Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 08 Sep 2005 13:50:32 +0200
From:      "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@mail.uni-mainz.de>
To:        =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Malachi_de_=C6lfweald?= <malachid@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: nForce4-SLI, AHCI and NCQ and FreeBSD 6.0
Message-ID:  <43202588.9030903@mail.uni-mainz.de>
In-Reply-To: <c090347a050906070821e844d7@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <431D90E1.1030105@mail.uni-mainz.de> <c090347a050906070821e844d7@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello.
Are you really sure the onboard Sil SATA controller supports SATA II? 
When I studied the handbook of both motherboards, the A8N-SLI Deluxe and 
A8N-SLI Premium I found both motherboards are idetically equipted with 
the *not* SATA II capable SilI3114 SATA controller. By the way, as I 
know, the second SATA controller is attached via the PCI32 bus, not via 
PCIe! That means (in my opinion) there is no benefit using this 
controller. It is more a marketing GAG than a serious add-on.

RAID5 performance of ICH7R and SilI is said to be very, very poor (about 
10 MB/s read/write performance), so what benefit I do have using this 
controller with it's senseless 'capabilities' and non-PCIe attachment?

This is only a thought based on my personal available informations and 
maybe wrong ...

Oliver

Malachi de Ælfweald wrote:
> I have noticed the same thing with the onboard Silicon Image controller. 
> I am using the A8N-SLI Premium. I am using the Silicon Image controller 
> instead of the nForce4 controller because it specifically said SATAII 
> and said it supported RAID5 (whereas the nForce did not support RAID5). 
> However, on boot it recognizes it as SATA150 (which should be SATA300).
> 
> Malachi
> 
> On 9/6/05, *O. Hartmann* <ohartman@mail.uni-mainz.de 
> <mailto:ohartman@mail.uni-mainz.de>> wrote:
> 
>     Hello.
>     I have a little question about the popular nForce4-SLI chipset for the
>     Socket 939 platform. The onboard SATA controller of the nForce4-SLI
>     chipset claims to be NCQ (or SATA II) capable, but nVidia implemented
>     this feature in a not-AHCI-standardised way, but as an own solution. My
>     question is: Is the FBSD 6.X driver for the nForce4-SLI chipset capable
>     of using NCQ (as I know, the driver has to enable NCQ and it's not done
>     automatically by the harddrive-controller interaction).
> 
>     Thanks in advance,
>     Oliver
>     _______________________________________________
>     freebsd-questions@freebsd.org <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
>     mailing list
>     http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>     To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
>     freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org
>     <mailto:freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org>"
> 
> 




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43202588.9030903>