Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2000 20:15:42 -0800 (PST) From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> To: Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net> Cc: "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@futuresouth.com>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: /usr/ports/ too big? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0002122011480.97914-100000@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <00021020011700.00825@localhost.localdomain>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, Richard Wackerbarth wrote: > > Nobody's forcing you to keep the CVS tree. > Yes, they (defacto) are. I need access to the recent history in order > to deal with "bleeding edge" problems. What I don't need is all of the > ancient history on line. Then your particular usage requirements for FreeBSD are incompatible with the currently-available tools in the world today, and the only solution is for you to write a replacement to CVS which is fully backwards-compatible with it, but which allows you to discard old history. But given that this doesn't seem to be a problem for anyone but you I don't think your chances are very good of getting FreeBSD to switch to it. People who don't like keeping the revision history around use cvsup and store nothing but the latest version of the system. People who want history locally swallow the few extra megabytes of disk space and take the entire revision history. Kris ---- "How many roads must a man walk down, before you call him a man?" "Eight!" "That was a rhetorical question!" "Oh..then, seven!" -- Homer Simpson To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0002122011480.97914-100000>