Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 08:57:53 -0700 From: "Jason Helfman" <jhelfman@e-e.com> To: "Michael Scheidell" <scheidell@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> Subject: Re: FAQ on PORTREVISION bump? Message-ID: <63ca1b333a310ecc2b1d1f0e1e1542a1.squirrel@mail.experts-exchange.com> In-Reply-To: <4F733432.4020902@FreeBSD.org> References: <4F732C89.3040804@FreeBSD.org> <CADLo838kts0QhA1Rvf=S-GCZK2quyfmUdJHUqn6J2-31F9aWXQ@mail.gmail.com> <4F733432.4020902@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > On 3/28/12 11:39 AM, Chris Rees wrote: >> You also need to consider that packages are rebuilt on a bump, so if >> the RUN_DEPEND removal were a real monster, the pkg_add -r users will >> thank you for that. > Im guessing perl would qualify for that :-).. needs perl to build, but > not run. > > python, bison, things like that, right? Maybe we can address anything here that needs tuning/adding/removing: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/book.html#MAKEFILE-NAMING-REVEPOCH -jgh
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?63ca1b333a310ecc2b1d1f0e1e1542a1.squirrel>