Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 12 May 1998 18:21:30 +1000
From:      Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
To:        freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG, Tor.Egge@idi.ntnu.no
Subject:   Re: kern/6587: SMP idle cpl breaks signal forwarding
Message-ID:  <199805120821.SAA27380@godzilla.zeta.org.au>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Having a shared AST flag in an SMP configuration is wrong. 
> This is one of the bad side effects.

I think never setting it in cpl might be best.  The swi_ast_phantom
code should handle unexpected swi_ast's.  This is probably an
optimization, even in the UP case - swi_ast's are relatively rare,
and phantom ones would still be relatively rarer (new ones would
only occur when there is certain interrupt handling between the
setting of SWI_AST in ipending and return to user mode), so testing
the RPL bits in the trap frame should be cheaper than toggling
SWI_AST in cpl for every syscall.

The shared AST flag in ipending may be correct even for SMP.  It
gets multiplexed by trap().

Bruce

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199805120821.SAA27380>