From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 9 17:10:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96C0A16A421 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 17:10:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsdcrank@squbes.com) Received: from vms042pub.verizon.net (vms042pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44A4D43D49 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 17:10:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsdcrank@squbes.com) Received: from [192.168.177.29] ([141.149.59.236]) by vms042.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2 HotFix 0.04 (built Dec 24 2004)) with ESMTPA id <0IKY007WFT21GCS3@vms042.mailsrvcs.net> for freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2005 12:10:49 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 13:10:48 -0400 From: Gregg Cooper In-reply-to: <20050809154342.GB88538@xor.obsecurity.org> To: Kris Kennaway Message-id: <42F8E398.9030003@squbes.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en-us, en References: <42F4F968.80600@squbes.com> <20050809033920.GA87042@xor.obsecurity.org> <42F8B328.4030305@squbes.com> <20050809134728.GA55529@xor.obsecurity.org> <42F8B8D6.4040304@squbes.com> <20050809154342.GB88538@xor.obsecurity.org> User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050721) Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Ports disconnected from category Makefiles X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 17:10:50 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > Right, because that port is deliberately not connected to the build > yet, and your find | xargs did the wrong thing. Well, my first naive approach was to simply run "make -DBATCH fetch" from /usr/ports - which promptly stopped at the first port that was unfetchable at the moment (of which, there are _many_). While not disputing that my find-xargs-fetch workaround is the "wrong thing", what is a "more better" way to snatch as many ports as possible? Gregg