from i-clue.de (automatix.i-clue.de [192.168.0.112]) by gekko.i-clue.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) with ESMTP id JAA13941; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 09:35:29 +0100 Message-ID: <3AAC7B0D.C0647DBD@i-clue.de> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 08:30:21 +0100 From: Christoph Sold Reply-To: so@server.i-clue.de X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [de] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: PAC NDT Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports question References: <011301c0a8d9$7bb06020$1b01a8c0@lad> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > PAC NDT schrieb: > > Hi > > This is probably a stupid question, but I gotta ask. When I try to > install a port, say > 'ethereal' for example, make wants to look on the internet for the > files. The cdrom is in the drive and mounted but I can not figure out > how to get make to look at the CD. > Is there some kind of configuration file which will allow make to > default to the CD instead of the internet? If you mounted the CD-ROM onto the /cdrom mount point, make searches it automatically. Make sure the tarball make is looking for is located on the cdrom you've mounted. If all else fails, copy the tarball manually into the /usr/ports/distfiles directory. HTH -Christoph Sold To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 23:42:39 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from gekko.i-clue.de (server.ms-agentur.de [62.153.134.194]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3C2437B719 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 23:42:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from so@server.i-clue.de) Received: from i-clue.de (automatix.i-clue.de [192.168.0.112]) by gekko.i-clue.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) with ESMTP id JAA13990; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 09:49:08 +0100 Message-ID: <3AAC7E40.A0E6AEC2@i-clue.de> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 08:44:00 +0100 From: Christoph Sold Reply-To: so@server.i-clue.de X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [de] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Duraid Cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: Re: Install, Upgrade and Deinstall??? References: <3AA9B7B8.F054AB0F@home.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Duraid schrieb: > > ok .. here is the senario: > i go and install gnome and then i decide that i want to install the > newest version of kde .. so i cvsup my ports and install kde.. now i > want to remove gnome from the ports using make deinstall but it doestn't > work because the gnome port is not the same used for the installation > and i can't go and delete the packages because there were lot's of > dependencies that i don't know (im talking in general). > so what is the best strategy to install update uninstall packages while > keeping a clean system that doesn't need to be reinstalled after six > month's to update it??? pkg_info -aI tells you the names off all installed packages. The gnome port tells you which packages belong to the gnome desktop. pkg_delete (the name you got from pkg_info, including the version numbers) deletes the old stuff. HTH -Christoph Sold To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 23:50:47 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from gekko.i-clue.de (server.ms-agentur.de [62.153.134.194]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B3C637B719 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 23:50:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from so@server.i-clue.de) Received: from i-clue.de (automatix.i-clue.de [192.168.0.112]) by gekko.i-clue.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) with ESMTP id JAA14013; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 09:57:23 +0100 Message-ID: <3AAC802F.16A96146@i-clue.de> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 08:52:15 +0100 From: Christoph Sold Reply-To: so@server.i-clue.de X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [de] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Squires Cc: FreeBSD questions Subject: Re: Inbound connections to NT4 Server behind FreeBSD natd/firewall References: <200103101429.f2AET2r37067@ct980320-b.blmngtn1.in.home.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Mike Squires schrieb: > > I use a FreeBSD 4.3-STABLE box as a firewall/natd gateway for my home > network. I have an NT 4 Server running IIS4/FP 4.0 extensions and Oracle > 8.1.6 behind that firewall. > > The internal network uses non-routing IP numbers; the external network is > @home's. > > I would like to temporarily make the NT4 server accessible for connections > initiated by outside users for a development project, but can't figure > out any easy way of doing that. Outbound connections are, of course, a > piece of cake. > > The only solution I can think of would be to map the inbound connections to > http and FP to the NT4 server in the firewall script, but this would seem to > be dangerous given my low opinion of NT4 in a DMZ environment. Several possibilities exist: - Have your external partner add a route to your network manually into his routing table. - Install a VPN pointing to any FreeBSD box supporting it. - Use any secure tunnel (needs two boxers, one at your partner, one inside your network). - Have your firewall forward unusual ports to the NT box. (e.g. firewall/port 230 -> NT box/port 23 to forward telnet access). Your application must be able to specify unusual ports to use this. HTH -Christoph Sold To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 23:55: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from gekko.i-clue.de (server.ms-agentur.de [62.153.134.194]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B9EE37B719 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 23:55:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from so@server.i-clue.de) Received: from i-clue.de (automatix.i-clue.de [192.168.0.112]) by gekko.i-clue.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) with ESMTP id KAA14058; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 10:01:37 +0100 Message-ID: <3AAC812D.94355FFD@i-clue.de> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 08:56:29 +0100 From: Christoph Sold Reply-To: so@server.i-clue.de X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [de] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brian Wolter Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 2nd HDD problem References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Brian Wolter schrieb: > > two days ago the read/write head on my master hdd somehow got royally > messed up rendering the drive useless. today a replaced the master drive > and reinstalled FreeBSD. my second hdd, which i also used in conjunction > with the now ruined drive contains about 12 Gigs of data that i need back. > (both drives are UFS, partitioned under FreeBSD) > > i just finished reinstalling FreeBSD, but trying to mount the second > drive, that wasn't damaged, produces the error "incorrect super block". i > checked the label editor and the slices still exist, however the > corrosponding devices in /dev (should be ad5s1b and ad5s1e) don't. > > how can i create the appropriate device so i can once again mount this > drive without jepordizing it's contents? (or any other solution that would > work here) man MAKEDEV cd /dev sh ./MAKEDEV ad5 should do the job. Check the manpage and the header of this script first, since I answered without checking first ;) -Christoph Sold To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 23:57:52 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from linux.ssc.nsu.ru (linux.ssc.nsu.ru [193.124.219.91]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7DD3537B71A for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 23:57:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from danfe@inet.ssc.nsu.ru) Received: (qmail 2915 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2001 07:57:05 -0000 Received: from inet.ssc.nsu.ru (62.76.110.12) by hub.freebsd.org with SMTP; 12 Mar 2001 07:57:05 -0000 Received: from localhost (danfe@localhost) by inet.ssc.nsu.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA25480; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 13:56:09 +0600 Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 13:56:09 +0600 (NOVT) From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Jonathan Chen Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-mozilla@FreeBSD.ORG, mozilla-unix@mozilla.org Subject: Re: Compiling mozilla from ports -> stops with weird Bus Error message In-Reply-To: <20010312100701.A22602@itouchnz.itouch> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Jonathan Chen wrote: > On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 09:21:53PM +0600, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > Hello! > > > > My problem is rather easy to describe: mozilla won't compile on ny box. > > While everything else does. make all simply dies with Bus Error message > > after 4 hours of compiling things, and that's frustrates me. > > Mine takes some time as well, but it went thru' ok on a P-233, 64Mb RAM. > (on a recently cvsup'd /usr/ports). You'll have to include the weird > bus-error for the list to make a better guess. > Sure. I got this message appended to /var/log/messages: /kernel: pid 24378 (regxpcom), uid 0: exited on signal 10 (core dumped) And here's what my screen looks list upon make crash: ../../../config/nsinstall -R -m 444 _xpidlgen/necko_socket.xpt ../../../dist/bin/components gmake[1]: Выход из каталог `/usr/ports/www/mozilla/work/mozilla/netwerk/socket/base' gmake[1]: Вход в каталог `/usr/ports/www/mozilla/work/mozilla/dom/public' gmake[2]: Вход в каталог `/usr/ports/www/mozilla/work/mozilla/dom/public/base' gmake[2]: Выход из каталог `/usr/ports/www/mozilla/work/mozilla/dom/public/base' gmake[2]: Вход в каталог `/usr/ports/www/mozilla/work/mozilla/dom/public/coreDom' gmake[2]: Выход из каталог `/usr/ports/www/mozilla/work/mozilla/dom/public/coreDom' gmake[2]: Вход в каталог `/usr/ports/www/mozilla/work/mozilla/dom/public/coreEvents' gmake[2]: Выход из каталог `/usr/ports/www/mozilla/work/mozilla/dom/public/coreEvents' gmake[2]: Вход в каталог `/usr/ports/www/mozilla/work/mozilla/dom/public/range' gmake[2]: Выход из каталог `/usr/ports/www/mozilla/work/mozilla/dom/public/range' gmake[2]: Вход в каталог `/usr/ports/www/mozilla/work/mozilla/dom/public/events' gmake[2]: Выход из каталог `/usr/ports/www/mozilla/work/mozilla/dom/public/events' gmake[2]: Вход в каталог `/usr/ports/www/mozilla/work/mozilla/dom/public/html' gmake[2]: Выход из каталог `/usr/ports/www/mozilla/work/mozilla/dom/public/html' gmake[2]: Вход в каталог `/usr/ports/www/mozilla/work/mozilla/dom/public/css' gmake[2]: Выход из каталог `/usr/ports/www/mozilla/work/mozilla/dom/public/css' ../../config/nsinstall -R -m 444 _xpidlgen/dom.xpt ../../dist/bin/components gmake[1]: Выход из каталог `/usr/ports/www/mozilla/work/mozilla/dom/public' gmake[1]: Вход в каталог `/usr/ports/www/mozilla/work/mozilla/js' gmake[2]: Вход в каталог `/usr/ports/www/mozilla/work/mozilla/js/src/fdlibm' ../../../config/nsinstall -R -m 444 libfdm.a ../../../dist/lib gmake[2]: Выход из каталог `/usr/ports/www/mozilla/work/mozilla/js/src/fdlibm' gmake[2]: Вход в каталог `/usr/ports/www/mozilla/work/mozilla/js/src' ../../config/nsinstall -R -m 555 libmozjs.so ../../dist/lib ../../config/nsinstall -R -m 555 libmozjs.so ../../dist/bin gmake[2]: Выход из каталог `/usr/ports/www/mozilla/work/mozilla/js/src' gmake[1]: Выход из каталог `/usr/ports/www/mozilla/work/mozilla/js' gmake[1]: Вход в каталог `/usr/ports/www/mozilla/work/mozilla/extensions/psm-glue' gmake[2]: Вход в каталог `/usr/ports/www/mozilla/work/mozilla/extensions/psm-glue/public' ../../../config/nsinstall -R -m 444 _xpidlgen/psmglue.xpt ../../../dist/bin/components gmake[2]: Выход из каталог `/usr/ports/www/mozilla/work/mozilla/extensions/psm-glue/public' gmake[2]: Вход в каталог `/usr/ports/www/mozilla/work/mozilla/extensions/psm-glue/src' ../../../config/nsinstall -R -m 555 libpsmglue.so ../../../dist/lib/components : ../../../dist/lib/components/libpsmglue.so ../../../config/nsinstall -R -m 555 libpsmglue.so ../../../dist/bin/components : ../../../dist/bin/components/libpsmglue.so gmake[2]: Выход из каталог `/usr/ports/www/mozilla/work/mozilla/extensions/psm-glue/src' gmake[1]: Выход из каталог `/usr/ports/www/mozilla/work/mozilla/extensions/psm-glue' Bus error - core dumped *** Error code 138 Stop in /usr/ports/www/mozilla. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/mozilla. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/mozilla. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 11 23:58: 9 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from gekko.i-clue.de (server.ms-agentur.de [62.153.134.194]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C916637B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 23:58:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from so@server.i-clue.de) Received: from i-clue.de (automatix.i-clue.de [192.168.0.112]) by gekko.i-clue.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) with ESMTP id KAA14081; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 10:04:46 +0100 Message-ID: <3AAC81EA.D5E0125F@i-clue.de> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 08:59:38 +0100 From: Christoph Sold Reply-To: so@server.i-clue.de X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [de] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Ulrich Kruppa Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: JAVA-support ??? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Peter Ulrich Kruppa schrieb: > > Hello! > > I am running > FreeBSD 4.2 RELEASE. > I can display JAVA-applets in Netscape 4.76 > but neither in Netscape6 nor Mozilla xx. > > Are later versions of JAVA not supported yet? Both Netscape 6 and Mozilla do not include Java support. it has to be installed as a plugin from SUN. Unfortunately, none is available for FreeBSD -- use the Linux versions instead. HTH -Christoph Sold To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Mar 12 0: 1: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from tor-smtp3.attcanada.ca (tor-smtp3.attcanada.ca [207.181.101.71]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19BB937B718 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 00:01:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jenson@netcom.ca) Received: from desmondl.netcom.ca (van-bc52-092.netcom.ca [216.129.65.92]) by tor-smtp3.attcanada.ca (8.8.7-s-4/8.8.7) with ESMTP id DAA18536 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 03:00:59 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <4.3.0.20010311234918.00ba8890@inbox.attcanada.ca> X-Sender: jenson@inbox.attcanada.ca X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3 Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 23:59:22 -0800 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG From: Desmond Lee Subject: x-windows not working Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi there I'm a newbie and have successfully installed freed bsd 4.2, but am having problems with getting the graphical component running I'm pretty sure that my video card (ati rage fury pro with tv out) is compatible since the configuration tool used in the free bsd installation worked perfect. The only problem is that when it tries to start the x-server ( i think that's the graphical component part of bsd, like x-window right? ), it stalls and doesn't t go anywhere. To stop this i have to reboot and the configuration is left undone. I have no idea why this is. I think it may have to do with some of the files that couldn't get copied over during installation. In particular, the x1k98, x9set and a bunch of the pc98-servers/ files couldn't get transferred over during installation. If anyone could help me with this problem that would be great, 'cause I've wanted to get up and running w/ free bsd for sooooooo long, but am having so much difficulty. Thanks in advance Regards Desmond Lee To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Mar 12 0:13:29 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mail.nbrewer.com (sparge.nbrewer.com [208.42.68.70]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8B7237B718 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 00:13:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris@nbrewer.com) Received: by mail.nbrewer.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 364C6383071; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 02:13:26 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 02:13:25 -0600 From: Christopher Farley To: Eugene Lee Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: /var/run/named.pid annoyance Message-ID: <20010312021324.D78116@northernbrewer.com> Mail-Followup-To: Christopher Farley , Eugene Lee , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20010311230428.B18069@anime.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010311230428.B18069@anime.net>; from eugene@anime.net on Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 11:04:28PM -0800 Organization: Northern Brewer, St. Paul, MN Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Eugene Lee (eugene@anime.net) wrote: > Every time I do a reload, I get this in /var/log/messages: > > Mar 12 00:48:47 localhost named[119]: reloading nameserver > Mar 12 00:48:47 localhost named[119]: couldn't create pid file '/var/run/named.pid' > Mar 12 00:48:47 localhost named[119]: Ready to answer queries. > > The reason for this is that I run it with "-u bind -g bind" options. > What would be the most secure way to solve this problem? This is a permissions problem. User bind does not have permissions to write files to /var/run. The desired workaround is to change the PID file location by adding this to the "options" section of your /etc/namedb/named.conf file: pid-file "/var/named/named.pid" You must then (as root): # mkdir /var/named # chown bind:bind /var/named More details on this setup are available at: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-01%3A18.bind.asc -- Christopher Farley www.northernbrewer.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Mar 12 0:58:53 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from relay.ioffe.rssi.ru (relay.ioffe.rssi.ru [194.85.224.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A2C337B783 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 00:58:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kopts@astro.ioffe.rssi.ru) Received: from astro.ioffe.rssi.ru (astro.ioffe.rssi.ru [194.85.229.130]) by relay.ioffe.rssi.ru (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA24010; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 11:58:28 +0300 (MSK) Received: by astro.ioffe.rssi.ru (8.9.3/Clnt-2.14-AS-eef) id LAA03702; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 11:58:27 +0300 (MSK) Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 11:58:27 +0300 (MSK) From: Alexey Koptsevich To: Greg Lehey Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: recover of failed vinum partition In-Reply-To: <20010312094232.U57126@wantadilla.lemis.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, > > I have simple vinum concat partition of two drives of different sizes, but > > they reside on identical drives. One (the first) drive has crashed and it > > is completely unavailable for the moment. Unfortunately I have made an > > error when tried to revive partition and at the moment I have this failed > > drive replaced by another vinum partition in the vinum configuration. This > > partition has different size than the original (failed) one. Is there a > > way to restore the part of the disc which resides on the drive which has > > not crashed? I.e., is there a way to recreate the old vinum configuration > > somehow and then carry out correct revival procedure? I know parameters of > > the drive, they are identical to those which has not failed. > > It would be nice to have a few details of your current situation. The > output of "vinum list" would help. >vinum list 1 drives: D a State: up Device /dev/ad2s1f Avail: 99/100 MB (100%) D b State: referenced Device Avail: 0/0 MB 1 volumes: V mega State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 8601 MB 2 plexes: P mega.p0 C State: faulty Subdisks: 1 Size: 8601 MB P mega.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 0 Size: 0 B 1 subdisks: S mega.p0.s1 State: crashed PO: 0 B Size: 8601 MB > If you only have one plex in the volume, you're basically hosed. ufs > doesn't provide for recovery of partial file systems. Yes, I have only one plex. So, it is impossible in princile to recover the data which reside on partially lost filesystem? Yours, Alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Mar 12 1: 3:12 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from anime.net (anime.net [63.172.78.150]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29AD737B718 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 01:03:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eugene@anime.net) Received: (from eugene@localhost) by anime.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id BAA21634 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 01:04:47 -0800 Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 01:04:47 -0800 From: Eugene Lee To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: /var/run/named.pid annoyance Message-ID: <20010312010447.A21036@anime.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20010311230428.B18069@anime.net> <20010312021324.D78116@northernbrewer.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <20010312021324.D78116@northernbrewer.com>; from chris@northernbrewer.com on Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 02:13:25AM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 02:13:25AM -0600, Christopher Farley wrote: : : Eugene Lee (eugene@anime.net) wrote: : > Mar 12 00:48:47 localhost named[119]: couldn't create pid file '/var/run/named.pid' [...] : > What would be the most secure way to solve this problem? : : This is a permissions problem. User bind does not have permissions to : write files to /var/run. : : The desired workaround is to change the PID file location by adding : this to the "options" section of your /etc/namedb/named.conf file: [rest of solution snipped] Thanks for the tip. I knew it was a permissions thing. And I thought about creating some kind of "daemon" group and changing /var/run, etc. appropriately. But I guess that would just get more messy than setting up a directory for each daemon. -- Eugene Lee eugene@anime.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Mar 12 1:11:46 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from cgmd76206.chello.nl (d9168.upc-d.chello.nl [213.46.9.168]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBE0E37B718 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 01:11:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from edwin@cgmd76206.chello.nl) Received: by cgmd76206.chello.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 68E2C3BE; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 10:11:41 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 10:11:41 +0100 From: Edwin Groothuis To: Craig Hill Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Hi Message-ID: <20010312101141.E25892@cgmd76206.chello.nl> Mail-Followup-To: Edwin Groothuis , Craig Hill , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG References: <000801c0aa98$55c68b80$6401a8c0@4668> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <000801c0aa98$55c68b80$6401a8c0@4668>; from craigze@pacbell.net on Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 06:01:20PM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 06:01:20PM -0800, Craig Hill wrote: > Hi, > I just bought FreeBSD 4.2 four cd-rom set. I was looking through > the cd's I have and was wondering where the uncompiled full source > code is for the OS. Let me know so I know where it is. It's on the cd's. During the install (I assume you installed it) you were asked what you would want to install: user, X-user, developer and so on. If you choose anything without developer you wouldn't get the sources installed. If you want to install them anyway: /stand/sysinstall -> Configure -> Distributions -> something. If you have the cd (which you do :-), the source is in the src/ directory, as splitted-tarred-gzipped files. Use cat, tar and gunzip to read them! Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.MavEtJu.org edwin@mavetju.org | Interested in MUDs? Visit Fatal Dimensions: ------------------+ http://FatalDimensions.nl.eu.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Mar 12 1:31:56 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from wop21.wop.wtb.tue.nl (wop21.wop.wtb.tue.nl [131.155.56.216]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7131C37B718 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 01:31:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from karelj@wop21.wop.wtb.tue.nl) Received: (from karelj@localhost) by wop21.wop.wtb.tue.nl (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f2C9Tk568189; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 10:29:47 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from karelj) Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 10:28:25 +0100 From: "Karel J. Bosschaart" To: Glenn Johnson Cc: Adriaan Rossouw , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: G450 + 3D on X 4.0.2 Message-ID: <20010312102825.A68142@wop21.wop.wtb.tue.nl> References: <00ec01c0a87a$c8af9300$956410ac@abraxas365.com> <20010309114659.A1466@node7.cluster.srrc.usda.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <20010309114659.A1466@node7.cluster.srrc.usda.gov>; from glennpj@charter.net on Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 11:46:59AM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 11:46:59AM -0600, Glenn Johnson wrote: > On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 11:24:47AM +0200, Adriaan Rossouw wrote: > > > I was just wondering if hardware 3d works on XF4.0.2 (compiled with > > the matrox supplied proprietery drivers, and running perfectly) works > > on FreeBSD. > > > > It's not really a feature i *need* , just be nice to be able to play > > with blender and the like. > > You will have to build the 3D bits yourself. Unfortunately, I do not > think that anyone is keeping up with the FreeBSD DRI and specifically > the mga module in XF4.0.2 from a development standpoint so there is a > bit of hacking involved. I have it working (sort of) with a Matrox G400 > on my home system. The speed is quite good but it will make my system > wedge periodically, I would say maybe once out of every 3-4 times I > launch a 3D app. I have not tried blender however. You do _not_ want > to enable this on a production machine. When my system locks up with > a 3D app I go to my wife's computer and telnet into my FreeBSD box and > kill the 3D app if I can or reboot if necessary. I have had it also > kill the networking as well which meant I had to hit the reset button > which of course can lead to file system damage. > > Let me know if you still want to pursue this and I will cobble together > some instructions. Actually, most of what you need to do is posted in > the mail archives. > FYI, I did a write-up of the postings concerning DRI with G400 on http://wop21.wop.wtb.tue.nl/freebsd/hwaccel.html , and I'm working to add instructions for installing linux games. Chop off hwaccel.html from mentioned url to see the pages in construction; please note they are not completed yet. Karel. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Mar 12 1:38:51 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from clientmail.realtime.co.uk (simian.realtime.co.uk [194.205.134.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 781BB37B719 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 01:38:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from waynep@zaphod.realtime.co.uk) Received: from zaphod.realtime.co.uk ([194.205.134.208]) by clientmail.realtime.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 14cOmi-0007fl-01; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 09:38:36 +0000 Received: from waynep by zaphod.realtime.co.uk with local (Exim 3.20 #1) id 14cOmf-000If5-00; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 09:38:33 +0000 From: Wayne Pascoe To: Jorge Biquez Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Load Balancing .... References: <5.0.2.1.2.20010310221804.02578a50@icsmx.com> Reply-To: wayne.pascoe@realtime.co.uk Date: 12 Mar 2001 09:38:33 +0000 In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.2.20010310221804.02578a50@icsmx.com> Message-ID: Lines: 24 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Jorge Biquez writes: > Hello all. > > I'm running FreeBSD 3.2 with apache without problems. I decided to > have 2 machines running my sites and use load balancing on my > radios. It is working very good. Actually I FTP all the new > information on both servers when I need to make changes. > > > I'm not a FreeBSD expert but learning and I was wondering if you could > give me your advice on how to have both machines updated identical the > > best way. In situations like this, rsync can really be your friend. Our production servers rsync the web tree from our staging servers from cron every 15 minutes, and this works great for very large web trees. -- - Wayne Pascoe E-mail: wayne.pascoe@realtime.co.uk Phone : +44 (0) 20 7544 4668 Mobile: +44 (0) 788 431 1675 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Mar 12 1:47: 2 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from tkh.att.ne.jp (tkh.att.ne.jp [165.76.17.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B699C37B718 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 01:46:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lukek@tkh.att.ne.jp) Received: from magome (96.pool8.ipctokyo.att.ne.jp [165.76.204.96]) by tkh.att.ne.jp (8.8.8+Spin/3.6W-CONS(10/06/00)) id SAA04650; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 18:46:58 +0900 (JST) From: "Luke Kearney" To: "Free BSD" Subject: named troubles Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 18:48:42 +0900 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, I having no end of trouble in understanding what is going on with my name server setup. I have a server running FreeBSD 4.2 release and named 8.2.3 which I will upgrade just as soon as I can get this version to work properly ). The machine is an internal network nameserver with 2 NIC's. The NIC's have different IP's . The portmapper daemon is running. Mar 12 18:39:28 asakusa named[271]: bind(dfd=20, [192.168.0.2].53): Address already in use Mar 12 18:39:28 asakusa named[271]: deleting interface [192.168.0.2].53 Mar 12 18:39:28 asakusa named[271]: bind(dfd=22, [127.0.0.1].53): Address already in use Mar 12 18:39:28 asakusa named[271]: deleting interface [127.0.0.1].53 Mar 12 18:39:28 asakusa named[272]: Ready to answer queries. Mar 12 18:40:21 asakusa /kernel: arp: 192.168.0.2 is on lo0 but got reply from 00:90:99:24:62:e7 on xl0 Mar 12 18:40:56 asakusa /kernel: arp: 192.168.0.1 is on vr0 but got reply from 00:90:cc:08:31:83 on xl0 Mar 12 18:41:07 asakusa /kernel: arp: 192.168.0.1 is on vr0 but got reply from 00:90:cc:08:31:83 on xl0 Whenever I start named it dies pretty much instantly and the following messages appear when I try nslookups bash-2.04# nslookup localhost *** Can't find server name for address 192.168.0.2: Timed out *** Default servers are not available resolv.conf looks something like this bash-2.04# cat /etc/resolv.conf domain meibin.net nameserver 192.168.0.2 Any mistakes in my zone files don't seem to be the problem because initially I cannot get named started. This is probably something of a newbie question but any guidance is really appreciated. Thanks Luke To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Mar 12 2: 6: 7 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from kumquat.mail.uk.easynet.net (kumquat.mail.uk.easynet.net [195.40.1.42]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4317737B719 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 02:06:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from paul.crossley@uk.easynet.net) Received: from magrat.office.easynet.net ([195.40.3.130]) by kumquat.mail.uk.easynet.net with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 14cPDB-0003Bc-00; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 10:05:57 +0000 Received: by magrat.office.easynet.net with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <1NLKMHL3>; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 10:03:51 -0000 Message-ID: From: Paul Crossley To: 'Luke Kearney' , Free BSD Subject: RE: named troubles Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 10:03:51 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp" Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG The nslookup problem is a fairly common one for new setups, until you fix this one you won't get much that's useful out of nslookup. Unfortunately the first thing nslookup does is try to tell you the NAME of the server that you are talking to , if it can't it gives up. You therefore need a reverse lookup to convert the ip address for your name server back into it's name. If you already have a reverse mapping for the loopback address you could set your nameserver to 127.0.0.1 until you've got things going, otherwise you will need to set up an authoritative domain for reverse name lookups - in your case you need to be authoritative for 0.168.192.in-addr.arpa. The zone file for this domain will have PTR records to turn the ip addresses into names. Adress to mane lookups are resolved by the same mechanism as name to address so the octets in the zone name (0.168.192) have to be written with the most specific portion on the left just as you do with domain names. Portmapper doesn't get involved with dns but you should see named running in fact I wonder whether it IS starting up but you've been fooled by the nslookup problem, your startup messages certainly make it look as if somethings already listening on port 53. Do a ps and check whether named is there. Problems in the configuration file or zone files can cause the nameserver to abort at startup so don't assume that they are correct. -----Original Message----- From: Luke Kearney [mailto:lukek@tkh.att.ne.jp] Sent: 12 March 2001 09:49 To: Free BSD Subject: named troubles Hi, I having no end of trouble in understanding what is going on with my name server setup. I have a server running FreeBSD 4.2 release and named 8.2.3 which I will upgrade just as soon as I can get this version to work properly ). The machine is an internal network nameserver with 2 NIC's. The NIC's have different IP's . The portmapper daemon is running. Mar 12 18:39:28 asakusa named[271]: bind(dfd=20, [192.168.0.2].53): Address already in use Mar 12 18:39:28 asakusa named[271]: deleting interface [192.168.0.2].53 Mar 12 18:39:28 asakusa named[271]: bind(dfd=22, [127.0.0.1].53): Address already in use Mar 12 18:39:28 asakusa named[271]: deleting interface [127.0.0.1].53 Mar 12 18:39:28 asakusa named[272]: Ready to answer queries. Mar 12 18:40:21 asakusa /kernel: arp: 192.168.0.2 is on lo0 but got reply from 00:90:99:24:62:e7 on xl0 Mar 12 18:40:56 asakusa /kernel: arp: 192.168.0.1 is on vr0 but got reply from 00:90:cc:08:31:83 on xl0 Mar 12 18:41:07 asakusa /kernel: arp: 192.168.0.1 is on vr0 but got reply from 00:90:cc:08:31:83 on xl0 Whenever I start named it dies pretty much instantly and the following messages appear when I try nslookups bash-2.04# nslookup localhost *** Can't find server name for address 192.168.0.2: Timed out *** Default servers are not available resolv.conf looks something like this bash-2.04# cat /etc/resolv.conf domain meibin.net nameserver 192.168.0.2 Any mistakes in my zone files don't seem to be the problem because initially I cannot get named started. This is probably something of a newbie question but any guidance is really appreciated. Thanks Luke To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Mar 12 2:11:28 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from dconlon.donhost.co.uk (dconlon.demon.co.uk [193.237.55.196]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75F9537B718 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 02:11:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from daniel@donhost.co.uk) Received: from doncasterser1 [127.0.0.1] by dconlon.donhost.co.uk [193.237.55.196] with SMTP (MDaemon.v3.5.2.R) for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 10:15:44 +0000 From: "Daniel Conlon [Donhost]" To: Subject: pw corrupts files Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 10:15:44 -0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 X-MDRemoteIP: 127.0.0.1 X-Return-Path: daniel@donhost.co.uk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have a FreeBSD 3.4 box with about 4000 users. I use the 'pw' program called from scripts to create new accounts and to change passwords. On this system there is nothing other than the 'pw' program which would have cause to change the password files on the system. Users do not have shell access etc. so it is only the scripts and thus 'pw' which deals with the password files. On two separate occasions the password files on the system have become corrupted. On the first occasion, /etc/master.passwd was truncated about half way down and /etc/passwd was left unharmed. On the second occasion both /etc/master.passwd and /etc/passwd were truncated at the same point once again about half way down. I have read of similar problems in the list archives occurring on busy boxes where 'pw' is being invoked regularly but have found no explanation or fix. This is obviously a serious problem as on both occasions the root user has been removed from the system. Any pointers or help you could offer on this would be greatly appreciated. Kind Regards, Daniel Conlon Donhost Ltd. ########################## Tel: +44 (0)800 956 7642 Mob: +44 (0)7939 268 799 Fax: +44 (0)8707 41 51 07 http://www.donhost.co.uk ########################## To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Mar 12 2:27:46 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mailmx.ada.net.tr (mailmx.ada.net.tr [213.232.0.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE72537B718 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 02:27:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from satinalma@tepeyp.com.tr) Received: from tepeyp.tepeyp.com.tr (root@tepeyp.tepeyp.com.tr [195.112.159.207]) by mailmx.ada.net.tr (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f2CAT8O10186 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 12:29:10 +0200 Received: from host ([192.168.100.8]) by tepeyp.tepeyp.com.tr (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id f2CASdu01921 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 12:28:41 +0200 Message-ID: <003901c0aadf$46661ce0$0864a8c0@tepeyp.com.tr> From: "Barkin T. Alar" To: Subject: Booting FreeBSD 4.1 pasivates the active partition Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 12:28:13 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0036_01C0AAEF.E7EC42A0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0036_01C0AAEF.E7EC42A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-9" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 1. Summary : I 'm having some kind of reboot problem like after a FreeBSD boot it = passivates the Primary DOS partition on Pri-IDE Master Drive so that i = cannot boot up the next time. I never had such a problem on the same = state before.=20 The story: I have 2 harddisks, 20GB Quantum on Pri-IDE Master and 3.2GB Quantum on = Sec-IDE Master. I also have a 32X Pioneer CD-Rom Drive attached on = Sec-IDE Slave. The Pri-IDE Slave is free. The 20GB Harddisk is partitioned into 3 on a Win98 system with approx. = 10GB C: , 6GB D:, and 4GB E: drives. The 3.2GB Harddisk is a complete FreeBSD 4.1 system with some MBs of = Swap (for ex. 256MB) and the rest is a file system ( / ). The procedure i follow on installing both OS : First i install the Win98 OS on to C: and then i boot up from my FreeBSD = 4.1 CD and make the FreeBSD 4.1 OS install. After the FreeBSD = installation I reboot to run FreeBSD and the boot manager respectively = displays=20 F1 Windows=20 F5 Drive 1=20 so that i hit F5 and=20 F1 FreeBSD F5 Drive 0 and then i hit F1 this time and boot up the FreeBSD system. Everything = seems to be working fine now until i shutdown and/or reboot to run = either Windows 98 or FreeBSD 4.1. And here comes the problem : It cannot find the active partition resulting with a disk boot failure. = This makes me fdisk with a Win98 or FreeBSD boot disk and reactivate the = C: drive and restart. This time it boots from Win98 but if i choose to = boot from FreeBSD then the same problem occurs. Its like booting the = FreeBSD pasivates the C: . Any comments? 2. An additional question i would like to ask since i have stated the = Harddisk details above. I have no problem on mounting C: with the = command mount_msdos /dev/wd0s1 /mnt but i don't know how to mount DOS (actually Windows 98 FAT32) drives D: = and E: . What is the procedure i should follow ? Thanks very much. Barkin Alar pinnace@superonline.com satinalma@tepeyp.com.tr ------=_NextPart_000_0036_01C0AAEF.E7EC42A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-9" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
1.
 
Summary :
 
I 'm having some kind of reboot problem like after a FreeBSD boot = it=20 passivates the Primary DOS partition on Pri-IDE Master Drive so that i = cannot=20 boot up the next time. I never had such a problem on the same state = before.=20
&