Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 25 Nov 2008 09:17:06 -0500
From:      "Josh Carroll" <josh.carroll@gmail.com>
To:        "Kostik Belousov" <kostikbel@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: ext2 inode size patch - RE: PR kern/124621
Message-ID:  <8cb6106e0811250617q5fffb41exe20dfb8314fc4a9d@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20081125140601.GH2042@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
References:  <8cb6106e0811241129o642dcf28re4ae177c8ccbaa25@mail.gmail.com> <20081125140601.GH2042@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I already expressed my opinion on
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2008-September/025933.html
>

Sorry, I do not subscribe to hackers@ so I did not see that message. So what do
you recommend is done to further test it? I tested simple things like copies,
writes, deletes, etc on a memory disk, but nothing formal. I don't (currently)
have a spare blank disk or space on an existing disk to test on physical media,
but I can look into doing so once my development box is back up and running.

I'm also curious what about the changes you feel are dangerous, so I can target
the testing to exercise the boundary conditions or circumstances you think this
patch would elicit problems.

Thanks,
Josh



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8cb6106e0811250617q5fffb41exe20dfb8314fc4a9d>