From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Sep 18 16:39:52 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6674516A4CE
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 18 Sep 2004 16:39:52 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 61F1443D1D
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 18 Sep 2004 16:39:51 +0000 (GMT)	(envelope-from krylon@gmx.net)
Received: (qmail 17660 invoked by uid 65534); 18 Sep 2004 16:39:49 -0000
Received: from i5387418F.versanet.de (EHLO neuromancer.krylon.net)
	(83.135.65.143)
	by mail.gmx.net (mp007) with SMTP; 18 Sep 2004 18:39:49 +0200
X-Authenticated: #685629
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 18:39:53 +0200
From: Benjamin Walkenhorst <krylon@gmx.net>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Message-Id: <20040918183953.0666ea91.krylon@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <200409181101.25973.josh@tcbug.org>
References: <20040918165741.20d10137.krylon@gmx.net>
	<200409181101.25973.josh@tcbug.org>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2.1)
User-Agent: Sylpheed 0.9.7
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: X.org performance?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 16:39:52 -0000

Hello,

On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 11:01:25 -0500
Josh Paetzel <josh@tcbug.org> wrote:

> Runs like a champ.

Good for you. =)
I'm not really saying it doesn't run sufficiently - or if I was, I
didn't mean to -, it's just that X.org is consuming large amounts of
cpu-time. 
I mean, it's not like my system is getting slow, exactly, it's just 
Xorg uses a lot of CPU, sometimes. 
I mean, XFree did that, too, but I am under the impression that Xorg is
a little worse, in that respect.

Or is it just my perception tricking me, while Xorg is not that
different from XFree, technically?

> Josh Paetzel

Kind regards,
Benjamin