Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2019 14:15:05 -0800 From: "Simon J. Gerraty" <sjg@juniper.net> To: <cem@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <arch@freebsd.org>, <sjg@juniper.net> Subject: Re: Killing RANDOM_LOADABLE? Message-ID: <40710.1575238505@kaos.jnpr.net> In-Reply-To: <CAG6CVpXFjxUxKL6Bb3Gw1Krdo4PkUPBjCnnG5hrDcr39aoF=zQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAG6CVpXFjxUxKL6Bb3Gw1Krdo4PkUPBjCnnG5hrDcr39aoF=zQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Conrad Meyer <cem@freebsd.org> wrote: > If you use / need RANDOM_LOADABLE, can you provide some information on > your use case and needs? If RANDOM_LOADABLE support was dropped in We use it in all our kernels. For FIPS 140-? certification we need to load *only* an approved PRNG. We don't particularly like that and nor do some of our customers - so some 4th does runtime selection of rng module during boot.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40710.1575238505>